"In interactive games, the person playing is doing the action, therefore I think it has a higher impact and impact is always been a consideration in censorship or classification, call it what you will," he said.
It's called 'science' and it's not that hard. Psychology is a data driven field now- you don't just make up some ontological-Freud-style gibberish and call it an argument.
You've seen the kind of material that R18+ gamers are circulating. [/quote]Meanwhile, their kids are circulating material you have
not seen-
and cannot unsee. Besides, talking about the collective actions of "R18+ gamers" is like talking about brunettes. That's quite a large population you're attributing characteristics to.
Were I a skeptic, I might wonder if details of the 'threatening gamers' story are exaggerated. Still, I would be surprised if he hasn't received threats of some kind related to his political stance. Please, don't threaten the guy- just shrug your shoulders, raise your eyebrows quizzically, and make
him look like an asshole.
We shouldn't be threatening people, anyway. Can that be a rule?