YeyJordan said:
I don't even use the swastika as my icon and I'm a bit frosted by this story. Just another example of political correctness trumping all logic or choice. If Microsoft - or before them, even, the ESRB - had an issue with the swastika, why was Black Ops rated and published on the Xbox?
"It's not political correctness, it's fundamental respect," my backside. Fantastic job painting prickery as nobility.
As in every multiplayer game
"Online interaction not rated by the ESRB".
This means that the ESRB have no control over user made content and thus can't rate it. Instead this falls under the jurisdiction of the service provide, in this case Microsoft, who clearly state in the Terms of Service and Code of Conduct for X-Box Live:
"Don't create a gamertag, profile content, Avatar action, Avatar content, or in-game content that other users may be offended by".
Obviously many people may be offended by users choosing to display the Swastika (especially those with Jewish heritage) and it's been against the rules for users to do such things since day one of X-Box Live, the rules that every user has agreed to abide by.
The ESRB and Microsoft allowed
Black Ops to be published in the first place because it's perfectly acceptable for the Swastika to adorn Nazi uniforms in historical context, however it's not acceptable for users to go out of their way to create and display Swastika's for the sole purpose of causing offence.
It's not about Political Correctness, it's about having respect for fellow gamers and not trying to cause offence by choosing to display hate symbols associated with a racist and oppressive regime that is best know for the systematic murder of millions of people.
The only "prickery" at play is on the part of the people who have to be explicitly told not to create and display Swastikas, despite having already agreed not to do such things.