Blizzard: Valve Shouldn't Trademark DotA

Recommended Videos

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
Krion_Vark said:
First off you just posted something from Gamestop. Second trademarks do not necessarily mean money. Trademarks can also mean just getting your name attached to a product THATS IT. Whoopdi-fucking-do the characters are looking the same BIG FUCKING DEAL. So your telling me that if FFX and FFX-2 had completely different characters it would of been just fine? FUCK NO. Seriously if its in the same universe following the same principles I would expect there to be the same characters. Hell if Max Payne and Max Payne 2 had two completely different characters people would still buy it? Yes but they would complain like fuck about it. Hell we are giving Valve EXACTLY what they want from this because we are keeping the news relevant or did you not notice thats what people tend to do now? Kill me if I am wrong but that is what Bobby Kotick is keeping Activisions name in the news and relevant because they haven't really put out a good game recently. Hell Valve fans are getting pissed because Ep 3 isn't out yet. You can keep arguing that Valve is EVIL but all they are doing is keeping their name relevent indie developers do not have shit loads of resources to keep going if they start to lose money. Hell for all we know DoTA 2 could be a fucking code name and the pictures they send out completely false and then release some amazing game. WE HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING! Stop trying to act like you do.
It is from Game Informer? And they actually played it and Interview Valve... Did you even read it?

I HAVE CAPSLOCK AS WELL.

Do Blizzard TradeMark their Free maps? No.
Why Trademark something if you are not going to use the trademark... The Protection from Trademakr is about profit.
 

Krion_Vark

New member
Mar 25, 2010
1,700
0
0
Exort said:
It is from Game Informer? And they actually played it and Interview Valve... Did you even read it?

I HAVE CAPSLOCK AS WELL.

Do Blizzard TradeMark their Free maps? No.
Game Informer is owned and put out by gamestop.
Anyone can really trademark anything as long as they have reason to so it doesn't really matter what we think about it. Hell its now Activision-Blizzard vs Valve.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
Krion_Vark said:
Game Informer is owned and put out by gamestop.
Anyone can really trademark anything as long as they have reason to so it doesn't really matter what we think about it. Hell its now Activision-Blizzard vs Valve.
Very true, but trying to trademark doesn't mean it is going to pass, just saying.
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,591
0
0
No one's really addressing the point that Defence of the Ancients isn't being pursued. Just DOTA (in all caps, to boot).
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
Delusibeta said:
No one's really addressing the point that Defence of the Ancients isn't being pursued. Just DOTA (in all caps, to boot).
What do you think Dota stand for...
The whole community always refer Defence of the Ancients as Dota.

However Pendragon is trying to get the trademark for Defence of the Ancients after Valve is trying to get the trademark of Dota. Last time I check both of them have not passed yet. Time will tell.
 

Kaez

New member
Jan 11, 2010
128
0
0
The Bandit said:
I think Valve should just forget this nonsense and make Episode III.

No, I will not allow a single Valve thread to go by without some mention of Episode III. Sorry. : /
Meh it's not like Half Life is the best game out there. It's good, but can we move on. I'm sure there has been many games you've liked since HL Episode 2....

And if not, well wtf have you been doing for the many years since Episode 2 has come out XD. Keep doing it.

(If it was sex, well... your better off XD)
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,746
6
43
Country
USA
I'm not reading 11 pages of comments to see if anyone else is thinking the same thing, but I think Blizz needs to STFU. These comments are coming from the same company who put in their mapmaker EULA that Blizz owns all mods made for Starcraft 2. So all I'm hearing is them whining because they mustn't have had that clause in the War3 editor, or Valve would not have been able to pull this off.

To be fair, it is a little underhanded for Valve to trademark it, but if it becomes even greater like CS or TF because of the support Valve has, then the Warcraft 3 community needs to also STFU because some one did them a favor and made it better.
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,591
0
0
Exort said:
Delusibeta said:
No one's really addressing the point that Defence of the Ancients isn't being pursued. Just DOTA (in all caps, to boot).
What do you think Dota stand for...
Divided Over The Apocalypse? Death Of The Adversaries? Divisions Of The Andropia? Departments Of Terminal Altitude? Defenders Of The Artefacts? Destruction Of The Antagonisers? I could go on. The point is, I don't think Blizzard has a case to stand on that Valve can't hand-wave away in ten seconds.
 
Apr 15, 2009
6
0
0
All arguments aside, there are really only three outcomes here:

Valve gets the copyright, Blizzard gets the copyright, or Dota remains free.

Valve has a history of making people pay for (admittedly entertaining) mods, while Blizzard had the Ability to trademark Dota for years (It's in the Eula for the world editor) I personally prefer the third option though. Having several versions of Dota out would force Valve, Hon, and League of legends to be innovative and competitive.
 

Giest4life

The Saucepan Man
Feb 13, 2010
1,554
0
0
As an ardent fan of DotA, I'm really looking forward to Valve's version. Especially since it is rumored that IceFrog himself will be collaborating with valve. But I do agree with Blizzard, Valve should just piss off and not try to trademark that name.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
Signa said:
I'm not reading 11 pages of comments to see if anyone else is thinking the same thing, but I think Blizz needs to STFU. These comments are coming from the same company who put in their mapmaker EULA that Blizz owns all mods made for Starcraft 2. So all I'm hearing is them whining because they mustn't have had that clause in the War3 editor, or Valve would not have been able to pull this off.

To be fair, it is a little underhanded for Valve to trademark it, but if it becomes even greater like CS or TF because of the support Valve has, then the Warcraft 3 community needs to also STFU because some one did them a favor and made it better.
This is actually one of the developer answering a question. Because Blizzard is going to Release a free map called Blizzard DotA, so someone ask them if he know Valve is trademarking DotA. He answered he like valve's game but it is unlike valve to do such a thing. This all happen on live stream it is not the company's stand point or Actvision.

Blizzard own the SC2 map is because they are adding a feature called Battle.net Marketplace. Where User made map can be selled, so they have conturl over the maps. Just like Valve Mann Co. store they own thing sell there no matter if you design the item, in both case the designer do get a % of profit.

Also what give you the right to tell the War3 community shut up, Valve/IceFrog steal thier thing. If Valve/IceFrog Trademark DotA: Allstar then I would be ok,(as long Guinsoo(creator of DotA: Allstar) is good with it). But DotA belong to the community. Just because you have the biggest fan made DotA (that is DotA: Allstar) doesn't give you the name DotA.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
Giest4life said:
As an ardent fan of DotA, I'm really looking forward to Valve's version. Especially since it is rumored that IceFrog himself will be collaborating with valve. But I do agree with Blizzard, Valve should just piss off and not try to trademark that name.
It is not a rumor, IceFrog post it in his blog like 5 month ago about he is leading a team in Valve.
IceFrog later announced DotA 2 in his blog and his version of DotA site.
 

xxcloud417xx

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,658
0
0
GiantRedButton said:
well it sounds less that they think it should remain free and more like Blizzard want it.
They keep talking about it being available to the "blizzard community" etc.
Valve have Icefrog and it was his idea to get the trademark and make dota 2.
And icefrog is the authority when it comes to Dota, since he did most of the work. Blizz has no say in this since none of their employees were even part of the development process.

Anah said:
Somehow I can't see myself believing Blizzards mentioning this out of love for the community. Feels like an attempt at a "be the good guy" stunt to me.

... though I was a little curious about Valve and the whole trademarking DotA, all things considered (community focused project, etc...)
They seem to be doing the same thing they did with counter strike and Tf and portal.
They hire the modteam and trademark it.
Counter strike was a mod once too. And now valve owns the devs and trademark.
Took the words right out of my mouth. Valve hires modders, giving them resources to create higher budget versions of their mods. They've been doing this forever. As a major PC game developer Blizzard should know about how Valve operates (or then again they've probably been too busy counting their WoW money). This doesn't "mark Valve's coolness factor" for me like some other people seem to suggest... it's ridiculous to hate Valve for doing what they've always done and we've praised them for.

Simply put, get over it people, and get over it Blizzard, DotA was never "yours" to begin with. It could just as easily been a Source mod, and to suggest that Valve is taking it away from the Warcraft community, maybe you should just suck it up and remember that you took Warcraft away from the warcraft community by making it an MMORPG.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
The Jakeinator said:
It belongs to the community eh?

Shuddup Blizzard, Valve knows how to please the Community. Valve owns that shit know, get over it.
I was definely pleased when they released Mann Co. a Micro- transaction to a pull paid game, how nice of them.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
xxcloud417xx said:
Took the words right out of my mouth. Valve hires modders, giving them resources to create higher budget versions of their mods. They've been doing this forever. As a major PC game developer Blizzard should know about how Valve operates (or then again they've probably been too busy counting their WoW money). This doesn't "mark Valve's coolness factor" for me like some other people seem to suggest... it's ridiculous to hate Valve for doing what they've always done and we've praised them for.

Simply put, get over it people, and get over it Blizzard, DotA was never "yours" to begin with. It could just as easily been a Source mod, and to suggest that Valve is taking it away from the Warcraft community, maybe you should just suck it up and remember that you took Warcraft away from the warcraft community by making it an MMORPG.
You know Blizzard is actively hiring lot of Modder as well. For example, the Dev that is making Left 2 Die a free map by blizzard is a modder from WC3.
Also Warcraft is not dead, they said they have think about making Warcraft 4. But the RTS team spend the last 7 year on Starcraft 2, that is why they didn't have the time to consider making it.
Blizzard do know how Valve work, many of them said they are fan of Valve's games, but DotA is never Valve or IceFrogs's. IceFrog is not the creator of DotA or even DotA: Allstar.
The person from Blizzard that comment on this said he is a fan of valve's game as well.
He was asked the question on live stream. People ask him that question because Blizzard announced a free map called Blizzard Dota for Starcraft 2.
This is differnet from those MOD because Valve didn't hire the people that created DotA.
The creator of DotA is Eul, and the creator of DotA: Allstar is Guinsoo (later formed Riot games).
Funny you said DotA is not Blizzard or the community's but you don't say how that makes it Valve's. Because if it is not even community, how is it Valve's?

Finally, Valve haven't got the trademark yet. They just applied for it.
 

xxcloud417xx

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,658
0
0
Exort said:
xxcloud417xx said:
Took the words right out of my mouth. Valve hires modders, giving them resources to create higher budget versions of their mods. They've been doing this forever. As a major PC game developer Blizzard should know about how Valve operates (or then again they've probably been too busy counting their WoW money). This doesn't "mark Valve's coolness factor" for me like some other people seem to suggest... it's ridiculous to hate Valve for doing what they've always done and we've praised them for.

Simply put, get over it people, and get over it Blizzard, DotA was never "yours" to begin with. It could just as easily been a Source mod, and to suggest that Valve is taking it away from the Warcraft community, maybe you should just suck it up and remember that you took Warcraft away from the warcraft community by making it an MMORPG.
You know Blizzard is actively hiring lot of Modder as well. For example, the Dev that is making Left 2 Die a free map by blizzard is a modder from WC3.
Also Warcraft is not dead, they said they have think about making Warcraft 4. But the RTS team spend the last 7 year on Starcraft 2, that is why they didn't have the time to consider making it.
Blizzard do know how Valve work, many of them said they are fan of Valve's games, but DotA is never Valve or IceFrogs's. IceFrog is not the creator of DotA or even DotA: Allstar.
The person from Blizzard that comment on this said he is a fan of valve's game as well.
He was asked the question on live stream.
This is differnet from those MOD because Valve didn't hire the people that created DotA.
The creator of DotA is Eul, and the creator of DotA: Allstar is Guinsoo (later formed Riot games).
Funny you said DotA is not Blizzard or the community's but you don't say how that makes it Valve's. Because if it is not even community, how is it Valve's?

Finally, Valve haven't got the trademark yet. They just applied for it.
Never said it was Valve's because it isn't, and I don't see how that has to be a factor in pointing out that it's not Blizzard's either. However, if they get the Trademark it will be.

And I'm also assuming Left 2 Die is a Left 4 Dead game mode or w/e? If it is, I'll bet Valve isn't getting all bitchy about it.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
xxcloud417xx said:
Never said it was Valve's because it isn't, and I don't see how that has to be a factor in pointing out that it's not Blizzard's either. However, if they get the Trademark it will be.
They never said it belongs to them they said it belong to the community. Seriously Blizzard release 3 or 4 DotA style free map for Warcraft3 if they want to DotA trademark they worked on it.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,607
0
0
Well if Blizzard got the guy who created it in the first place maybe it wouldn't be in this mess.
 

xxcloud417xx

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,658
0
0
Exort said:
xxcloud417xx said:
Never said it was Valve's because it isn't, and I don't see how that has to be a factor in pointing out that it's not Blizzard's either. However, if they get the Trademark it will be.
They never said it belongs to them they said it belong to the community. Seriously Blizzard release 3 or 4 DotA style free map for Warcraft3 if they want to DotA trademark they already got it.
If they haven't Trademarked it, then no it doesn't belong to anyone. If Valve gets the TM then Valve will officially own the title and no matter how many DotA maps Blizzard made in the past will not matter. It was up to them to Copyright it when they had the chance. Sucks to be them.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
Nouw said:
Well if Blizzard got the guy who created it in the first place maybe it wouldn't be in this mess.
Well valve didn't got the guy the created DotA or DotA: allstar.