Assuming that mom is down with violence, but not sex - which, to be fair, is a pretty American attitude - she should still have perhaps guessed that this wasn't meant for her little one.archvile93 said:Well that would imply lots of violence, not nudity. Or is that guy naked on the cover too?Susan Arendt said:Especially given the skeleton with a scythe right on the cover.Straying Bullet said:The mother is a fool, at least briefly scan the content to be sure what you are buying is actually child-friendly.
Either way, I am glad they haven't sued the store for it.
One that prefers NIGHTMARE mode.Woodsey said:Alright, so being 10 he may not care about the tits (cartoons don't do it for me anyway) but what sort of 10-year-old boy turns down ultra violence?!
I have to set the record straight. Mormons are NOT polygamists. There are unfortunately a SMALL few who are RADICALS just as in the muslim and christian religions. These people bend religious doctrines and historical events to their own sick ideologies. The people who are polygamists are excommunicated from the mormon church which does not believe in nor condone these radical ideals. Also to be clear I myself am not mormon nor religious I just don't appreciate religions being slammed for the deeds of a few. Mormon Muslim Christian or otherwise.Keenanr1234 said:WHAT? Ok before everyone goes "ZOMG MORMON FREEKING OUT ABOUT HIS RELIGION" im an atheist. Mormons are polygamists... they has lots of boobies. Kay? Kaydsmops2003 said:You have to understand Ogden Utah is right next to Salt Lake City which is the heart of Mormon country. To them that shit is offensive.
true... since i do live in utah and even then i find this shit stupid and not even worth telling the news...dsmops2003 said:You have to understand Ogden Utah is right next to Salt Lake City which is the heart of Mormon country. To them that shit is offensive.
Well you got me there.Susan Arendt said:Assuming that mom is down with violence, but not sex - which, to be fair, is a pretty American attitude - she should still have perhaps guessed that this wasn't meant for her little one.archvile93 said:Well that would imply lots of violence, not nudity. Or is that guy naked on the cover too?Susan Arendt said:Especially given the skeleton with a scythe right on the cover.Straying Bullet said:The mother is a fool, at least briefly scan the content to be sure what you are buying is actually child-friendly.
Either way, I am glad they haven't sued the store for it.
Anyway, putting all of that aside, ok, so kid picks up comic with objectionable material. Mistake made, fine. Either toss the comics in the trash or take them back to the store. Don't alert the media, for crying out loud. That's just ridiculous.
Is that clever satire or are you just crazy?Mechsoap said:thats very true, i find breasts much more sutable since it doesent hurt theyr brain, only learns them
SNIP
couse hes a retard thats afraid of women and will die as a virgin
Oh dear. A mother bought her son a sealed "family friendly" collection of comic books which later turned out to contain content / themes that she found inappropriate for her child. What is the world coming to! Sound the crazzzzzy alarm! -_-Revelo said:This just beggars belief, everytime you think human stupidity can't get any worse, something like this happens.