Bureaucracy-Em-Up

Psychobabble

. . . . . . . .
Aug 3, 2013
525
0
0
Piecewise said:
Psychobabble said:
Mad respect for you taking the time to make the apology to the transsexual community. I feel it shows true class. It seems in these dark days we have to broaden our minds and think more about the feelings of others so we can refrain from our words causing unintended hurt. And if that means the loss of our freedom to personal self expression, I feel its worth it to help better humanity as a whole. On that note Yahtzee, do you think you could ratchet down the profanity in the future? It doesn't bother me but I like to watch your show on my iPad while having tea with my Gran and it seems to bother her quite a lot.
I have an idea. If your grandmother doesn't like swearing, maybe you should just not watch things that have swearing in them? Rather then asking everyone to change to fit your desires?


[SELF CENSORED TO PROTECT THE FEELINGS OF ABOMINATION]
 

Plunkies

New member
Oct 31, 2007
102
0
0
Make sure you water down your comedy for professional victims and their phony outrage, that's what all great comedians do. They apologize and grovel instead of letting their material stand on its own context and intentions.

It's not like anyone watches your videos because you speak your mind and you aren't afraid of offending anyone. I say good riddance to the old biting, poignant, unique Yahtzee. I look forward to future spineless Yahtzee, where there's never any provocative language, no one is ever upset, and we're all lulled into a gentle nap by soft, inoffensive jokes.
 

Genocidicles

New member
Sep 13, 2012
1,747
0
0
Zeldias said:
That's not an attempt to insult you, but to say that this kind of thinking is immature as fuck.
How so? How is it fair that some targets are fair game for comedy, but others aren't?

And isn't the point of comedy to speak truth to power? Or do you find it funny to abuse the abused? If that's the case, you must find reading about injustices that occur in the world hilarious.
I don't laugh at bad things on the news if that's what you're getting at. Some funny jokes can come from tragedies and injustices though.

If people are hurt by a thing, just because it was supposed to be funny doesn't make it excusable.
Just because people are hurt by a thing doesn't mean they can whine until it goes away, especially when they've been perfectly fine with things that hurt other people.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
Psychobabble said:
A rational proposal.
Most certainly is... oh you're still talking?
However that would only save my own Gran from being sworn at. How many other innocent individuals have been inadvertently harmed as a result of Yahtzee's third party profanity? How many elderly bystanders have been wounded by one of his Laissez-faire double entendres?

No I'm afraid the only way to insure the safety of everyone is to remove the offending profanity at its source.
Are you being serious? "Safety"? This isn't some workplace danger or a virus. It's a guy who makes scathing jokes about video games.

Safe from being wounded by an analogy... I hope you're joking.
 

martyrdrebel27

New member
Feb 16, 2009
1,320
0
0
Anyone who complained is the problem. Seriously. Anyone who gets offended by ANYTHING EVER needs to stop and consider context or intent, or the person behind the statement. Ugh. Yahtzee should never have had to apologize. And since when is "tranny" derogatory? Its a shortened version of transgender. That reminds me of people who feel the need to be offended when you refer to someone as a Jew instead of Jewish... Fuuuuuck, I really start to hate you humans sometimes.
 

kingpocky

New member
Jan 21, 2009
169
0
0
Abomination said:
I'll be certain to complain about every single potentially hurtful thing Yahtzee says about any group in his next video... and expect a full apology and edit to that video the following week.

I do not see how the pre-op dicksucking is offensive at all. Yes, they're women but they also have penises and for someone to claim to not be gay but suck penises is a bit of a strange disconnect and a sign the individual is pretty confused about their SEXuality. Denying their homoSEXuality on a technicality.

Or can the knee-jerkists of the trans community not see how someone having a penis might create a bit of a strange SEXual scenario when a male homophobe specifically seeks them out to please?

Edit: I guess I had better add emphasis to the word "sex" in this post so people don't get confused that I'm talking about the sexual act of sucking a man giving sexual pleasure to a penis - a male sexual object.
Did you read what Yahtzee said? While he disagreed about people taking offense to the word "trannies" regardless of context, his response to criticism of his pre-op transexuals joke was basically "Hmm, you're right, I could have worded that better. Let me clarify. Sorry if I offended you, that wasn't my intention."

No one was holding a gun to his head. No one threatened to take away his show or do anything bad to him. If he disagreed and wanted to argue with that, fine, but why are you trying to defend him on something that by all appearances, he actually thinks he was a bit in the wrong? Seems a bit . . . knee-jerk?
 

Moth_Monk

New member
Feb 26, 2012
819
0
0
For fuck's sake. WHY DID YOU APOLOGISE? YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO APOLOGISE FOR A JOKE! If you people want to be tolerated why can't you show some fucking tolerance for once and take a joke on the chin?! FUCK.
 

Psychobabble

. . . . . . . .
Aug 3, 2013
525
0
0
Abomination said:
Psychobabble said:
A rational proposal.
Most certainly is... oh you're still talking?
However that would only save my own Gran from being sworn at. How many other innocent individuals have been inadvertently harmed as a result of Yahtzee's third party profanity? How many elderly bystanders have been wounded by one of his Laissez-faire double entendres?

No I'm afraid the only way to insure the safety of everyone is to remove the offending profanity at its source.
Are you being serious? "Safety"? This isn't some workplace danger or a virus. It's a guy who makes scathing jokes about video games.

Safe from being wounded by an analogy... I hope you're joking.

Yes and one of those jokes apparently hurt enough peoples feelings that the resulting backlash made Yahtzee feel he needed to issue both an explanation and apology.

I'm simply offering advice on how he could further protect himself from future incidents by changing his style to a more open and universally friendly format. I truly apologize if that offer of advice offends you as it was in no way my intention.
 

Whispering Cynic

New member
Nov 11, 2009
356
0
0
I find it absolutely ridiculous that people who get "offended" by spoken words still get taken seriously. That a video gets retroactively censored, changed just because someone can't take a joke. It's words for crying out loud, listening to them can't cause your arms to fall off, can't infect you with cholera.

They are just words, and being able to ignore them if you don't like them is a pretty important part of adulthood.
 

WhiteFangofWhoa

New member
Jan 11, 2008
2,548
0
0
Betrayal is supposedly the deepest circle (9th) but not one of the cardinal sins. For the mixed-sin situation you described I think Greed would be a better fit-all. It seems to overlap with most of the others like Lust or Gluttony.

Interesting idea. Such a game would be completely justified in putting time limits on you too given how many souls would be sent your way in the average day, and if your lineup gets too long you get fired or something. Might be even more effective if in more challenging levels your patrons had all sorts of lengthy stories trying to mitigate their sins, some good and some flimsy.

Suggested name: Gatekeeper.
 

Strain42

New member
Mar 2, 2009
2,720
0
0
Genocidicles said:
Zeldias said:
That's not an attempt to insult you, but to say that this kind of thinking is immature as fuck.
How so? How is it fair that some targets are fair game for comedy, but others aren't?

And isn't the point of comedy to speak truth to power? Or do you find it funny to abuse the abused? If that's the case, you must find reading about injustices that occur in the world hilarious.
I don't laugh at bad things on the news if that's what you're getting at. Some funny jokes can come from tragedies and injustices though.

If people are hurt by a thing, just because it was supposed to be funny doesn't make it excusable.
Just because people are hurt by a thing doesn't mean they can whine until it goes away, especially when they've been perfectly fine with things that hurt other people.
I agree with this guy. I acknowledge that transgender people have it rough in the world right now, and I can empathize with that, but is Yahtzee really the source we need to go after on this? He's been doing this for 6 years now, and I just find it very peculiar that THIS was apparently the straw that broke the camel's back. When Yahtzee has already made jokes about tons of other races, ethnicities, genders, sexualities, physical handicaps, mental disabilities, ages, and animals. It's just kinda hard to imagine someone who has apparently been perfectly fine with everything Yahtzee has ever said up until now but found this to be going too far as anything other than slightly hypocritical. Let us remember, this is the comedian who has said the following lines (and these are just off the top of my head)

"And another thing, I think Hitler was right!"
"Also the game is from Japan and everyone knows what a bunch of xenophobic dicks they are."
"Not that they'd know anything about work, the lazy ni-"

Among many others.

And one of his Call of Duty episodes (I think it was Black Ops 2) basically being less of a game critique and more a 6 minute long rant insulting America. Though to be fair, Blops2 also has over 500 comments on it, so I think that may have been a case where people did get upset. Still though, it apparently wasn't enough to warrant the episode being changed.

But all of that is apparently moot. People got offended, expressed those concerns (some classier than others) and Yahtzee has extended the olive branch, made a sincere apology, and changed the joke. Now that's just plain decent of him. Far more decent than a lot of the people who commented their disgust on the video thread.

Isn't Yahtzee making a transgender joke the exact same way he would make a joke about anyone else sort of what the entire goal of the LBGT movement is? To live in a world where we're all treated as equals? Well part of that is realizing that you're fair game for satirical jokes, just like everyone else.

I'm not saying people shouldn't be offended when someone makes an insensitive comment about a certain group or that anyone who was offended should just "suck it up". I just think a comedian who has been known for saying insensitive comments about certain groups for six years now is a weird place to start a battle.
 

thethird0611

New member
Feb 19, 2011
411
0
0
Covarr said:
What's with the apology? If any other group had been offended, there wouldn't be an apology. Christians, women, Americans, Mexicans, Nintendo fans, space marines, etc... When you make a point of offending as many different groups of people as you consistently do, it weakens your persona to apologize to one group just because they're currently more politically correct at the moment.

Remember that time Isaac Hayes had no trouble making fun of absolutely everyone, but when South Park did an episode on Scientology, he quit? That's kinda how this seems.

P.S. Thanks
It is quite funny. I am a Christian, and when I hear a religion joke, I always get 'irked' about it, but I try to find the comedy in it, and even if I dont agree with it, well, oh well. Comedy shouldn't have boundaries because people get uncomfortable about ones that may apply to them.

So, I think from now on if I hear a joke about Christians in any video on the Escapist, im not going to try to find the comedy in it, I get enough shit about it on the Escapist if I even mention it. Thats exactly what this is telling me.
 
Feb 22, 2009
715
0
0
You're one of the good guys, Yahtzee. I could see what you were going for with the joke but, like you said, poor phrasing. Glad you treated the issue with maturity.

Whispering Cynic said:
I find it absolutely ridiculous that people who get "offended" by spoken words still get taken seriously. That a video gets retroactively censored, changed just because someone can't take a joke. It's words for crying out loud, listening to them can't cause your arms to fall off, can't infect you with cholera.

They are just words, and being able to ignore them if you don't like them is a pretty important part of adulthood.
If you think words are such completely powerless, meaningless things, why post on a forum?
 

DiamanteGeeza

New member
Jun 25, 2010
240
0
0
I'd never heard of this game but was intrigued enough to buy it. It's astonishingly addictive, and has some really neat little thought-provoking touches in it, like when a guy comes through with valid papers and tells you to look out for his wife a few people behind him. When she finally shuffles up, guess what? Invalid papers. Do you separate a husband and wife, or take a rap on the knuckles for letting in an illegal?

It's not a game that you can pick up and put down though. Once you start playing, you'll be sucked into it for hours without realizing.

One thing did occur to me though - if he does take it to consoles in the future, it might be one of the few sensible uses of the Wii-U controller, which could act as your desk, while the person and interview booth is on the main screen.
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
Psychobabble said:
Mad respect for you taking the time to make the apology to the transsexual community. I feel it shows true class. It seems in these dark days we have to broaden our minds and think more about the feelings of others so we can refrain from our words causing unintended hurt. And if that means the loss of our freedom to personal self expression, I feel its worth it to help better humanity as a whole. On that note Yahtzee, do you think you could ratchet down the profanity in the future? It doesn't bother me but I like to watch your show on my iPad while having tea with my Gran and it seems to bother her quite a lot.
The satire here is beautiful...

Unless it's not satire. Then I have some harsh words for you that Gran probably should cover her ears for.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
kingpocky said:
Abomination said:
I'll be certain to complain about every single potentially hurtful thing Yahtzee says about any group in his next video... and expect a full apology and edit to that video the following week.

I do not see how the pre-op dicksucking is offensive at all. Yes, they're women but they also have penises and for someone to claim to not be gay but suck penises is a bit of a strange disconnect and a sign the individual is pretty confused about their SEXuality. Denying their homoSEXuality on a technicality.

Or can the knee-jerkists of the trans community not see how someone having a penis might create a bit of a strange SEXual scenario when a male homophobe specifically seeks them out to please?

Edit: I guess I had better add emphasis to the word "sex" in this post so people don't get confused that I'm talking about the sexual act of sucking a man giving sexual pleasure to a penis - a male sexual object.
Did you read what Yahtzee said? While he disagreed about people taking offense to the word "trannies" regardless of context, his response to criticism of his pre-op transexuals joke was basically "Hmm, you're right, I could have worded that better. Let me clarify. Sorry if I offended you, that wasn't my intention."

No one was holding a gun to his head. No one threatened to take away his show or do anything bad to him. If he disagreed and wanted to argue with that, fine, but why are you trying to defend him on something that by all appearances, he actually thinks he was a bit in the wrong? Seems a bit . . . knee-jerk?
You know full well he's apologizing because someone complained, not because he went back over his video with a fine tooth comb.

Yes, I read what he posted. That's why I'm commenting in this very thread. I'm saying there's no need at all for him to apologize and you can't think for a moment that there would be any apology if someone didn't get upset about a non-offensive comment.

He didn't make fun of transsexuals in any way, he made fun of a hypothetical homophobe.

There was nothing to apologize for and those who got upset have a serious projection issue.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
Psychobabble said:
Abomination said:
Psychobabble said:
A rational proposal.
Most certainly is... oh you're still talking?
However that would only save my own Gran from being sworn at. How many other innocent individuals have been inadvertently harmed as a result of Yahtzee's third party profanity? How many elderly bystanders have been wounded by one of his Laissez-faire double entendres?

No I'm afraid the only way to insure the safety of everyone is to remove the offending profanity at its source.
Are you being serious? "Safety"? This isn't some workplace danger or a virus. It's a guy who makes scathing jokes about video games.

Safe from being wounded by an analogy... I hope you're joking.

Yes and one of those jokes apparently hurt enough peoples feelings that the resulting backlash made Yahtzee feel he needed to issue both an explanation and apology.

I'm simply offering advice on how he could further protect himself from future incidents by changing his style to a more open and universally friendly format. I truly apologize if that offer of advice offends you as it was in no way my intention.
I guess you better go back and change what offends me about your post. Gotta change the source, you know? That takes priority.
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
I really don't like that Yahtzee had to apologize and censor his video because of that joke.

I've said it before and I'll no doubt say it again, we will get nowhere unless everyone is treated equally, we can't be having this entire "You can't say this because that group is oppressed"*, that just harbors ill-will and allows people to abuse their immunity by being hateful without fear of reprisal or criticism and labeling any that do criticize as bigoted in some way or another.

It is that which hurts and upsets me personally the most, I have found more and more recently that my being born who I am (straight, white, and male) has made my opinions worth nothing and automatically earns me the disdain and sometimes hatred of supposed equal rights activists; it has gotten to the point that I've written and rewritten this post several times and am still debating whether it is worth me posting it.

[small]* This isn't to say when someone says something with genuine hateful intent behind it they shouldn't be called out.[/small]
 

kingpocky

New member
Jan 21, 2009
169
0
0
Abomination said:
kingpocky said:
Abomination said:
I'll be certain to complain about every single potentially hurtful thing Yahtzee says about any group in his next video... and expect a full apology and edit to that video the following week.

I do not see how the pre-op dicksucking is offensive at all. Yes, they're women but they also have penises and for someone to claim to not be gay but suck penises is a bit of a strange disconnect and a sign the individual is pretty confused about their SEXuality. Denying their homoSEXuality on a technicality.

Or can the knee-jerkists of the trans community not see how someone having a penis might create a bit of a strange SEXual scenario when a male homophobe specifically seeks them out to please?

Edit: I guess I had better add emphasis to the word "sex" in this post so people don't get confused that I'm talking about the sexual act of sucking a man giving sexual pleasure to a penis - a male sexual object.
Did you read what Yahtzee said? While he disagreed about people taking offense to the word "trannies" regardless of context, his response to criticism of his pre-op transexuals joke was basically "Hmm, you're right, I could have worded that better. Let me clarify. Sorry if I offended you, that wasn't my intention."

No one was holding a gun to his head. No one threatened to take away his show or do anything bad to him. If he disagreed and wanted to argue with that, fine, but why are you trying to defend him on something that by all appearances, he actually thinks he was a bit in the wrong? Seems a bit . . . knee-jerk?
You know full well he's apologizing because someone complained, not because he went back over his video with a fine tooth comb.

Yes, I read what he posted. That's why I'm commenting in this very thread. I'm saying there's no need at all for him to apologize and you can't think for a moment that there would be any apology if someone didn't get upset about a non-offensive comment.

He didn't make fun of transsexuals in any way, he made fun of a hypothetical homophobe.

There was nothing to apologize for and those who got upset have a serious projection issue.
No, there's no *need* for him to apologize. But it appears that he has done so anyway. If he didn't want to apologize, that'd be his right, and I'd fight to defend it.

When someone says "Hey, that's offensive" you can tell them to fuck off. You can also consider if it was offensive, and clarify what you meant. Yahtzee did the latter. He's not under any pressure to be inoffensive, is he? His whole shtick is edgy enough that it's not something he needs to care about.

To paraphrase something he said about Nintendo once, why are so many people here trying to jump to his defense? Yahtzee doesn't care about easily offended people, and he cares even less about you.