was the bus moving when she hit him? becuase then the driver can be seen as defending the innocent passangers from an idoit trying to crash the bus,,,,
The bus driver doesn't have psychic abilities. He didn't know if she'll hit her head on the ground or not when he punched her. My argument isn't just that 'she could have died' but that she also could have sustained other non-lethal but serious injuries. There is nothing idiotic about trying to get people understand that violent acts can lead to very serious consequences and that therefore you shouldn't punch, hit or kick anyone unless it's absolutely necessary.kahyonhowanen said:The difference being that in all three of those incidents they died because of the combined force of the punch and slamming their head into the ground, and judging by the way she fell, that doesn't seem like her head could have. Infact, the whole purpose of the uppercut is to incapacitate someone by dealing shock damage, so the chance of being killed by one is minimal.
Hell, if you want to stick to the idiotic "but she could die" argument, she assaulted a bus driver, while he was driving which could have caused him to crash and kill everyone on the bus.
What should he have done instead?Uhura said:The bus driver doesn't have psychic abilities. He didn't know if she'll hit her head on the ground or not when he punched her. My argument isn't just that 'she could have died' but that she also could have sustained other non-lethal but serious injuries. There is nothing idiotic about trying to get people understand that violent acts can lead to very serious consequences and that therefore you shouldn't punch, hit or kick anyone unless it's absolutely necessary.
This also isn't a competition. The girl was being an asshole and she endangered the other passengers by distracting the driver. That doesn't give the driver the right to react to the situation with excessive force.
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhzCVM2oOs7f35xwUaneverarine said:was the bus moving when she hit him? becuase then the driver can be seen as defending the innocent passangers from an idoit trying to crash the bus,,,,
you keep dealing with "could have" type scenario's, CLEARLY if you watch the video (hell there are multiple versions) she takes one solid uppercut, he attempts to toss her out, she tries to get back on for more, he grabs her and tries to toss her out but she wasn't budging so he tossed her down instead.Uhura said:The bus driver doesn't have psychic abilities. He didn't know if she'll hit her head on the ground or not when he punched her. My argument isn't just that 'she could have died' but that she also could have sustained other non-lethal but serious injuries. There is nothing idiotic about trying to get people understand that violent acts can lead to very serious consequences and that therefore you shouldn't punch, hit or kick anyone unless it's absolutely necessary.kahyonhowanen said:The difference being that in all three of those incidents they died because of the combined force of the punch and slamming their head into the ground, and judging by the way she fell, that doesn't seem like her head could have. Infact, the whole purpose of the uppercut is to incapacitate someone by dealing shock damage, so the chance of being killed by one is minimal.
Hell, if you want to stick to the idiotic "but she could die" argument, she assaulted a bus driver, while he was driving which could have caused him to crash and kill everyone on the bus.
This also isn't a competition. The girl was being an asshole and she endangered the other passengers by distracting the driver. That doesn't give the driver the right to react to the situation with excessive force.
Being yelled at vehemently while driving was danger enough. People get fined for driving while on a cell phone these days for a reason. She was distracting him viciously. I don't know about you but I'd say the average person would have a hard time concentrating on driving while someone takes backseat driving to the level of making threats of assault.Uhura said:http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhzCVM2oOs7f35xwUaneverarine said:was the bus moving when she hit him? becuase then the driver can be seen as defending the innocent passangers from an idoit trying to crash the bus,,,,
The pushing/punch occurs around the 3 minute mark in the video. The bus wasn't moving at the time.
Yes because you know, he totally could have handled it some other way right? We can see from the video that if he told her to get off, she would not listen, so that's out. If he called the police he would have had to stop the bus and depending on their location at the time and the dispatcher who receives the call that could take 10-20 minutes, not counting anytime the police will need to question everyone on the bus. This of course could cause many people to be late to where they were trying to get to, inconveniencing everyone, so that's out. He could keep driving, but I think it's obvious why that's out. Can you think of any more, cause nothing else comes to mind at the moment.Uhura said:The bus driver doesn't have psychic abilities. He didn't know if she'll hit her head on the ground or not when he punched her. My argument isn't just that 'she could have died' but that she also could have sustained other non-lethal but serious injuries. There is nothing idiotic about trying to get people understand that violent acts can lead to very serious consequences and that therefore you shouldn't punch, hit or kick anyone unless it's absolutely necessary.kahyonhowanen said:The difference being that in all three of those incidents they died because of the combined force of the punch and slamming their head into the ground, and judging by the way she fell, that doesn't seem like her head could have. Infact, the whole purpose of the uppercut is to incapacitate someone by dealing shock damage, so the chance of being killed by one is minimal.
Hell, if you want to stick to the idiotic "but she could die" argument, she assaulted a bus driver, while he was driving which could have caused him to crash and kill everyone on the bus.
This also isn't a competition. The girl was being an asshole and she endangered the other passengers by distracting the driver. That doesn't give the driver the right to react to the situation with excessive force.
Boohoo. As far as I'm concerned when any adult is pushing or threatening another adult, they should simply expect a beatdown and any possible injury that may occur. The driver is not a psychic? What about the girl? What if instead of uppercutting her he took out a knife and gutted her because he is not a psychic but a psycho waiting to snap?Uhura said:The bus driver doesn't have psychic abilities. He didn't know if she'll hit her head on the ground or not when he punched her. My argument isn't just that 'she could have died' but that she also could have sustained other non-lethal but serious injuries. There is nothing idiotic about trying to get people understand that violent acts can lead to very serious consequences and that therefore you shouldn't punch, hit or kick anyone unless it's absolutely necessary.kahyonhowanen said:The difference being that in all three of those incidents they died because of the combined force of the punch and slamming their head into the ground, and judging by the way she fell, that doesn't seem like her head could have. Infact, the whole purpose of the uppercut is to incapacitate someone by dealing shock damage, so the chance of being killed by one is minimal.
Hell, if you want to stick to the idiotic "but she could die" argument, she assaulted a bus driver, while he was driving which could have caused him to crash and kill everyone on the bus.
This also isn't a competition. The girl was being an asshole and she endangered the other passengers by distracting the driver. That doesn't give the driver the right to react to the situation with excessive force.
I'd say that in a situation like that it's best to stop the bus as soon as someone starts to behave aggressively towards you or other passengers. That way you can make sure that you won't crash the bus if the situation escalates. Then it would be best to call the cops and try to calm down the situation verbally. Violence should be the last option and bus drivers shouldn't be expected to physically handle possibly dangerous passengers. That's not their job and it's unfair to put that expectation on them.Boris Goodenough said:What should he have done instead?
So you would have parked the bus, slowly, calmly and safely, and then just sat there and taken the punches, the spitting, the grabbing and the verbal abuse?Uhura said:I'd say that in a situation like that it's best to stop the bus as soon as someone starts to behave aggressively towards you or other passengers. That way you can make sure that you won't crash the bus if the situation escalates. Then it would be best to call the cops and try to calm down the situation verbally. Violence should be the last option and bus drivers shouldn't be expected to physically handle possibly dangerous passengers. That's not their job and it's unfair to put that expectation on them.Boris Goodenough said:What should he have done instead?
I'm dealing with 'could haves' since no one can predict the consequences of their violent acts with absolute certainty. That's why people are generally advised to try solve possibly threatening situations with non-violent methods. Even people in law enforcement are advised to try to defuse threatening situations verbally if possible. I really am glad that she didn't seem to get seriously hurt, because it would have been pretty awful if the driver had been thrown in jail for something like that. It seems like the girl had been tormenting him for a while and he just lost his temper.TeletubbiesGolfGun said:you keep dealing with "could have" type scenario's, CLEARLY if you watch the video (hell there are multiple versions) she takes one solid uppercut, he attempts to toss her out, she tries to get back on for more, he grabs her and tries to toss her out but she wasn't budging so he tossed her down instead.
clearly, if he was using "excessive force", she wouldn't be getting back up for more, and he would've kept beating her senseless.
he did one swift shock punch and tried to immediately toss her out the bus, there was nothing excessive about that. and don't give me that "but could have" crap, we are dealing with what ACTUALLY happened.
if you still think it wasn't excessive, i'll imply you to randomly get choked and spit on, and see how you react
exactly, and if you are dealing with "could haves" then you have to conduct ALL the could haves, as she could have caused an accident, she could have caused damage to him for grabbing him by the throat, she could have distracted him enough to hit someone in the road by harassing him for minutes at a time.Uhura said:I'm dealing with 'could haves' since no one can predict the consequences of their violent acts with absolute certainty. That's why people are generally advised to try solve possibly threatening situations with non-violent methods. Even people in law enforcement are advised to try to defuse threatening situations verbally if possible. I really am glad that she didn't seem to get seriously hurt, because it would have been pretty awful if the driver had been thrown in jail for something like that. It seems like the girl had been tormenting him for a while and he just lost his temper.TeletubbiesGolfGun said:you keep dealing with "could have" type scenario's, CLEARLY if you watch the video (hell there are multiple versions) she takes one solid uppercut, he attempts to toss her out, she tries to get back on for more, he grabs her and tries to toss her out but she wasn't budging so he tossed her down instead.
clearly, if he was using "excessive force", she wouldn't be getting back up for more, and he would've kept beating her senseless.
he did one swift shock punch and tried to immediately toss her out the bus, there was nothing excessive about that. and don't give me that "but could have" crap, we are dealing with what ACTUALLY happened.
if you still think it wasn't excessive, i'll imply you to randomly get choked and spit on, and see how you react
Yeah, that's why it would have been a good idea to stop the bus sooner. The situation clearly wasn't safe anymore.AzrealMaximillion said:Being yelled at vehemently while driving was danger enough. People get fined for driving while on a cell phone these days for a reason. She was distracting him viciously. I don't know about you but I'd say the average person would have a hard time concentrating on driving while someone takes backseat driving to the level of making threats of assault.
I disagree with your assessment that stopping the bus and waiting for the police to arrive would have been out of the question. The safety of the driver, the passengers and other people driving in that neighborhood is the priority. Being late half an hour is a small price to pay for that safety.kahyonhowanen said:Yes because you know, he totally could have handled it some other way right? We can see from the video that if he told her to get off, she would not listen, so that's out. If he called the police he would have had to stop the bus and depending on their location at the time and the dispatcher who receives the call that could take 10-20 minutes, not counting anytime the police will need to question everyone on the bus. This of course could cause many people to be late to where they were trying to get to, inconveniencing everyone, so that's out. He could keep driving, but I think it's obvious why that's out. Can you think of any more, cause nothing else comes to mind at the moment.
Also, please tell me how that was excessive force, he punched her once, enough to incapacitate her, and threw her off the bus. It's considered excessive if he had continued to hit her after he incapacitated her. That was in no way excessive.
Consider this though, what the fuck are the chances that she would just sit there and wait for the cops. Attempting to call the cops while she berated and attacked him would most likely only cause her to attempt to hurt him more. She punched him without warning. If you seriously think that everyone would be safer with her in the bus angry for 30 minutes then I don't know what else to say...Uhura said:Yeah, that's why it would have been a good idea to stop the bus sooner. The situation clearly wasn't safe anymore.AzrealMaximillion said:Being yelled at vehemently while driving was danger enough. People get fined for driving while on a cell phone these days for a reason. She was distracting him viciously. I don't know about you but I'd say the average person would have a hard time concentrating on driving while someone takes backseat driving to the level of making threats of assault.
I disagree with your assessment that stopping the bus and waiting for the police to arrive would have been out of the question. The safety of the driver, the passengers and other people driving in that neighborhood is the priority. Being late half an hour is a small price to pay for that safety.kahyonhowanen said:Yes because you know, he totally could have handled it some other way right? We can see from the video that if he told her to get off, she would not listen, so that's out. If he called the police he would have had to stop the bus and depending on their location at the time and the dispatcher who receives the call that could take 10-20 minutes, not counting anytime the police will need to question everyone on the bus. This of course could cause many people to be late to where they were trying to get to, inconveniencing everyone, so that's out. He could keep driving, but I think it's obvious why that's out. Can you think of any more, cause nothing else comes to mind at the moment.
Also, please tell me how that was excessive force, he punched her once, enough to incapacitate her, and threw her off the bus. It's considered excessive if he had continued to hit her after he incapacitated her. That was in no way excessive.
He punched her in the head without a warning. If you can't see the possible dangers in that, then I don't know what else to say...
Good luck with that. I hope you never kill anyone.Yan007 said:Boohoo. As far as I'm concerned when any adult is pushing or threatening another adult, they should simply expect a beatdown and any possible injury that may occur.
Yeah, stopping a moving vehicle when someone is distracting you is the recommended course of action I believe. If she continued to physically assault him, he obviously would have had the right to try to restrain her and defend himself. Within reason. I'm not 'hating on the poor dude'. He was in a shitty situation and the way he decided to deal with it led to even shittier situation because he got fired.Driekan said:So you would have parked the bus, slowly, calmly and safely, and then just sat there and taken the punches, the spitting, the grabbing and the verbal abuse?
Is this a picture of you?
http://www.startrek.com/legacy_media/images/200307/spock01/320x240.jpg
I don't think anyone is arguing about what the ideal, superhuman thing to do in this situation is. It's pretty obvious, and it's two things:
- Don't harass the driver in the first place
- Don't react in anger
But we're human. And hating that poor dude for being human strikes me as wrong.
I haven't at any point tried to defend her actions. What she did was stupid and dangerous. The reason why I don't address the possible consequences of her actions is that no one in this thread has cheered her on. Everyone seems to be aware of the possible consequences of her actions. Many, however, have cheered on the guy and I feel like they probably haven't given that much thought on how badly the situation could have turned out for him.TeletubbiesGolfGun said:exactly, and if you are dealing with "could haves" then you have to conduct ALL the could haves, as she could have caused an accident, she could have caused damage to him for grabbing him by the throat, she could have distracted him enough to hit someone in the road by harassing him for minutes at a time.
i think most people here would agree, if she was permanently damaged or he kept beating her, then yes, that would've been awful and taken too far, but at that point in time, especially with her spitting on him and grabbing him at the throat, she signed and dotted her name on that uppercut. you don't just put your hands on/spit on someone and not expect retaliation.
Are you sure she would have stayed in the bus if he had threatened to call the cops? You don't think she might have tried to escape? Even if that plan hadn't worked it would have been wise to even try it. Stop the bus and call the cops and see if she leaves or calms down. I don't understand why this suggestion seems to be so controversial.kahyonhowanen said:Consider this though, what the fuck are the chances that she would just sit there and wait for the cops. Attempting to call the cops while she berated and attacked him would most likely only cause her to attempt to hurt him more. She punched him without warning. If you seriously think that everyone would be safer with her in the bus angry for 30 minutes then I don't know what else to say...
You`re point is too hypothetical to argue against effectively. By the same way that you say, "call the cops and see if she calms down" I could throw in, "what if she doesn't calm down?, what if she pulled out a gun or knife, what if she hit him to a point where he lost control of the bus?"Uhura said:Are you sure she would have stayed in the bus if he had threatened to call the cops? You don't think she might have tried to escape? Even if that plan hadn't worked it would have been wise to even try it. Stop the bus and call the cops and see if she leaves or calms down. I don't understand why this suggestion seems to be so controversial.
I have nothing else to say, other than to offer as close to 100% agreement as I could possibly offer to anyone in this discussion.AzrealMaximillion said:-Snip-