You see, this is the real problem. For what ever reason, people have fooled themselves that the need to make labels for different types of animation simply based on its origin. This I find is cultured backwards in every way. Do we name different type of animation because they are from Canada, France, China, America, ect... No, but when its from Japan, WE CALL IT ANIME.rhodo said:I'm a major in Japanese language and culture.
So, here's my short answer: no.
Western people can copy anime. They can't, and they never will, make anime. End of story.
Anime isn't about the big eyes, the fancy hair, the crazy poses, or such. Anime is about culture. Not once in my life I saw a pseudo-anime made by Western people and was fooled into thinking it was really Japanese.
Which is ok, because if we really were able to make anime, we'd be Japanese.
Now I am ok with categorizing for the sake of categorizing, but what I mean its backwards are the the fans who some how feel simply that because it is from Japan, it is Superior and it can't do any wrong. Then watch episodes of Bleach. The type that watch in subtitles not because the dub did an awful job, since all dubs in their eyes are awful for not getting the "true meaning" of the two guys powering up and explaining why their moves failed. Note that most directors of anime would actually prefer you watch it as a dub because they never intended anyone to READ their movie. Lets not even get started that for all that culture talk, they know next to nothing about the actual culture of Japan.
As one anecdote I heard, "Critics like the movie until the found it it wasn't European.".