I'm just saying us as humans as a whole have learned a lot from wild animals. From fighting styles to what plants are safe to eat to how to hunt in packs until we learned it was more efficient raise cattle and farm crops than burn all of our energy chasing down game.Truth Cake said:So... what does martial arts have to do with the military? You kinda lost me in that transition...Low Key said:Tell that to the martial artists who learn animal styles. We get a lot of our traits from animals in the wild, and we are in fact animals ourselves. We just happen to be the most intelligent of them.
So if humans are animals just the same, then, say, a mouse's life and existence should be worth the same as any humans? Or are humans better than common animals in everything EXCEPT fighting wars? Considering I have yet to see lions declare war on eagles for stealing their prey or whatever, I think animals make more logical sense by being much simpler.
If you're living in America and you're second guessing this guy ^, you should get your ass kicked.StarCecil said:One would hope. But it's not even required for a student to say it.
Of course, I would definitely fight for a student's right not to say it.
a little bit, some Nazi soldiers are still uncounted for, but also if they didnt do what they had to it was a bullet to the head instead of imprisonment or worse a death camplostzombies.com said:Ever read about the Nuremberg trials?Skizle said:Most soldiers are just following orders. Some may not be willing to do, however they will because if they dont a long prison sentence awaits them
I was in the Marines and it Oorah for the Marines, and Hooah for the army.Matt Oliver said:a. its Horrah,
Actually, if you read carefully, you'll find that he AMENDED his statement from being "better" to being "more than" animals, "for better or worse" - a very subtle distinction but I think it's an important one...Probably meaning that we can create and destroy (or do good/evil) beyond the capacity of any animal...though you'll have to ask him if he means that exactly.Truth Cake said:*snip*
...New York Patrick, you may want to re-read your own post there, in the beginning of the third paragraph you said humans are superior, and then later you say we're no better and then right in the same paragraph you say we are better again? You seem to be contradicting yourself there...
Ugh... if it helps you, then tell me when elephants declare war on elephants- it was just an example of different peoples fighting each other, not many people can differentiate the many different elephant races, nationalities and cultures (see what I mean?)Qtoy said:Just out of curiousity, what's the human parallel for elephants declaring war on mosquitoes? Especially since those aren't the same sapient being.
And no. I understood your point, I just kinda dodged it in my response by mistake.
All the wars I can think of were declared for the interests of the group. Let's say that "A-Land" has a "MacGuffin" that helps drive a lot "B-Land" industries. "A-Land" eventually decides it's not in its best interest to continue the MacGuffin trade, so they cut off trade of the MacGuffins. This deprives "B-Land" of the MacGuffin, and the group begins a descent into poverty.
Poverty is bad and tends to hurt people. This results in "B-Land" exploring different ways of getting the MacGuffins.
It's obvious to "B-Land" that getting the MacGuffins would be made easiest by invading "A-Land". Moral qualms stop this, so they stop.
Eventually, "A-Land" gives reason for "B-Land" to attack them through one way or another. This allows "B-Land" to attack while having a hidden ulterior motive for attacking.
Now, you may be thinking that as I typed that, I completely lost my train of thought and just made an analogy and hoped that something would come out of it. If you thought that, you are totally correct. But, it worked. There is something.
Humans have morals. Animals (to the best of my knowledge) lack sapience and don't have morals. Morals hold humans back and keep humans from lashing out at others for the smallest wrongings. These morals also keep the moderate from allowing everyone from attacking due to lack of support.
I know this is a weak argument, but I did the best I could while half-asleep and a quarter zoned out.
Wow. I'm way off the original topic.
This may have already been pointed out, I haven't read all of the posts, but I'm fairly positive that the Marine warcry is 'Oorah!' and the Army warcry is 'Hoo-ah'. I may be mistaken about that and if I am I will readily admit wrongness.Matt Oliver said:a. its Horrah, just a way to say sure,fine,good for you, etc, and we americans hold our military in the highest standard, aside from a few nutjobs aka Westboro Baptist Church.
We are thankful that they have risked their lives to keep us safe. We destroy anyone who says shit about the armed forces! They are war heroes each and every single one of them.
Humans learned all that by watching the animals do what they do to survive- finding safe foods to eat and such is all fine and good, but when that knowledge is used to kill one's fellow man, it's application is unetical.Low Key said:I'm just saying us as humans as a whole have learned a lot from wild animals. From fighting styles to what plants are safe to eat to how to hunt in packs until we learned it was more efficient raise cattle and farm crops than burn all of our energy chasing down game.
Stopped reading here. Go walk down a dark alley with your purse and high morals but leave your gun behind.Truth Cake said:shouldn't having morals actually NOT make us raise giant armies and kill each other?