Me too. Though it's actually curious that the chinese government might give this a thumbs up, because Confy would have a thing or two to say about how they've been ruling their people.Jbird said:Forget Avatar; sign me up to the Confucius biopic with Chow Yun-Fat.
Thank you piracy! =DSneaklemming said:Piracy saves the day!
He also believed in a state rule based on virtue, while being strongly opposed to coercion as a form of crowd control.TsunamiWombat said:Confuscious believed in service to the state, no big suprise a film about him is big with the government.
So, it actually is a big damn surprise that the guvners down at China are supporting a biopic about him.
Well, not that I'm making Avatar as some form of revolutionary catalyst for gathering the masses in protest. Because I really think it's just a kind of pretty (but far too colored) film with good acting and a narrative which is extremely predictable.CommyGingerbreadMan said:OR OR OR, GET THIS, follow me with this one.
it could be JUST a movie? Huh anyone? Thought so. . .
But any vehicle for human expression which worries a government enough that they go about banning it in their own country doesn't seem to me like "just" something.
Just so I'm making myself clear, this is actually referring to art as a whole, not Avatar.
That seems about right.JayDub147 said:It's such a shame. Looking out for the good of everyone and valuing equality is an admirable goal; unfortunately, the creation of government necessitates an inherent inequality in order to institute any control. Then, instead of true communism, you get glorified fascism.