I dunno, maybe because movies are already seen in the public eye as a legit art form and games are not. Instead games are seen as dumb, violent and just petty amusement. So I think this ad is incredibly tone-deaf considering it was launched mere days after the SCOTUS hearing where games were falsely called out for being exactly like what this ad is portraying them to be: violent, without meanings, train people to be killers because hey, there's a soldier in all of us right!Epictank of Wintown said:Here's one question I have about this:
How is this commercial, this ad, ANY DIFFERENT AT ALL from some of the over-the-top, absolutely ridiculous action movies we've seen over the last few years?
Oh, right. It's for a video game. Clearly, that makes it the root of all evil.
The issue though is that this ad (and the game to a certain degree) reduces the job of a soldier to "a dude that runs around shooting people for fun".traukanshaku said:I've already seen some idiot news station complain about it, saying that the phrase "There's a soldier in all of us" is an insult to real soldiers, at which point I buried my face in my hands and despaired at being part of the human race. Really? Isn't that the fucking point of the military?.
I get annoyed with the Canadian ones all the time. And lest we forget, the American army made their own video game, to use as a propaganda tool. From what I heard, back when AA first came out, it worked well.summerof2010 said:That was actually my first reaction to it. You know what really gets me about all this? People get mad about video games portraying combat as all fun and games (10 days in Fallujah), but no one gets mad at the US military ad campaigns.
that's because you respawn after pressing x...Andy Chalk said:"The thud of recoil, the screams of rockets, the dust of explosions... and the look of exasperation on that little, shotgun-wielding girl. The only things missing are the dead bodies on the receiving ends of each bullet and blast."
yea but hes a noob and we all know that nubs get knocked on their assess with everything.LORD GREN said:I personally don't like the ad, but he's reading too much into it.(BTW the RPG-7 is a recoilless weapon, so it won't knock you on your ass like that.)
I agree with you about the back-slapping thing. It's the same way I feel when someone posts a video of a guy throwing a cat in a bin or whatever. Everyone rushes in to post their obvious comment about how he should rot in hell or whatever. It's like, can't we just assume that you feel that way until you say otherwise? At least after the first hundred comments to that effect. Say something thoughtful about it, don't just say yay or nay.chewbacca1010 said:snip
That columnist is seriously equating Hollywood-style war movie action to actual combat..? I'd find it mildly insulting if it weren't so damn funny. Those weren't real guns, and that wasn't a simulation of combat."This ad equips people with real guns and simulates real-life, no-CGI combat," Sam Machkovech wrote in a column for The Atlantic. "The thud of recoil, the screams of rockets, the dust of explosions... and the look of exasperation on that little, shotgun-wielding girl. The only things missing are the dead bodies on the receiving ends of each bullet and blast."