This is why we need to ban guns...Tanis said:*waits for the 'those people' to start preaching 'this is why we need to ban guns' crap*
No. STOP. Both of you.GoddyofAus said:It's purile and juvenile responses like this that allowed this, Columbine, Virginia Tech and every other massacre to happen in the first place.Tanis said:*waits for the 'those people' to start preaching 'this is why we need to ban guns' crap*
It's ironic you brought that up, because following that massacre, the Government at the time introduced tough new gun laws, and there hasn't been a massacre of its size in Australia since.Baldr said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_%28Australia%29STENDEC1 said:Queue all the conservative Americans who'll claim that this attack is in no way a just cause for tighter gun control. Rather the opposite. After all, if everyone had guns you'd have less shootings wouldn't you?
It's times like these I'm extremely pleased to live in Australia.
Yeah.
No of course not, it's never the time that's the problem. It's much easier for those with the agenda to sweep the issue under the rug under the guise of "prudence for the victims", but I tell you what; the moment those same victims move from grief to anger, you will be hearing a lot more of it.UNHchabo said:No. STOP. Both of you.GoddyofAus said:It's purile and juvenile responses like this that allowed this, Columbine, Virginia Tech and every other massacre to happen in the first place.Tanis said:*waits for the 'those people' to start preaching 'this is why we need to ban guns' crap*
This is not the time or place to debate politics. Go start your own thread.
I hope for a full recovery from all currently in the hospital. I feel for the families of those involved.
Fine. Maybe this is a good time to discuss it. Regardless, THIS THREAD is not the place. Some of us are looking for a factual account of what happened, because it happened less than 12 hours ago.GoddyofAus said:No of course not, it's never the time that's the problem. It's much easier for those with the agenda to sweep the issue under the rug under the guise of "prudence for the victims", but I tell you what; the moment those same victims move from grief to anger, you will be hearing a lot more of it.
true, true. bad enough Heath Ledger died after the previous one now this. make me sickStabby Joe said:This story offends me dearly. Not just as a sane human (that's already a given no doubt), no no. This also offends me as an avid cinema goer, Batman fan and as someone who likes socials. It's sad that all these went out because they wanted a good time with friends and/or family with a common interest and excitement... ruined and then some.
Seems to work pretty well over here in the UK. Although disarming everyone in the USA would be a nigh-impossible task now unfortunately.Tanis said:It's childish to think that 'banning all the guns' will stop criminals, or prevent massacres.
I will admit that this sort of thing is one of the reasons I'm against the death penalty. To do this there is clearly something psychologically wrong with the man and I'd rather not punish him because of some faulty wiring in his brain. I accept that he possibly won't fall under "has difficulty functioning" type of insane, but there is something up with the way he thinks. I just think he should be locked up away from everyone else to prevent it happening again and, if at all possible, treated.the doom cannon said:And this is one reason I advocate for the death penalty.
Probably the same kind who brought a baby to a sci-fi somewhathorror when I visited a theater in Manhattan.Novaova said:Who brings a four month-old baby to a midnight premiere of an action movie?John Funk said:The casualties included a four-month old baby who was released after being treated.
Well there we have the completely different issue of our respective countries (and their following history and culture). I mean I live in Denmark and I have a sneaking suspicion that it is because of the Danish culture that I can only see firearms in the hands of either Police or Military personnel (or crooks, and then there's hunters but they only use hunting rifles like the Model 700 or shotguns with room for two shells).cerebus23 said:Hornet0404 said:Boom.Tanis said:
Godwin's Law has once again been met.
Also I don't think that it's as much Gun Control to keep guns out of the hands of crooks but more to make it easier to lock them up (for possessing illegal firearms).
It is also true that in a "open" society it is impossible to prohibit things, it just creates a black market and encourages more crime. study the war on drugs for a text book case of trying to ban things in an open border nation.
Besides we need guns to overthrow our government, our forefathers said so because you know they kicked out an oppressive government that was overtaxing them, restricting their right to arm themselves, and telling them who and where they could meet and what they could talk about etc.
Plus i do not want to even bring up how every dictator pretty much disarmed his people before he took power, and the ego on some of our politicians and the idea of one of them getitng ideas of bigger better things is not out of the question.
I do not think anyone that is pro guns, is arguing that mentally insane people should be armed at all, but we have gun laws in place to regulate things like felons getting guns, mentally ill getting guns, and bottom line on top of that if someone really wants a gun there is a way to get one reguardless.
banning them would simply make them more expensive, and make them very attractive to organized crime, unless someone seriously wants to try and convince me we can shut down every square inch of our border, then you have to convince me the politicians would even do it because some of them like those illegals voting and paying taxes and etc.