...and that instantly ends the conversation right here.thethird0611 said:entitlement
...and that instantly ends the conversation right here.thethird0611 said:entitlement
That was my first reaction. PC gamers get the same game at a lower price (okay, this might depend on what the console version is doing where you live) with more content. Sure, PC gamers get it a lot later than consoles, but personally I'd be glad I'd get the game at all, what with From Software being a console developer. Rejoice! Enjoy the glory of Dark Souls!The Plunk said:"Oh no, 30 fps! Whatever will we doooooooooooooooooooooo?!"
The game was perfectly playable on consoles.
The game will be the same, if not slightly better, on PC.
Therefore it will be perfectly playable on PC.
this, but i think i'll shell out for it to show them some support, they've been honest and have at least tried, and they actually LISTENED to the petitions and support rather than toss it to the side like most dev/pubs do, so for that, they might have earned a sale out of me (plus i like in depth rpg's like this, so if it plays like it does on the console, i'm sure i'll be at least satisfied)Zaik said:I want to be irritated, but they've at least been completely honest about not having a fucking clue how to port to PC before they sold it.
I'm not really interested in it as is, maybe once it drops down in the $5 range and/or some modders that know how them newfangled personal computers work fix it up(and maybe as an added bonus rip all the GFWL garbage out of it like was made available for Fallout 3).
I personally think it's a very vocal minority that are kicking up a fuss about it so me being the optimist that I am have high hopes that From Software will port future games, I mean, all they need to do is make a reasonable profit on the port and they'll have the incentive to do the same with future games.Siegreich said:No after this they're probably just not going to make any ports no matter how hard you petition, good job pc gamers, having the same game just isn't enough for you.Ickorus said:Ungrateful? At least you didn't say ..entitled. *GASP* [http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7qtdetHGF1r9og92o4_250.gif]Daystar Clarion said:Indeed.Rabid Toilet said:This whole Dark Souls port thing is being blown way out of proportion.
News sites are making it out to be garbage that no one should buy, that the developers are rushing out a crappy port to make money, that the result is an unplayable mess. The reality is that PC gamers get the exact same game that consoles have. The exact same, perfectly playable, perfectly fine looking game we've been playing for so long.
But because the port isn't superior to the original, this is apparently unacceptable. Now, the game will likely not sell very well because of everyone being led to believe the port is crap. Say goodbye to getting PC ports of future titles. Apparently the same as everyone else just isn't good enough.
I don't want to toss around the term ungrateful, but...
Look, at best, it's going to have a lightly smoother framerate, with free DLC. While at it's worst, it's going to be exactly the same as the console version.
I don't see the issue here.
Yeah, pretty much the same as what you guys said. I enjoyed the game on the console so if it's basically the same thing but on PC I'm sure I'll manage to find a way to enjoy it.
Maybe this experience will help them improve any future ports they make.
Yeah, you're completely right.Siegreich said:No after this they're probably just not going to make any ports no matter how hard you petition, good job pc gamers, having the same game just isn't enough for you.
Pretty much this.Daystar Clarion said:You guys wanted Dark Souls, you're getting it, warts and all.
The game isn't going to be worse on PC, it's going to be exactly the same as the console version, the version you petitioned so hard to get.
![]()
And you get free DLC.
Weeeell....... hard luck From Software.Karloff said:Weeeell ... hard luck, PC gamers.
The problem is that it IS broken.The Plunk said:It's not broken. It is playable on consoles, so it will be playable on PC.BiH-Kira said:Wow... that's are really clear way to say "Don't buy our game."
Well, thanks for telling me that because I was thinking of pre-ordering it over Steam.
Yeah, you're completely right.Siegreich said:No after this they're probably just not going to make any ports no matter how hard you petition, good job pc gamers, having the same game just isn't enough for you.
Who gives me the right not to buy a game that is broken from the start. I'm really entitled for thinking that the product I bought should work.
It's people like you that give credit to the stereotype of entitled, whining, elitist PC gamers.
Wrong analogy is wrong.BiH-Kira said:The problem is that it IS broken.The Plunk said:It's not broken. It is playable on consoles, so it will be playable on PC.BiH-Kira said:Wow... that's are really clear way to say "Don't buy our game."
Well, thanks for telling me that because I was thinking of pre-ordering it over Steam.
Yeah, you're completely right.Siegreich said:No after this they're probably just not going to make any ports no matter how hard you petition, good job pc gamers, having the same game just isn't enough for you.
Who gives me the right not to buy a game that is broken from the start. I'm really entitled for thinking that the product I bought should work.
It's people like you that give credit to the stereotype of entitled, whining, elitist PC gamers.
If I bought Ferrari, I would expect from it to go faster than 40km/h.
Same as buying a game. I would expect from it to work as fast as it can on my PC. I didn't invest in my PC so that I can play shity ports.
They made millions of the game and they couldn't hire someone to do the port? And how am I whiny? Or entitled?
I didn't rage, I didn't swear, I didn't insult anyone.
The problem isn't in me, but in people like you. People who gladly give up their consumer rights and attack anyone who doesn't want to give 50 euro for a pile of shit.
Yes, it's a pile of shit. A game that will run in 1024x720 on 30 FPS...
I never asked for extra content, that by the way isn't free. The only thing I want from a port is to use my PC right. I want to be able to change my controls, to change my resolution and the most important part is, I don't want to play a Power Point slideshow.
If not buying something that I don't think is worth my money makes me entitled or whiny, well fuck. I'm entitled and whiny. If wanting a game to run smooth on my PC makes me a elitist, well, I'm an elitist.
But you, my friend, are a brainwashed consumer. I could say "thank you" for a bad gift (even tho I don't understand how someone could say it's a gift), but I sure as hell won't pay 50 euro for it.
But the average game runs on 1920x1080 60+ FPS on my PC, while this won't.The Plunk said:The difference is that a Ferrari costs much, much more than your average car, while this game does not cost any more than your average game.BiH-Kira said:The problem is that it IS broken.
If I bought Ferrari, I would expect from it to go faster than 40km/h.
Same as buying a game. I would expect from it to work as fast as it can on my PC. I didn't invest in my PC so that I can play shity ports.
They made millions of the game and they couldn't hire someone to do the port? And how am I whiny? Or entitled?
I didn't rage, I didn't swear, I didn't insult anyone.
The problem isn't in me, but in people like you. People who gladly give up their consumer rights and attack anyone who doesn't want to give 50 euro for a pile of shit.
Yes, it's a pile of shit. A game that will run in 1024x720 on 30 FPS...
I never asked for extra content, that by the way isn't free. The only thing I want from a port is to use my PC right. I want to be able to change my controls, to change my resolution and the most important part is, I don't want to play a Power Point slideshow.
If not buying something that I don't think is worth my money makes me entitled or whiny, well fuck. I'm entitled and whiny. If wanting a game to run smooth on my PC makes me a elitist, well, I'm an elitist.
But you, my friend, are a brainwashed consumer. I could say "thank you" for a bad gift (even tho I don't understand how someone could say it's a gift), but I sure as hell won't pay 50 euro for it.
Nope.Daystar Clarion said:Wrong analogy is wrong.
It's more like this.
Console gamers got exclusive access to a Ford GT.
PC gamers went 'Hey, that's a pretty good car, we want it too!'
So you got the car.
'What? This isn't a Ferrari! This is a Ford GT!'
'You asked for a Ford GT'
'Well duh! But I wanted a better one!'
Carnagath said:A classic case of "miscommunication", isn't it... When people asked for this game on the PC, they actually meant that they wanted a proper PC port, not a half-assed copy paste cash grab.
Actually, it does, because you do have a FASLE SENSE of entitlement. Just because of bunch of idiots threw it around, doesnt make it any less valid.Carnagath said:...and that instantly ends the conversation right here.thethird0611 said:entitlement
Buretsu said:The average PC game, maybe. But you're not getting a PC game, you're getting a port of a Console game.BiH-Kira said:But the average game runs on 1920x1080 60+ FPS on my PC, while this won't.
So every car in the analogy is a Ferrari. It's just that that one doesn't work as it should.
You're confused. There is nothing more anti-consumer than not letting people decided what is and is not OK with them. I'm not defending people who are attacking other people for not being interested, to avoid confusion. If you ever played the console version, you know these are actually massive improvements over it. Also, it said the frame rate drops were much better, so I'm guessing that you never played it.danon said:Wow the amount of anti-consumerism never ceases to amaze me here on the escapist. The locking to 30 fps and that the bugs and framedrops aren't fixed is applauded here just wow.
Also:The implication of a PC release is obviously that all these problems can be tackled by the brute force of a faster CPU, and though there are very light hitches here and there, it's a relief to say Blight Town now plays without all the constant chugging. The improvement is staggering to those that endured the treacle-like pace of the area on PS3 and 360, already making this version a winning proposition.
It honestly sounds to me that the PC version is far superior to the game that I played for 130 hours on my PS3.Due to the smoother, if limited, frame-rate, the PC version is also looking to be the definitive way to play the game, especially for those planning to jump in for the first time on August 24th.