Watchmen, the television show.
Damon Lindelof has been one of the more distinguished voices in American television for a while predating the more recent era of creator driven television by almost a decade and while it's debatable whether he is or has ever been a unique enough voice to justify his omnipresence in Hollywood it's undeniable that he has quite a bit of prestige. That might be the reason why he was chosen to spearhead a follow up to the massively influential and critically acclaimed graphic novel Watchmen, originally by Alan Moore, an author famously dismissive of all adaptations of his work. Lindelof's Watchmen is most definitely a project that aims high bit I'm not sure what it's aiming at, exactly.
For what it's worth, the graphic novel isn't exactly the timeless masterpiece it's sometimes made out to be, both its political commentary and it's genre commentary are a product of the 80s. One that has stood the test of time, sure, but both superheroes and politics have gone through various changes ever since the novel came out and Zack Snyder's late 00s adaptation, while well realized, didn't present much of a case for how Watchmen can fit into the new millenium.
Lindelof sure tries his hardest to drag the property into the 21st century kicking and screaming. Robert Redford is the president of the United States, a racist militia is terrorising the country, police are now wearing masks to protect themselves from assault, Vietnam is the 51st state... Ocassionally it feels like the show can offer pertinent social commentary but I feel like most of the time it's just being cute. Which is really what it comes down to,Watchmen gestures towards our current cultural anxieties but it has very little in terms of coherent commentary on them. It certainly has moments of being clever and witty but it's never exactly insightful.
The plot is not bad, not when it comes down to it, it's realitively tight, relatively unpredictable, follows a few compelling characters both old and new, standouts including Jeremy Iron's refreshingly eccentric take on an elderly Adrian Veidt and Tim Blake Nelson as drawling vigilante Looking Glass, and doesn't overstay its welcome wrapping up in 9 relatively well paced episodes.
I'm sure some people will consider HBOs Watchmen a much needed modernization of the classic comic book and I do respect a lot of its bolder decisions but now that it has ended I can't help but wonder if there was a greater point to it. What is Watchmen in 2019? A quirky dystopia? A parable about the nature of power? A liberal manifesto? A work of very well made fanfiction? An epilogue to a story that never felt like it needed one? It sure tries to be all of those things but it still struggles to justify its own existence. It was a wild ride for sure, sometimes even a fun one, but it doesn't manage to present a case for why the novel that was never meant to be a franchise has now become a franchise.
Damon Lindelof has been one of the more distinguished voices in American television for a while predating the more recent era of creator driven television by almost a decade and while it's debatable whether he is or has ever been a unique enough voice to justify his omnipresence in Hollywood it's undeniable that he has quite a bit of prestige. That might be the reason why he was chosen to spearhead a follow up to the massively influential and critically acclaimed graphic novel Watchmen, originally by Alan Moore, an author famously dismissive of all adaptations of his work. Lindelof's Watchmen is most definitely a project that aims high bit I'm not sure what it's aiming at, exactly.
For what it's worth, the graphic novel isn't exactly the timeless masterpiece it's sometimes made out to be, both its political commentary and it's genre commentary are a product of the 80s. One that has stood the test of time, sure, but both superheroes and politics have gone through various changes ever since the novel came out and Zack Snyder's late 00s adaptation, while well realized, didn't present much of a case for how Watchmen can fit into the new millenium.
Lindelof sure tries his hardest to drag the property into the 21st century kicking and screaming. Robert Redford is the president of the United States, a racist militia is terrorising the country, police are now wearing masks to protect themselves from assault, Vietnam is the 51st state... Ocassionally it feels like the show can offer pertinent social commentary but I feel like most of the time it's just being cute. Which is really what it comes down to,Watchmen gestures towards our current cultural anxieties but it has very little in terms of coherent commentary on them. It certainly has moments of being clever and witty but it's never exactly insightful.
The plot is not bad, not when it comes down to it, it's realitively tight, relatively unpredictable, follows a few compelling characters both old and new, standouts including Jeremy Iron's refreshingly eccentric take on an elderly Adrian Veidt and Tim Blake Nelson as drawling vigilante Looking Glass, and doesn't overstay its welcome wrapping up in 9 relatively well paced episodes.
I'm sure some people will consider HBOs Watchmen a much needed modernization of the classic comic book and I do respect a lot of its bolder decisions but now that it has ended I can't help but wonder if there was a greater point to it. What is Watchmen in 2019? A quirky dystopia? A parable about the nature of power? A liberal manifesto? A work of very well made fanfiction? An epilogue to a story that never felt like it needed one? It sure tries to be all of those things but it still struggles to justify its own existence. It was a wild ride for sure, sometimes even a fun one, but it doesn't manage to present a case for why the novel that was never meant to be a franchise has now become a franchise.