To all of those people that argued with me that "Anonymous" is not an "organization..."
I rest my mutha fucking CASE.
I rest my mutha fucking CASE.
Yeah, how dare those arrogant fuckers stand up for a guy getting scapegoated for something he didn't do just so some corporate suits can set a precedent that they own physical items in your house and that post-purchase EULA's trump national laws.Fox242 said:Figures. They try and make a "leaderless" collective and then a guy tries to take control (either way, someone was attempting to seize power here). I just hope this tears their organization apart. I've been getting quite sick of them and their support of GeoHot.
I wonder if there will be swearing this time. Yippie Ki-Yay!IndianaJonny said:So basically, we're all sat down eating our popcorn to a rerun of Die Hard 4."The only way to make things safe is to make users aware how insecure it is," claims Ryan thinq_ [//www.thinq.co.uk/2011/5/9/exclusive-anonops-splinter-group-speaks-out/]
Err... not exactly. The thing is, until now they usually just didn't take part in something if they weren't on the same side. Now they're actively attacking members of the other side.Tom Goldman said:(mass snip)
There have always been separate groups of Anonymous members, but until now they were usually on the same side. The "core" of Anonymous is currently trying to regain control, but what happens after that is anyone's guess.
(snip)
Haha, I like your style.GLo Jones said:That's exactly what happened, it started out just that stupid. Unfortunately, Anonymous' trolling nature simply caused it to snowball.Braedan said:I guess that serves me right for not researching neck-beard history before opening my mouth. I was under the impression they were just calling each other names about some girl in makeup though.GLo Jones said:People seem to be unaware that Anonymous has suffered from civil war before [http://boxxystory.blogspot.com/2009/01/rise-of-boxxy.html], and the last time lasted about 1-2 years. However, this was before various Anons were wanted individuals. So we'll see how quickly this conflict is crushed now the stakes are so high.
Plus, what are you implying? Are saying you don't care about the history of the basement dwelling neck-beards? What is this madness?!
Cookie for Dnd reference. Nicely done good sirCM156 said:For some reason, this reminds me of the Blood War... Lower Planes conflict is appropriate for this situation.
OT: Good. Again, never much a fan of Anon. Funny to watch though.
*grabs popcorn*
It seems to me that 'Ryan' is the one who is power hungry. If this was a general movement within Anonymous, then we wouldn't be hearing one guy's name. Why are Anonymous anti-Scientologist again? For the lulz, or because they're money hungry wierdos who take advantage of stupid people? Idk. If you're committed to keeping stupid people from making stupid decisions prepare for an endless battle that you can't win. I say focus on New Zealand.Simalacrum said:Yeah, they've been talking about this on separate Anonymous-associated forums like whyweprotest.net for a few days now... I even saw someone posting "Ryan"'s address and what his house looks like on the forums. General reaction looks to be very much negative against "Ryan", at least within the WWP community (WWP being the main body of the anti-Scientologist aspect of Anonymous).
Thank you, I didn't know how many people would get it.Doom-Slayer said:Cookie for Dnd reference. Nicely done good sirCM156 said:For some reason, this reminds me of the Blood War... Lower Planes conflict is appropriate for this situation.
OT: Good. Again, never much a fan of Anon. Funny to watch though.
*grabs popcorn*![]()
It was a shitstorm of epic proportions. Moot had a bunch of words even remotely related to Boxxy set to automatically permaban, and even then 4chan was crippled, dancing on and off for at least a month.Braedan said:Haha, I like your style.GLo Jones said:That's exactly what happened, it started out just that stupid. Unfortunately, Anonymous' trolling nature simply caused it to snowball.
Plus, what are you implying? Are saying you don't care about the history of the basement dwelling neck-beards? What is this madness?!
I assumed all that happened was a bit of a split though, something about half leaving for 7chan. Never remembered anything about hacking each other's servers.
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH(dun dun-uh)cursedseishi said:I guess you can say Anonymous...
*slips on shades*
doesn't know who it is anymore...
I know I would have picked a cooler name than Ryan if I was on that site like Hermit or Loki or anything that can be associated with an actual name.AnythingOutstanding said:Anonymous member NAMED Ryan?
He ain't anonymous.
On the point of why we protest against them, a bit of both really at least for me - Scientology is a cult that scams people out of vast amounts of money, and should be protested against, and also the people who go to the protest are cool guys and fun to hang out with.ReiverCorrupter said:It seems to me that 'Ryan' is the one who is power hungry. If this was a general movement within Anonymous, then we wouldn't be hearing one guy's name. Why are Anonymous anti-Scientologist again? For the lulz, or because they're money hungry wierdos who take advantage of stupid people? Idk. If you're committed to keeping stupid people from making stupid decisions prepare for an endless battle that you can't win. I say focus on New Zealand.Simalacrum said:Yeah, they've been talking about this on separate Anonymous-associated forums like whyweprotest.net for a few days now... I even saw someone posting "Ryan"'s address and what his house looks like on the forums. General reaction looks to be very much negative against "Ryan", at least within the WWP community (WWP being the main body of the anti-Scientologist aspect of Anonymous).