cball11 said:
"Retarded drunken gunman murders son"
"Drunken man shoots son in neck"
"After 3-Hour Stand-Off, Alleged Murderer of Own Son Arrested"
All good headlines. But wait! A video game was within driving distance of the man at some point in the last week!
Perhaps they mentioned it happened over a video game to draw attention to the fair fact of how (sensationally) petty the reason for the murder of his own son was, which none of those headlines would immediately call out on. Had it happended over a lost cup of coffee or pack of cards, that probably would have been in the headline as well (I don't neccesarily agree with the OP on the the TV-remote thing - I think that would/should have made the headlines as well). Perhaps they should have included "drunken" in the headline too though.
That's not to say that the media (or this media in particular) isn't biased against video games, many media outlets are contributing to an unfounded moral panic (though I've seen none of it here so far), but like the laughable initial opposition to Jazz or Rock & Roll as dangerous new kinds of music, it will die out as more and more people become familiar with them, and discover that they aren't any more dangerous than anything out of Hollywood, and can be great fun.