But you would have to agree that if he put up his fist and hit his son once he may have come to his senses and would have stopped, and the boy would still be alive. When you have a gun all it takes is one little squeeze of the trigger and it's over and done.Bob the Average said:Hold on you mention 'rampant gun culture' as a potential cause, while it is tragic that someone died the gun is not at fault. I can assure you the gun did not Posses him and make him shoot his son. if he didn't have a gun he would have probably got a knife from the kitchen or just put up his fists.
It's a lot harder to go through with killing someone with your bare hands than to shot a little piece of metal at them. I don't believe he would have gone through with actually killing the boy if it weren't for the gun. Maybe he would have, we'll never know now, though.