Duke Nukem Forever Review

themerrygambit

New member
Mar 1, 2010
73
0
0
I hate to agree but yeah there is a lot of "poor taste" stuff in this game. Having played all the way to the strip club scene the generally retarded I.Q. of all the NPCs in the game are beginning to grate on me... if they had just spent a LITTLE time on writing decent dialoge that would have increased the value of the game play tremendously.

*Spoilers ahead... not that it matters really*
Also I hate the fact that I have to shoot girls in order to "save them" that really sucks. I mean I could understand a couple instances to prove the urgency of the situation. I know what they are trying to go for... the whole underground bit hearkens back to the "Aliens" movie. But I would have liked to have been able to save at least some of the girls... it would make me feel slightly better about blowing the others to pieces with my shotgun.

That was probably the part that got me the most. Also I agree with the whole "Ego bar" and 2 weapon thing really taking away from the game. Duke could have at least had the nostalgia game play with health packs and life like what we had in the 90s... there was something about that type of gameplay that seemed more visceral and fast paced. Also the 2 weapons thing sucks. I want my 7 weapons of destruction dammit! If you're going to kill the realism don't go with a lame "ego bar" give me the ability to cart around a ridiculous arsenal of guns!

While the shooting is pretty decent there is something "off" about it that I can't quite lay my fingers on. Probably the 2 gun thing but I can't be sure.

Other than that its pretty cool. some of the minigames are very interesting. Playing pool to boost my ego was one of the most frustrating things ever but it was rewarding when I finally did it (although I wish it had been a little more of a sizable increase)

I like the many references to movies too. Most of the people that play the game won't get them but pretty much everything Duke says is a reference to something. "Groovy" and "good... bad... I'm the guy with the gun" are some pretty funny references to "Army of Darkness" there is also a reference to Predator and a variety of other 80s and 90s movies in there as well as a few modern references too. Did anyone catch the spinning top from "inception"?

Anyway I'm about halfway through, while I don't know that this game will really have much replay value I'm enjoying overall. It's a mediocre to disappointing game to most but for those who played the first game it's falls in the "decent" category for it's few fun moments. You just gotta deal with a whole lot of really bad cheesy lines that fall flat most of the time... and if I hear one more Muther F@#$ker say "wow duke, you're so badass I wish I could be as cool as you" I'm going to vomit... so basically I got a lot of vomitting left to do... but in between bouts of regurgitation I'm expecting to have some fun here and there. ;)
 

themerrygambit

New member
Mar 1, 2010
73
0
0
I agree it's kind of annoying. There are some bad taste portions of the game and there are certainly things to gripe about but there's also a lot of fun little gems in there.
 

themerrygambit

New member
Mar 1, 2010
73
0
0
It's actually not that bad... The biggest annoyance for me is the ridiculously cheesy dialog that falls flat 60-70 percent of the time... but there are a few gems in there. Plus there is a lot of creative gameplay put in the game here and there which is classic duke.

The one Poor taste thing that I didn't like was the level that made me shoot naked girls... they were trying to capture the feeling of the movie "Aliens" but it just made me feel like a baby killer instead. I wish I could have at least saved some of the girls at least... it would have made me feel a little better about the times I was forced to take them out.

But so far the rest of the game is a decent balance between interesting interaction with environmental things. shooting, puzzle solving and platforming... just like the classic game.

Wait for the price to come down a little, buy it, play it, return it to gamestop for a little money back and move on to the next game.
 

squeekenator

New member
Dec 23, 2008
228
0
0
samaugsch said:
No he hasn't. The "review" he gave the game made it sound so good that by itself could've made plenty of people doubt whether it actually came out or not.
Must I put some sort of smiley at the end of every joke or light-hearted comment I make? The internet irritates me at times.
 

Nimzabaat

New member
Feb 1, 2010
886
0
0
Russ Pitts doesn't exactly have any credibility though. I mean DNF isn't a great game, but it isn't a bad game either. I gave up on trusting the opinions of professional children (read game critics) a long time ago. After all, they are trying to make people believe the game was in continuous development for 13 years... Now that's (to quote Yahtzee) "pants-on-head retarded" :)
 

Yosarian2

New member
Jan 29, 2011
39
0
0
What I don't like is the way everyone says this is the worst game ever and then gives it 2 stars, or 4 out of 10, or something. Have some guts. If the game is as bad as you say it is (and it probably is, from everything I'm hearing) then give it a 1 star. I don't know why game reviewers are always afraid to give a bad game the bad rating it deserves.
 

Desert Tiger

New member
Apr 25, 2009
846
0
0
Ioan Constantin said:
It is like having someone on life support for 12 years, and one day, he just gets up and walks, and makes a good game, too. You know, just for the shizz and giggles...
It's like having someone on life support for 12 years and them waking up with brain damage.
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
Nimzabaat said:
Russ Pitts doesn't exactly have any credibility though. I mean DNF isn't a great game, but it isn't a bad game either. I gave up on trusting the opinions of professional children (read game critics) a long time ago. After all, they are trying to make people believe the game was in continuous development for 13 years... Now that's (to quote Yahtzee) "pants-on-head retarded" :)
Why doesn't Russ Pitts have credibility, but you have no problem quoting Yahtzee. Do you think Yahtzee has more credibility than Russ Pitts? Not flaming, just curious.
 

Zulnam

New member
Feb 22, 2010
481
0
0
He didn't exactly quote a game critique Yahtzee made, he just quoted a line he made (more or less) famous.

I found this review pretty weak, then again I never really found any review done by Russ Pits that good (or interesting).
 

Yosarian2

New member
Jan 29, 2011
39
0
0
I do have to say that the amount of angry fanboy ranting about this game on every single site that's done a review on it is pretty funny. People are trying to make it seem like "everyone hates this game because they're offended by it", while ignoring the fact that every single review has, as a central point, "it's just not a very good liner shooter with a lot of poor extras and ugly platforming wedged in."
 

FFHAuthor

New member
Aug 1, 2010
687
0
0
Wow...a review that actually affected my decision to buy a game or not. Before this, I was actually willing to look at it and probably get the game just because of nostalgia and curiosity. Hell, I was even slightly intrigued at the prospect of a certain degree of mindless silliness and juvenile humor, it hadn't crossed the line in my mind from 'simple fun' to 'inanely stupid' But nope, not now...won't buy it, period. When you play a game where you can pick up crap from a toilet and chuck it at a wall, no.

Just no.
 

EmpressZombiKitty

New member
Mar 27, 2011
118
0
0
Well, I can't lie, I've enjoyed the game a whole lot. Each time I see a old monster revamped and all the interactivity, I end up forgiving the flaws. It's not an excuse for them and it's truly a game for the fans. I just sat back and enjoyed.
 

Hashbrick

New member
Mar 20, 2009
135
0
0
I already take escapist reviews with grain of salt but when it comes to Russ reviews its a dump truck full of salt. I don't know what people expected out of DNF but I know what I expected. I didn't expect it to be some awesome modern adaptation of Duke Nukem. I expected it to be back to roots comedy, god damn fun and enjoyable to play and you know what I was right. If you are a fan of the duke nukem franchise this was a tribute game and in my honest opinion was an awesome game. It brought me back to the old days, the old gameplay, the thinking gameplay. Not the press x to open bullshit, no you had puzzles, challenges to clear just like god ol times.

Get your head out of your ass Russ, there is many new games that come out that are far far worse than DNF. The game was long for a duke nukem title, it brought the memories and the fun back. To rate it so low is not only a disgrace to the fans but to the thousands of people that worked on the title throughout the long years it took to finally make it exist.

Those who are still on the fence, if your a duke nukem fan you are going to love this game. It was definatly worth my $50 and hats of to the Gearbox team for an awesome tribute.
 

Levethian

New member
Nov 22, 2009
509
0
0
Industry-wide agenda to distance itself from games like DNF to pursue the status of 'games as art'?

This review reads like a Mary Whitehouse rant, but Jim Sterling's is worse.
 

Mariahsyn

New member
Nov 30, 2010
29
0
0
This game actually offends me. (I didn't think it possible, but there it is!)

It really looks like it was developed by a buncha 12-15 year olds! I expect this from someone's nerdy kid brother who eats paste, not from a company which actually expects to make money.
 

getarealhaircut

New member
May 27, 2011
9
0
0
spot on the money, a bit of machoism is all well and good it just needs to have a better game to hang on .... which is exactly what I would say about the Duke Nukem univers
 

punipunipyo

New member
Jan 20, 2011
486
0
0
This is to the reviewers... please tell me... compare to Duke 3D, is this one better? compare to the old game? why/why not? (assume that it came out in 2004... what would be the review like?) just want to know... because this IS a cryo game after all...
 

Echo136

New member
Feb 22, 2010
1,004
0
0
Paradoxrifts said:
I would have much preferred that the reviewer included something useful in his video supplement like examples of why, how and when the gameplay sucks, rather than the montage of all the toilet humour the reviewer found objectionable.

Seriously, I do not care how lazy, stupid and phoned-in the game being reviewed is, I don't think it is too much to ask for you to do the job that you presumably get paid to do. Showing an example of how the boss fights break down into an joyless mess would have been worth double, no triple the amount of examples of this game's humour.
He DID do the job he was paid to do. It just involves reading
 

fatguy925

New member
May 27, 2009
16
0
0
u no what sfunny, diablo 3 took 12 years to develope and i expect more from it then DNF xD soo i wonder what happened..