Also a lot of people here hate JRPGs and FF7 in particular, so you must be projecting pretty hardProtonGuy said:Ah yes elitistmagazing.com where if a game doesn't have multiplayer filled with screaming, profane 12 year olds, or isn't an artsy downloadable title it's completely written off as shoddy and terrible. Oh I almost for got that if a game isn't somehow related to Final Fantasy VII everyone here will also hate it. But what do I know, I mean I've only been gaming since the Intellivision. Sometimes it's just fun to put in a game and blow up aliens and save the world, but I guess that's to gouache for a generation that wears plaid shits with skinny jeans while sipping their Lattes.
And I READ the review. That doesn't change the fact that he should be showing me where the game went wrong rather than telling me how it went wrong. Using the video supplement to rail against the game's toilet humour is a great deal less important than showing me why I should take his recommendation and not buy the game.Echo136 said:He DID do the job he was paid to do. It just involves readingParadoxrifts said:I would have much preferred that the reviewer included something useful in his video supplement like examples of why, how and when the gameplay sucks, rather than the montage of all the toilet humour the reviewer found objectionable.
Seriously, I do not care how lazy, stupid and phoned-in the game being reviewed is, I don't think it is too much to ask for you to do the job that you presumably get paid to do. Showing an example of how the boss fights break down into an joyless mess would have been worth double, no triple the amount of examples of this game's humour.
I think one stars are reserved for games that don't actually functionWoodsey said:"Recommendation: If you are stuck on a deserted island with only this game to play, go fishing instead. Worth playing so that you may be able to say that you did, but otherwise imminently forgettable and not worth your time."
I'm not one to beef about scores too much, but what would a game have to do get a 1-star rating, I mean Jesus Christ xD
Not really, Valve takes so much time carefully working out every detail, these guys... Well, it passed through too many hands.Abedecain said:I must admit, they shot themselves in the foot with the epic development time, the reviews were always going to be dreadful unless the sun shined when you opened the box.
Unfortunately the same thing may happen with Half Life 3/EP3...
Wow. I've rarely seen a post that's so completely wrong, assuming you're talking about the reviews, and not comments from the community (though I still think you're pretty off even if that is what you're referring to).ProtonGuy said:Ah yes elitistmagazing.com where if a game doesn't have multiplayer filled with screaming, profane 12 year olds, or isn't an artsy downloadable title it's completely written off as shoddy and terrible. Oh I almost for got that if a game isn't somehow related to Final Fantasy VII everyone here will also hate it. But what do I know, I mean I've only been gaming since the Intellivision. Sometimes it's just fun to put in a game and blow up aliens and save the world, but I guess that's to gouache for a generation that wears plaid shits with skinny jeans while sipping their Lattes.