EA Announces New Medal of Honor

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
GamingAwesome1 said:
Greaaat..... another boring as fuck brown WW2 game that we are desperately trying to get rid of.
Greaaat...another idiot not bothering to read the article before ocmmenting.

Depending on how succesful Bad Company 2 is(Which, in my opinion, deserves to sell more than Modern Warfare 2 due to the fact that the developers haven't been making fun of the PC community) this game will be overshadowed. Bad Company 2 will probably be the big boy when it comes to multiplayer and if this new Medal of Honor doesn't add something interesting to the multiplayer aspect it will probably, has I said before, be overshadowed by BC2.

Then again, there's the Single Player aspect to think of. Still, most people tend to buy FPS's for the multiplayer aspect.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Furburt said:
Also, why would a WW1 FPS be boring, exactly? It's not as though nothing happened in that war.
It's because you can't call any side "Axis of Evil".
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Furburt said:
oliveira8 said:
Furburt said:
Also, why would a WW1 FPS be boring, exactly? It's not as though nothing happened in that war.
It's because you can't call any side "Axis of Evil".
Why is that required?
So the Amaricana feel like they killing evil people and save the world from a nasty Emperor.
 

Danny Ocean

Master Archivist
Jun 28, 2008
4,148
0
0
Why does everyone seem to forget about this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_2], arguably one of the greatest games ever, with one of the most refined squad play experiences, when they discuss war games set in the modern era?


CoD4 wasn't the first, you know.​
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Furburt said:
oliveira8 said:
Furburt said:
oliveira8 said:
Furburt said:
Also, why would a WW1 FPS be boring, exactly? It's not as though nothing happened in that war.
It's because you can't call any side "Axis of Evil".
Why is that required?
So the Amaricana feel like they killing evil people and save the world from a nasty Emperor.
Evil Emperor right here
He wasn't evil. Good moustache but no evilness.
 

Danny Ocean

Master Archivist
Jun 28, 2008
4,148
0
0
Furburt said:
Danny Ocean said:
CoD4 wasn't the first, you know.
Heck, Delta Force came out in 1998.
Oh, I remember that game now. They also made a Modern-era game to go with the film Black Hawk Down. I recall it being really rather hard.
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
Furburt said:
Think about it. A former WWII FPS series ditches WW2 in favour of a made up story set in plausible real world conflict areas.

Clone may be a strong word, but since all we know right now is concept, the concept is a clone.
This is not a game concept, this is a company's history. Slightly different. That's like saying Gearbox copied Take Two because they went the way of the dodo.

Activision and Infinity Ward were also hardly the first to start in WWII and see potential in modern conflict [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Battlefield_games] (and the battlefield series did it two years earlier).

Furburt said:
Knowing that MOH has never really been a strong innovator, I assume that everything that follows will most probably be unoriginal.
MOHAA was the Modern Warfare of it's time... so much so the Call of Duty franchise started by bloodily ripping it off, making your entire point that much more nonsensical.

So the company that practically defined the genre as we know it today (along Wolfenstein) has no hopes of making something original, but the company that started off by cloning them is totally cool?

Furburt said:
Also, why would a WW1 FPS be boring, exactly? It's not as though nothing happened in that war.
Because it would come down to:

A) Sit in trenches for days. Die from mustard gas, bombings, malnutrition, etc...
B) Sit in trenches for days. Charge across barren, battle torn fields. Die in under 5 minutes.
c) Sit in trenches for days. Charge across barren, battle torn fields. Kill the enemy in under 5 minutes. Spend 20 minutes looting their shit. Sit in your new trenches for a few more days.

Ah yes, I can feel the excitement now...

(Note: That could actually work as an RTS... Not as an FPS.)
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
Bit of a shame, quite a predictable move. I would've liked it if they would've gone to Vietnam, but maybe a "Hurray go America!" series like Medal of Honor (name says it all) doesn't really fit with the Vietnam war.

Gotta say by the way, the guy on the picture has one helluva rugged beard.
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
I never cared about the MoH series, and I doubt this is going to change my mind.

It's obvious they're just ripping off of CoD.

EDIT: Either you play as a different character ("the enemy's" side, for instance) or I will continue to not care.
 

Kellerb

New member
Jan 20, 2009
882
0
0
bloody hell... i know developers copy ideas and such, but this is just stupid...
 

Disaster Button

Elite Member
Feb 18, 2009
5,237
0
41
SuperMse said:
2005- The Battlefield series is updated from a World War 2 setting to a more modern era. That game is called Battlefield 2: Modern Combat, and has upgradable and customizable classes.

2007- The Call of Duty series is updated from a World War 2 setting to a more modern era. That game is called Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, and has upgradable and customizable classes.

2009- The Medal of Honor series is announced to be receiving an update from a World War 2 setting to a more modern era, with multiplayer developed by the same guys who make the Battlefield series.

Am I the only one noticing a pattern?
Oh my god I see it! All the numbers add up to 23!