Yeah it looks cool doesn't it?JourneyThroughHell said:
And you're right, they'll have to make the controls more fluid (so that you and Colin can laugh hysterically as you skillfully manouvre and humiliate me
EA: "Battlefield 3 is designed to take Call of Duty down."
- Thread starter Saucycarpdog
- Start date
And you're right, they'll have to make the controls more fluid (so that you and Colin can laugh hysterically as you skillfully manouvre and humiliate me
Oh, and the knifing. Please don't do Commando so I can actually shoot people.MiracleOfSound said:Yeah it looks cool doesn't it?
And you're right, they'll have to make the controls more fluid (so that you and Colin can laugh hysterically as you skillfully manouvre and humiliate me
Colin is Blade, I swear.
I. Hate. Him. When. He. Knifes. Me.JourneyThroughHell said:Oh, and the knifing. Please don't do Commando so I can actually shoot people.MiracleOfSound said:Yeah it looks cool doesn't it?
And you're right, they'll have to make the controls more fluid (so that you and Colin can laugh hysterically as you skillfully manouvre and humiliate me
Colin is Blade, I swear.
The annoying, mocking, laugh.... ARGH!
Well, at least you could take revenge on him with enless RC-Cars via Hardline.MiracleOfSound said:
Did I mention Miracle does that? And he has the AUDACITY to complain about Black Ops.
I have to ask what the next Call of Duty game is even going to be about. You'd think that Treyarch and Infinity Ward would've run out of wars to use by now.
I'll also be honest and say that Battlefield has never really grabbed me as good shooter. I'm not saying it's a terrible game at all, but between me and the game I feel like some element of intensity is missing.
I'll also be honest and say that Battlefield has never really grabbed me as good shooter. I'm not saying it's a terrible game at all, but between me and the game I feel like some element of intensity is missing.
There's one problem with this that I can see...
Many people will look at Battlefield 3, possibly even conclude that it is better than CoD based on a variety of things (ads, friends, forums etc) and STILL buy CoD because it's what they've always done.
Although besides the fanbase, I don't actually despise CoD
Many people will look at Battlefield 3, possibly even conclude that it is better than CoD based on a variety of things (ads, friends, forums etc) and STILL buy CoD because it's what they've always done.
Although besides the fanbase, I don't actually despise CoD
By making another modern war game. Neat.
And either way, it isn't going to do shit. Might be a good game, but unless it comes with free orgasms, it doesn't have a chance.
And either way, it isn't going to do shit. Might be a good game, but unless it comes with free orgasms, it doesn't have a chance.
Will EA ever stop attempting to "take down" Call of Duty? Has the industry changed so much? Remember the days when quality was more important than taking down your competition? Seriously guys, focus on making a GOOD GAME. If it IS good then people will buy it. The only reason most "modern" shooters fail so much is because they attempt to copy Call of Duty's formula and cater to Call of Duty fans. What they forget is that Call of Duty fans are just that, CALL OF DUTY fans. Cater to a different audience, this ones taken.
The only thing? What about Origin Studios, Westwood, Maxis, and Bullfrog, amongst many many others? There's a whole wikipedia page listing all the studios that EA has acquired and then shut after killing their IPs by turning lovingly crafted games into sequel-per-year production-line rushjobs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Electronic_Arts. Out of the 4 I just listed, you got a serious contender for greatest ever crpg developer, a serious contender for greatest RTS-developer, and the hands-down two best sim+strategy developers. And in each case it was just a few years and a handful of games before they were killed off and their IPs turned to casual shovelware.HankMan said:
AIEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!! That's just plain crazy.Raiyan 1.0 said:Pffft! You kids with your BFs and CoDs.
Real men play ArmA 2.
<youtube=khG8pVEmzO4>
May have to invest in ARMA2 then...
OT: BF3 won't exactly have to try that hard, considering that Call of Duty has been pretty stale IMO since CoD WaW.
I agree with you in general, but I would like to point out that Battlefield 2 was about Modern warfare - and it came 2 years before Cod4 Modern Warfare.Axolotl said:
EA, you'd better not be fucking copying CoD - Bad Company was sweet, hampered only by my persistent connection difficulties. Stepping up the same would be a win in my book, but if you go and just duplicate the market leader I'm gonna be soooo disappointed :/
Remember MoH? Your last 'CoD Killer'? Yeah, just stop comparing with other games and stand proud with the IP you've got :/
Remember MoH? Your last 'CoD Killer'? Yeah, just stop comparing with other games and stand proud with the IP you've got :/
And how many realistic shooters do we have that are good? Last time I played operation Flashpoint I pulled the game out after the first mission and played CODFloppertje said:
I do hope BF3 dethrone COD, but keep in mind they are two different game... One being a tactical FPS, the other being more like Counter Strike.
Still,I do not like how EA is being such a bully with their marketing... Ah well, they BETTER make BF3 a truly good game, otherwise ... well, it would be embarrassing for EA, and imagine the number of RAGE it will generate should it fail.
Still,I do not like how EA is being such a bully with their marketing... Ah well, they BETTER make BF3 a truly good game, otherwise ... well, it would be embarrassing for EA, and imagine the number of RAGE it will generate should it fail.