i agree sims 2 FTWVault101 said:do we NEED the sims 5?
cause sims 2 seems to be all you need at this point
his sentence is fine. Its a quote from low life gangster threats. Dough is a nickname for money. Its basically a robbery situation of "give me money or i shoot the hostage".CatLafitte said:Bread = the stuff you eat.Racecarlock said:"Gimme the dough or I kill the broad!" - EA
Broad = Girl/woman.
Might want to think about rephrasing that sentence of yours... lol.
Funny, you'd think they would have learned that this wouldn't work after Dead Space 3.TKhanman said:So is this their master plan?
Step 1: Cut corners with the Sims 4 and save some money. (smaller world, no pools and toddlers, bugs, etc.)
Step 2: Threaten fanbase by not developing the next Sims game if Sims 4 is not successful.
Step 3: Make
oads of money.
Step 4: Repeat.
Sounds like that turning over a new leaf thing isn't working so well right now.
No no, the statement itself is reasonable enough. After all if the franchise is no longer profitable, why should they continue it? The problem is they didn't exactly take the steps necessary to ensure that The Sims 4 would be successful and instead banked everything on name recognition.tippy2k2 said:Oh EA, you so silly!
First you say you don't want to be considered the worst company in America again [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/137287-EA-We-Never-Want-to-Be-Named-Worst-U-S-Company-Again-Be-Named-Worst-U-S-Company-Again] and then you state that if your rush-job piece of S game doesn't sell well, you're going to kill the entire franchise.
But yeah EA, threaten your consumer base. That's the key to not being voted the worst company in America...
A very good point, there is a reason I finally switched to the sims 3 once weather was finally added back in (honestly I abandoned the idea of getting the Sims 4 once they tried to pull that stunt again) and that reason is that once you get the content with expansions evened out the Sims 3 at its base did actually add things over the Sims 2 base game. I'll admit I was skeptical of the open neighborhood at first but eventually I grew to like it along with the whole story progression town aspect and I even used the create a style tool far more than I thought I would.MarsAtlas said:While thats true, it was the result of trying something to drastically improve the franchise - which it did. Even if you fix the current bugs in The Sims 4, you've got less than The Sims 2 did at release, with the only exception being character creation. The Sims 4 is a blatant downgrade for the series, an insult to a long-time fan like myself. No Create a Style, no Open World, no ability to create new lots, no ability to alter the world or public lots, alongside the game being 32-bit only. This is easily the weakest iteration since the first Sims game, and the engine prevents the game from being improved. While the Sims 3 had, quite frankly, atrocious loading times, everything was loaded once the game did so, and it was improved further into the game's lifecycle. That hope doesn't exist for many of the core features that are either missing or crippled in TS4.aceman67 said:I like how everyone is forgetting how bug-ridden and bloated (a ram hog, I have a computer with 16gb of ram, and with all the xp and DLC and mods, the game slows down) sims 3 was, and damn, the LOADING TIMES! damn, they were bad.