EA Slings More Mud at Activision

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Holy shit, a story where a guy from Activision has the moral high ground. Some call Satan, is it getting chilly down there?

Cheshire the Cat said:
Anyone else imagining Activision to stick Kotick in a straight jacket and mask like Hannibal Lector to stop him responding? Dudes probably foaming at the mouth by now.
Doubt it, he probably knows as well as we do that this just makes EA look like a bunch of retarded children.
 

Reaper195

New member
Jul 5, 2009
2,055
0
0
Both companies can fuck off. Battlefield 3 and MW3 both look like shooters which will bring nothing new to the FPS genre, which has been dead for quite some time (Around the time MW1 came out, which was really the last FPS with a decent story...and some somewhat interesting characters).
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
The Artificially Prolonged said:
Gentlemen please, settle this like civilised men on the field of honour. Deathmatches on MW3 and BF3, most kills wins.

In truth seeing two very highly paid businessmen talk smack to each other is really pathetic and unprofessional.
Now that is something I would like to see. Would be interesting to see who is better in which game. The most hilarious would be if the guy from EA was better in MW and Activision was better in BF3. I also agree about the part of this being pathetic.
 

Soulreefer

New member
Jun 23, 2010
3
0
0
Bill Hicks had something to say about marketing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDW_Hj2K0wo

I'll just leave this here.
 

FinalFreak16

New member
Mar 23, 2010
98
0
0
I dont particularly like EA or Activision. However I do like DICE and Infinity Ward and wont be abandoning either game based on the crap their publishers are coming out with.
 

Gunner 51

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,218
0
0
Wouldn't it be amusing if DICE and Treyarch/Infinity Ward would team up and publish the games themselves leaving EA and Activision behind to eat their dust. Never mind the marketing, fans can finance the game by donating £45 up front and wait their game of choice to arrive on Live or PSN.

OK, so the gamers have to pay an extra £5 and wait six decades for the game to download via one's console. Publishers take far too much money from the developers and if all of our £40 goes to the developers - surely that's money WELL spent. It's a lot of trouble, but wouldn't it be worth it just to wipe the smug smile off Bobby Kotick's face?
 

Druyn

New member
May 6, 2010
554
0
0
I'm sorry, I'm just disappointed. I don't care who's right, I really just thought the medium was better than this. EA is just being immature on level on par with the stereotypical CoD player. That is not a good thing, and it hardly makes us look good or me want to buy their game.
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
Seriously, i hope neither of these games do well now.
At this rate EA's going ot make you sign your soul away to play BF3, and MW3 is going to be EXACTLY THE SAME AS ALL THE OTHERS.

Fuck you EA.
Fuck you Activision.
 

Alon Shechter

New member
Apr 8, 2010
1,286
0
0
"You completely dominated the shooter market last year and this year you'll dominate it a little less but still more than us!"
Dude, EA's a foul-mouthed little bastard.
 

AlphaEcho

New member
Jun 16, 2010
228
0
0
Mcoffey said:
AlphaEcho said:
Mcoffey said:
Neither game looks particularly interesting, but only one of them requires me to install a bullshit, ancillary DRM client. If I were going to get either it'd be Modern Warfare. Origin can fuck itself.

The trash talk is just a PR stunt. I don't think either CEO really cares all that much about "the medium" and are both really just trying to push numbers in their own way.
If BF3 does not interest you, you have to lower your standards.

Stop being a ***** over origins, you have to install it to play BF3, you do not need to keep it. It only has to be a one time install.
BF3 doesn't interest me because it looks like a shinier version of Modern Warfare 3. The damage physics and weapons or whatever don't really matter to me.

As far as Origin, I've already got steam, which is more than enough. I don't need nor want origin. EA's games aren't so vital that I need to put up their extra shit just to play them.
Did you not read what I just said? It is a one time download that you can uninstall wright after.
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,806
0
0
I love the fight, I like that Hirschberg is taking the high ground while lying out of his ass, and I love that Green in a complete douche, but saying the things we all know Hirschberg is thinking. So yeah, this is gonna be entertaining :D
Btw, I would be so happy if both these games fail. Seriously, I'd jump and scream. If MW3 fails, I'd still be very happy, and if BF3 fails I'll barely react cuz it's not really surprising. Until I see the piracy figures for BF3, then I'll laugh again...
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Over compensating much EA?

I dunno about all you but the latest Battlefield info impressed me a lot more than the latest Call of Duty info.
 

cynicalsaint1

Salvation a la Mode
Apr 1, 2010
545
0
21
I'm going to have to side with EA here.

Activision's rhetoric comes off as empty platitudes - seeing as their love affair with fatiguing their franchises with annual releases probably does as much damage to the games industry as anything else, while EA smack talking is actually kind of amusing.
 

iamultraman

New member
Nov 27, 2010
44
0
0
An emotional side of me said, "Yeah, this is pretty stupid," but another, rational side of me said, "No, that's business." This is how business works: fierce, brutal competition. If the industry took the method Activision's spokesperson said, we wouldn't have the major technological advancements, much less improvement on the industrial complex of games, necessary to get into a higher state of entertainment. Even if you take the artsy perspective in this situation, this advancement definitely affects indie developers. When the whole industry goes up, the whole industry goes up absolutely. This may seem childish, but escalation is terrific because the only way to deflate tensions is to smoke out the competition, either by intimidation (upping the quality of services) or just going all out on physical altercations. Latter ain't happenin'.

Also, I want to see Activision fucking dirty after this. Nobody else wants to see that? They've had a pretty comfortable position for a while. If EA's new tactic really gets to them, they'll try to change up their development strategy, for better and for worse. News right there.

Edit: I don't know how accurate this is but maybe if, after this escalation, Activision loses the competition it'll lose the faith of its stockholders/investors or something? I know nothing about economics, a-doh.
 

Traun

New member
Jan 31, 2009
659
0
0
Beryl77 said:
While EA isn't exactly acting like mature adults, I don't believe one word out of Hirshbergs mouth. He's just saying those good things to make Activision look better but I'm pretty sure he doesn't believe the words he says.
Neither does Green. These people are not the type that will be that emotional over a video game rivalry. Their prime concerns are investors and profits.

What you see is EA's PR department at work.