Haha, Gabe has a new name, and it is very fitting.Cognimancer said:EA: "There Is No Feud With Valve"
Valve boss Game Newell has
Haha, Gabe has a new name, and it is very fitting.Cognimancer said:EA: "There Is No Feud With Valve"
Valve boss Game Newell has
Spokesman quote trimmed down for relevant partsThey take a piece of the revenue stream.
1.The group of students themselfs showed Valve their project , Valve havent bought them out.Sober Thal said:It's obvious that if Valve see's a group of programers making something great (like portal) they will just eat them up, then try to sell it in a way to make more profit for the company. Valve is a business who's goal is to make money. Big shocker. Shove thoes fucking hats up your ***!!
I wish.Coffinshaker said:no feud? so that means steam will get mass effect 3 then pretty soon right? ...right?
I agree with you. EA is far from being the pit of evilness that people make it out to be -- and it is even farther from being America's worst company.Sober Thal said:I'm sorry, but when the link that is supposed to show "Valve doesn't hate Origin" is written by a guy who claims Gabe is a "leading man at Valve" takes place, I kinda just have to roll my eyes at the whole thing. Valve has no center/direction aka management... So why do we care what one dude says??? Am I the only one who read the report of Valves vacant management system??
It's obvious that if Valve see's a group of programers making something great (like portal) they will just eat them up, then try to sell it in a way to make more profit for the company. Valve is a business who's goal is to make money. Big shocker. Shove thoes fucking hats up your ***!!
It seems juvenile to me, that people make such harsh assumptions of EA, when at the end of the day, they just want to make great games too. But I realize the hipster mentality infests the masses of forum posters, so I humbly request you don't quote my post and call me a troll, wish me imprisonment, or in any way try to make me feel small. Cuz that's what I have had to deal with for quite some time now....
Bottom line: You want to take sides, cuz you think things are simple black and white issues. I don't think they are. EA doesn't want shit games. Don't you get that?!?!?!? Nah, you probably don't.
So true, I once bought a DLC for a EA/Bioware title and never bought any more.Irridium said:Basically Steam terms were updated to say that any DLC must be on Steam in addition to anywhere else. EA wants their DLC to be on their own sites, and nowhere else.
And so... disagreement.
I kind of wish EA would put their DLC on Steam. It's a hell of a lot better than jumping through multiple sites to buy goddamn bioware points to buy goddamn DLC off their goddamn site. They could still have their shitty-ass site purchases, they would just need to put their DLC on Steam as well. But they won't, because then everyone would buy off Steam because doing that is a hell of a lot easier than going to the damn Bioware social site to find the damn DLC to get re-directed to the game's damn website to buy goddamn Bioware points to finally buy the freaking DLC.
Sorry, got a bit carried away there...
EDIT: Do you know what you have to do to download Bring Down the Sky for Mass Effect on the PC? Well to download this free DLC, you have to search for the thing, which will take a while to find. Put in your game's activation code, download it, find out you can't open it because it sends the code to a profile on a site that doesn't exist anymore, contact EA support, and have them email you a replacement code to use.
All this. To download a free DLC. You'd think they would fix this now that they have their own service, you know, put it on Origin for easy downloading. In fact, you'd think they do this with the ME2 and all the Dragon Age DLC. You know, make it easy to find and buy. But NOPE. Because... I don't even fucking know why. It has been like this for goddamn years.
With Steam, you just have to find it and buy it. It'll download and install in its own.
And they're supposed to compete with Steam. Hilarious.
Sorry, got carried away. Again. It's just... they could do their DLC so much better and make buying/installing it so much easier. They are capable of doing so much better.. But they don't and aren't. And I don't know why. And that confuses and infuriates me.
Sorry, got a bit carried away. Again.
They don't insist. They offer it to developers FOR FREE -Draech said:Is that any different for any other game that doesn't use Steam?
You really think that Notch isn't putting Minecraft on steam solely for ideological reasons? He didn't have a problem working with Microsoft when it meant opening up more market.
How is it different from Valve insisting that their games were sold with Steam?
Well played, my good sir. Well played.Amgeo said:An ant has no quarrel with a boot.
Yeah, I misunderstood. The "they" in "their" referred to Valve, not those who wish to distribute through Steam.Draech said:I am sorry you seem to have missunderstod what I said.
Valve doesn't insist that their own games go through their distribution?
I think you will find that they do.
This is no different than EA insisting on Origin for their games.
Why do people keep using this as some sort of debate?I always wondered why EA published L4D and Portal 2 on consoles if they supposedly despise Valve, I mean, why help your rival?