From the blog.Aiddon said:and Nintendo just doesn't STOP with the announcements:
http://www.gonintendo.com/s/230649-codename-s-t-e-a-m-roundtable-live-blog
Seriously, they have so many games you almost forget these are almost all made by ONE company. While everyone else iss truggling to garner an identity is a sea of blandness, Nintendo does stuff like this and proves how versatile they are.
I loved how they solved the Bayonetta problem. Two for 1 PLUS Bayonetta gets a bunch of new Nintendo themed outfits. Seriously Bayonetta dressed up as Link? Sign me up. My friend showed me the sales data for the week of Mario Kart 8 release. It sold over 100,000 units that week compared to say the Xbone which barely managed 50,000 coming in even behind the 3DS which at this point is becoming a dinosaur age wise in technology terms.Brian Tams said:*nods sadly*Jumwa said:Games are fun.
Gamers are depressing. As evidenced here.
OT: I was really encouraged by the whole thing. A ton of games are coming to the Wii U (I am now very happy I decided to support the system when it looked like it was about to go on life support) that I'm interested. In fact, Nintendo is setting up for a pretty good turn around. Mario Kart 8 already gave the console a well needed steroid shot in the arm, plus we have Bayonetta (+1), Smash Bros. 4, and Zelda Warriors coming later in the year, plus a whole slew of games on the horizon in 2015... Its going to be interesting to see how it affects console sales.
Yes, Nintendo does what it wants - does the same thing every year. and peopel still call it new.Unlike Microsoft and Sony, who follow similar patterns year after year, Nintendo does whatever it wants.
well, then you should look at SONY, who announced the most new games at this E3.weirdee said:y'know what
i know how sony and microsoft court investors, and i guess that's how they stay afloat, but
maybe i want to play, some freaking games???
instead of increasing shareholder value
Dark Knifer said:I don't understand the hype for hyrule warriors though. Almost every japanese franchise has a dynasty warriors knock off at some point, why is it when nintendo does it it's a big deal?
I'm genuinely confused by this post. For one they already came out with Mario Kart earlier this month and said nothing about another one this E3. Also I'm unsure what the gimmicks are. Online multiplayer and brand new IPs? I mean don't get me wrong they did show off how some of the game use the Wii U Gamepad, but that's less "gimmick" and more "we're finding ways to implement the hardware".Silentpony said:All serious, a new Zelda, a new Mario kart and more gimmicks than you can shake a Wii-mote at and you call it refreshing? As in reassuringly fresh, meaning new or clean?
Nintendo couldn't be a dirtier, smellier, fouler, rotting corpse if it tried, which is refreshing because they obviously aren't!
Strazdas said:refreshingly fun....
another zelda remake - check
level editor that even calculators 15 years ago had and PCs had BETTER one for a decade - check
another super smash bros - check
nothing but sequels - check
so, nothing refreshing or fun after all
Yes, Nintendo does what it wants - does the same thing every year. and peopel still call it new.Unlike Microsoft and Sony, who follow similar patterns year after year, Nintendo does whatever it wants.
well, then you should look at SONY, who announced the most new games at this E3.weirdee said:y'know what
i know how sony and microsoft court investors, and i guess that's how they stay afloat, but
maybe i want to play, some freaking games???
instead of increasing shareholder value
You mean like Other M?PeaceRider said:Dark Knifer said:I don't understand the hype for hyrule warriors though. Almost every japanese franchise has a dynasty warriors knock off at some point, why is it when nintendo does it it's a big deal?
It's a big deal because ever sense the debacle with the Philips CD-I and the Super Mario Bros. live action movie, Nintendo has held it's titles close to itself hand has rarely let outside groups play around with their big names. Seeing Nintendo let a trusted group like the team behind the still popular Dynasty/Samurai Warriors titles make a spin off based on one of the most popular and beloved franchises is a good sign that Nintendo might ease up and let outside teams take a crack at making games with the Big N's main characters.
That would be SONY. not that im defending them or anything. its simple factual that they amounced the most games.PeaceRider said:It's all perspective. You look at who announced the most new games and how many of those games are "new"
"Another Zelda Remake" - which was....what? I saw no remake. I saw in-game footage of a new crossover-ish title in Hyrule Warriors and Cinematic footage from next years Zelda U title which Aonuma says will be more expansive and you can travel in any direction and reach the mountains seen in the distance (kinda like what Xenoblade did).
"Level editor" - you mean Mario Maker? So what if things years ago could do something similar? This is the first Mario Paint like title in ages, and some people (young and old) actually like that.
"Nothing but sequels" - Bayonetta 2, Kirby and the Rainbow Curse, and I guess Mario Party 10 and Smash count as well. That's only 4 sequels out of the around 10 titles they talked about. So what? Franchises are built on "Sequels". You want to complain about the countless Call of Duty and Battlefield games released every year, too? What about the yearly sports games which are pretty much just patches, upgrades, and roster changes.
"Nothing refreshing at all" what about a full day of showing actual game play for almost all titles brought up instead of standing on a stage all day talking while showing pretty cinematics and next to no gameplay. Nintendo even held a tournament for a game that technically isn't even done yet and it went off without a hitch or glitch.
Strazdas said:What exactly is Hyrule Warriors a "remake" of???PeaceRider said:That would be SONY. not that im defending them or anything. its simple factual that they amounced the most games.
Yes, hyracule warriors is the zelda remake. oh and yeah they also have a sequel. like the billion zelda games wasnt enough.
Mario maker is mistitled. you can only make individual levels in it. a superior program, that allws you to actually make mario games using assets of all mario titles is FREE, released a decade ago. so they are essentialy releasing a inferior program, 10 years too late and asking money for it. not something im going to praise even if some people like it.
Baynetta 2 isnt a sequel? it even has 2 in the name for Jims sake!
and kirby os your new IP?
Or Mario party 10.
Oh, and yes i do complain about countless COD and BF games too. And Yearly 60 dollar sport game DLCs are even worse than that.
you got a point with gameplay i admit.
What is this program you speak of? Was it officially licensed by Nintendo? Probably not.
When did I not say Bayonetta 2 was not a sequel?? I was listing off the "sequels" that you could of possibly of been talking about, which there aren't as many as you first made it out to seem.
When did I count a Kirby game as new IP?
hyracule warriors actually looks pretty fun!PeaceRider said:Yes, hyracule warriors is the zelda remake. oh and yeah they also have a sequel. like the billion zelda games wasnt enough.
but they have got a new ip!!!and kirby os your new IP?
Or Mario party 10.
This post couldn't be any more cynical if it tried.Silentpony said:Oh OH! I see what happened. Yeah, no, see you got 'refreshingly fun' mixed up with 'dull, predictable and boring. Again.'
Same thing happened to me once when I had a cold. Told everyone it was refreshingly fun.
All serious, a new Zelda, a new Mario kart and more gimmicks than you can shake a Wii-mote at and you call it refreshing? As in reassuringly fresh, meaning new or clean?
Nintendo couldn't be a dirtier, smellier, fouler, rotting corpse if it tried, which is refreshing because they obviously aren't!
Still managing more genre variety (and color spectrum) than other press conferences though. That's the important part.softclocks said:Nintendo's not predictable?
They're publishing the same old games in bright colours.
Speaking of Other M, Team Ninja IS part of the team working on Hyrule Warriors, but I think they are more relegated to designs and models then actual character stuff, so we can hope the ladies of the game won't suffer the same fate as Other M Samus. XDDark Knifer said:You mean like Other M?PeaceRider said:Dark Knifer said:I don't understand the hype for hyrule warriors though. Almost every japanese franchise has a dynasty warriors knock off at some point, why is it when nintendo does it it's a big deal?
It's a big deal because ever sense the debacle with the Philips CD-I and the Super Mario Bros. live action movie, Nintendo has held it's titles close to itself hand has rarely let outside groups play around with their big names. Seeing Nintendo let a trusted group like the team behind the still popular Dynasty/Samurai Warriors titles make a spin off based on one of the most popular and beloved franchises is a good sign that Nintendo might ease up and let outside teams take a crack at making games with the Big N's main characters.
Well you have a point in that its a very safe gamble in comparison to that so that would be kind of nice.
I'm probably not interested in the game itself since dynasty warriors bores me but maybe its a sign nintendo will be more interesting in the future.