Elder Scrolls Online's First Microtransaction Is a Horse

Recommended Videos

Starke

New member
Mar 6, 2008
3,876
0
0
Halyah said:
I'm starting to get The Secret World vibes from this game now...
I'm not... yet. Secret World actually pulled the most popular clothes in the beta, and moved them into the cash shop. We'll see in two weeks, but I don't see that happening here.
 

Clive Howlitzer

New member
Jan 27, 2011
2,781
0
0
Flutterguy said:
Queue the gamer misanthropy!
Honestly, I can't think of the last multiplayer game I played that didn't have pay shop of some kind.

WoW, Tera, Neverwinter, Borderlands 2 etc etc.. It is a common theme of games these days.
It doesn't make it right. Especially when they are charging you 14.99 a month just to have access to their game.
 

Zac Jovanovic

New member
Jan 5, 2012
253
0
0
This is becoming much like anti EA blind hate. Getting crucified and singled out for things everyone else does too, and started doing it way before them.

Also way to write a non biased article.
 

Flutterguy

New member
Jun 26, 2011
970
0
0
Clive Howlitzer said:
Flutterguy said:
Queue the gamer misanthropy!
Honestly, I can't think of the last multiplayer game I played that didn't have pay shop of some kind.

WoW, Tera, Neverwinter, Borderlands 2 etc etc.. It is a common theme of games these days.
It doesn't make it right. Especially when they are charging you 14.99 a month just to have access to their game.
You really wanna see gouging? Look at the Blizzard store right now. You can BUY MAX LEVEL for WoW. Not to mention its a decade old game which has held it's 14.99$ a month model since its inception. I have yet to see thread complaining about that though. Oh right thats because the majority of threads are just people parroting the popular opinion, which right now is just how dissa-fucking-pointed they are with ESO.
 

Karadalis

New member
Apr 26, 2011
1,065
0
0
Flutterguy said:
Clive Howlitzer said:
Flutterguy said:
Queue the gamer misanthropy!
Honestly, I can't think of the last multiplayer game I played that didn't have pay shop of some kind.

WoW, Tera, Neverwinter, Borderlands 2 etc etc.. It is a common theme of games these days.
It doesn't make it right. Especially when they are charging you 14.99 a month just to have access to their game.
You really wanna see gouging? Look at the Blizzard store right now. You can BUY MAX LEVEL for WoW. Not to mention its a decade old game which has held it's 14.99$ a month model since its inception. I have yet to see thread complaining about that though. Oh right thats because the majority of threads are just people parroting the popular opinion, which right now is just how dissa-fucking-pointed they are with ESO.
How about the 7 million players worldwide who think its a fun game?

The cash shop is also non intrusive, youre not given a quest to "fake purchase" an item from the money shop in a tutorial and what they sell is completly cosmetic and gives you absolutely 0 advantage over other players.

Unless riding a "faboulus" mount is somehow an advantage.

And to top it all off they introduced the cash shop YEARS after their initial run.

Oh and the pay for max level thing? Has existed for years too.. only before blizzard offered it you had illegal "leveling" services that if you where stupid enough to use them would likely end up with a stolen account. So blizzard is simply taking away the market from those shady "businesmen" in china.

Also the max level thing really is not a big deal after more then a decade and 90 character levels. People are just sick and tired of leveling up their twinks through the same old content they had for years now.

What i do agree about thought is that their subscription model needs its pricing cut... the game is so old it simply doesnt feel right anymore to still demand 14 euros a month.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
Nazulu said:
iblis666 said:
so you can buy a horse in game .... nothing to see here its just a bunch of qq about people getting things without major impact early. I remember old time wow players complaining about noobs getting mounts early as well and its all stupid.
what is qq? I have a strong feeling it's a new way to antagonize people.
QQ is actually pretty oldschool. While many people now believe the Qs represent crying eyes Alt+qq was the keyboard combination to quit out of warcraft2. So telling someone to QQ was basically calling him a noob.
 

Bindal

New member
May 14, 2012
1,320
0
0
Let me get this straight. This game has
1. A one-time purchase requirement of the disc of 60$
2. A subscription required to play
3. Microtransactions

So, they use ALL three payment methods of an MMO at once while every other sets for one of them (maybe two if one is purely cosmetic Microtransactions)?
This has "going to bomb" written all over it. WHO WOULD BUY THIS?
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,697
0
0
Karadalis said:
Sorry but you cannot compare a game that almost ran over a decade with an upstart by the numbers mmo that wants to tripple dip your wallet before it goes f2p.
I absolutely can. As stated already, that is if you bothered to read my post at all, this mount s barely faster than sprinting speed, and that's if you are sprinting while riding the thing. I played the last beta, I rode the mount. It's not as impressive as you give it credit for. At normal speed you might as well dismount and run to the nearest battle. What advantage in PvP is there besides giving your opponent the ability to see you coming from a mile away, giving them ample time to set up defenses? It's there to look good, and again, I seriously doubt that Zenimax is going to charge anywhere close to the insane prices Activision charges for their mounts. It's a go-between for players not buying the deluxe edition.
 

Guitarmasterx7

Day Pig
Mar 16, 2009
3,871
0
0
So you have to buy the game, then you have to pay a monthly subscription, and on top of that they have the nerve to include microtransactions? Yeah, any chance of me actually getting this is gone.
 

Kuredan

Hingle McCringleberry
Dec 4, 2012
166
0
0
I don't know if any of you Beta-players tried the Cyrodil PVP campaign, but you NEED a horse. Preferably one with Nitro Boosters. The map is huge and fast travel is limited to when you die and when your faction has connected outposts. The time I spent slogging from my factions closest outpost to the front lines of the battlefield was tortuous. Every death was disheartening because I knew I had a eight minute ride to get back. Yes, you can set up forward camps, but those are expensive and have a limited duration. So yeah, horses are awesome. I had enough money by the end of this beta to get one and while it did make travel faster, it was still too long on the Cyrodil Map.
 

Mister Chippy

New member
Jun 12, 2013
100
0
0
Remus said:
Karadalis said:
Sorry but you cannot compare a game that almost ran over a decade with an upstart by the numbers mmo that wants to tripple dip your wallet before it goes f2p.
I absolutely can. As stated already, that is if you bothered to read my post at all, this mount s barely faster than sprinting speed, and that's if you are sprinting while riding the thing. I played the last beta, I rode the mount. It's not as impressive as you give it credit for. At normal speed you might as well dismount and run to the nearest battle. What advantage in PvP is there besides giving your opponent the ability to see you coming from a mile away, giving them ample time to set up defenses? It's there to look good, and again, I seriously doubt that Zenimax is going to charge anywhere close to the insane prices Activision charges for their mounts. It's a go-between for players not buying the deluxe edition.
Can I say that I think that WoW is horribly overpriced too (main reason I don't play it) and sink your argument right now? This monetization strategy is shit, WoW just manages to get away with it because they've somehow managed to convince people that they're worth it, but TESO hasn't. Plus, WoW has features such as a pre-existing community, a well known history of generally doing right by the players, and a reputation of being a decent game. TESO has none of these, so there's no fucking way it should be attempting to pull off a monetization strategy so bold. Really I don't think any game should cost so much to play.

Also, arguing that a mount in an MMO (or Elder Scrolls game) doesn't give any sort of advantage is pure, steaming bullshit and you know it. Feel free to offer up good points as to why TESO is worth the sort of money that I don't even think WoW is worth, but don't feed me crap like that. We've all played MMOs, we've all played Elder Scrolls games, we know that mounts are really fucking useful. Saying shit like that only hurts your chances of convincing anyone of anything and makes people think you're a fanboy for a game that isn't even out yet.
 

Colt47

New member
Oct 31, 2012
1,065
0
0
My only complaint about ESO at the moment is that it needs to get bug fixes out and fast. The game might be okay after they get everything working properly, but I'd advise against buying into ESO on launch day. We also wont really know 100% if the approach the company is taking to mix and matching the online genre and the sandbox "do as one wants" approach until there's more people playing the game regularly.
 

SecondPrize

New member
Mar 12, 2012
1,436
0
0
Mega Messiah said:
Everything I've seen, played, and read about ESO screams cash grab that's going F2P in like a year.

Seriously, fuck off with a cash shop ON TOP of a sub and then offering something like a horse.
The term cash shop means a very specific thing when applied to MMOs. ESO doesn't have a cash shop on top of a sub, it doesn't have a cash shop period.
 

freaper

snuggere mongool
Apr 3, 2010
1,196
0
0
This will be F2P before next year's holiday season, and I'm not even sure yet if I'll be willing to play it then.
 

cerebus23

New member
May 16, 2010
1,275
0
0
Drummodino said:
So let me get this straight.

1. Full retail up front cost.
2. Monthly subscription fee.
3. Microtransaction store for non-cosmetic items.

...

Just seems a little bit greedy Zenimax. That's a lot of money you're asking for, especially when compared to something like FF XIV.
It's completely greedy but wow proved you could charge people full price and sub and give them little or nothing for it.

They just seeing how far they can push it in the pure greed dept.

There is NO excuse when charging a sub to play a game to not provide bi monthly content updates for free at bare minimium. maybe 2 or 3 months but charging for expansions? charging for haroses? charging for boosts and the like, you are a f2p game trying to charge a sub and if people fall for it i weep for humanity, but they will and they will in droves and the next generation of greed is justified.
 

suitepee7

I can smell sausage rolls
Dec 6, 2010
1,273
0
0
Falsename said:
....I don't.... This.... I don't even.....

I'm sorry but The Elder Scrolls Online is going to fall flat on it's face moments after coming out.

People will pay subscription for a game that looks this good, sure. But it won't last if you're cramming this crap down our throats.

'Some' people will pay subscription. I'm not one of them.

Bring me Fallout 4!
and bring on the announcement of "we have decided to make the fallout MMO instead, and cease working on FO4!"

i can understand charging for a mount, if it is simply a skin (horse armour for once kinda makes sense). but having to buy the actual ability to ride the mount is just fucking greedy. didn't old republic pull this shit when they went free to play?
 

Riff Moonraker

New member
Mar 18, 2010
944
0
0
This is not good. Not good at all. I was looking forward to the game, and was going to try and purchase the Imperial edition for my xbox one in the next week or so. But now.... I dont know.
 

SecondPrize

New member
Mar 12, 2012
1,436
0
0
suitepee7 said:
Falsename said:
....I don't.... This.... I don't even.....

I'm sorry but The Elder Scrolls Online is going to fall flat on it's face moments after coming out.

People will pay subscription for a game that looks this good, sure. But it won't last if you're cramming this crap down our throats.

'Some' people will pay subscription. I'm not one of them.

Bring me Fallout 4!
and bring on the announcement of "we have decided to make the fallout MMO instead, and cease working on FO4!"

i can understand charging for a mount, if it is simply a skin (horse armour for once kinda makes sense). but having to buy the actual ability to ride the mount is just fucking greedy. didn't old republic pull this shit when they went free to play?
You don't have to buy the ability to ride a mount with cash. You can buy a mount with 17k gold. It's just kind of a pain in the ass on your first character, so they added a cheap mount as part of the CE, and now they're allowing people to buy just that portion of the CE with a different skin. TOR went full asshole and charges for more quickslot bars and the ability to equip 'epic' gear, among other things.
 

Starke

New member
Mar 6, 2008
3,876
0
0
Halyah said:
Starke said:
Halyah said:
I'm starting to get The Secret World vibes from this game now...
I'm not... yet. Secret World actually pulled the most popular clothes in the beta, and moved them into the cash shop. We'll see in two weeks, but I don't see that happening here.
They did? That's pretty douchy... Captcha seems to agree a tad given it says its "taken aback" and all.
Off the top of my head, the male leather trench-coat became a 10 dollar item, the men's shirts with ties became 4 dollars each. The female leather jacket with embroidered designs became a 5 dollar item, the men's poncho became a 4 dollar item... the punk and racing jackets for women all became 2 or 3 dollar items.

Really, anything that didn't look like shit got bundled into the store... oddly it was almost everything I saw frequently on players during the beta. Of course, we're also talking about the game that pumped out a 100 dollar tux... and answered complaints about augments drops being crap by releasing them as a possible drop in a grab bag that goes for 1.30, or 3.33... ugh.