Oh man of the past, for who object permanence is just out of reach, fear not! We in the future have been able to see something and remember its existence for longer than one second after its gone from our senses. It was a difficult adjustment many of us made in our first year on this earth, so I have no doubt you can catch up in the next 6-10 months with proper diet and study.
If you had some memory capacity you might have noticed a phrase that goes thusly:
"There are no ties between Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic – plain and simple. No ownership ties,
no software leasing, no business at all between them. In 2009, (that’s more than a decade ago) Smartmatic licensed scanning machines from Dominion for use in The Philippines for a Smartmatic election project. Our one contract with Dominion was short-lived and ended in a lawsuit. That was the first and last time that Smartmatic and Dominion tried to do business together."
The part many of us remember is the lawsuit part. And us with object permanence would think on such things, and mayhaps stumble upon this:
Smartmatic International Corp., et al. v. Dominion Voting Systems International Corporation, et al.
law.justia.com
Because reading more than once sentence has been established to be beyond your capacity currently, I shall quote from the Facts statement directly:
" In October 2009, Dominion granted Smartmatic a worldwide (except for the United States and Canada) nonexclusive license to certain precinct count optical scan(―PCOS‖) voting systems that Dominion had developed (the ―License Agreement‖or the ―Agreement‖)."