Extra Punctuation: What is Mature Anyway?

Recommended Videos

BrotherRool

New member
Oct 31, 2008
3,833
0
0
I think the problem is that it's the immature stuff you want to keep away from immature people and not the mature stuff.

Don't feed the trolls, right?
 

TastyCarcass

New member
Jul 27, 2009
141
0
0
I feel a strange motivation to unthinkingly defend Duke Nukem Forever. It's the same mindless instinct that makes me offended when people talk shit about the UK, even though I don't live there anymore because it's a grey, flat, miserable place more hung up on its past glory than William Shatner. I guess because Duke Nukem 3D was an important fixture in my teenage emotional development, which probably explains why I still greet women by tossing them fivers.

UNTHINKING DEFENCE MODE ACTIVATED!

Well I live in the Lake District, Cumbria, where it's nice and green and mountainy so fuck you and your barbeques Yahtzee!
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,648
0
0
debossman21 said:
Yahtzee has a point. I think this illustrates it very well.
http://satwcomic.com/anything-but-that

And while America isn't the only one, we certainly make the biggest deal out of it.
Appropriately, that game is one of the only well-known games released in recent years to never get an ESRB rating because it is only sold online.

Which I think is what ought to start happening. Now that there's no fear of our government stepping in and imposing some sort of rating system on the industry, game companies are free to release their games without a rating. Publishers probably still won't bite, since there are potential lost sales at stake, but at least the whole "if we don't rate our games, the big bad gummint will!" argument is dead.
 

PrinceofPersia

New member
Sep 17, 2010
321
0
0
You know all this talk of the double standard between depictions of violence and the depictions of sex reminds me of all that whining and complaining Fox did about Mass Effect 1 and their "Se'xbox'" bits. Really just made me shake my head and want to send a letter to all those who work at Fox to act their age not their shoe size.
 

Loonerinoes

New member
Apr 9, 2009
889
0
0
Not that I'm saying that being able to ogle Sub-Zero's fat juicy combat boner would significantly improve the quality and tone of the game, but it is indicative of the attitudes involved that you can have all the unflichingly realistic gore in the world but the moment you want to extend that realism to full sexual anatomy then all the little boys shy away with red-faced titters. What are you, gay?
My favourite part, made me chuckle a lot.

Another awesome piece. I'd say the thing about the article noticing violence as being a lot less repressed than sexuality in videogames comes from the following. Most videogames are made BY and FOR America. And if there's one thing that stands true about America, it's John Cleese's analysis.

"Oh, it's simple. With them it's always all about sex."

Either the suggestiveness gone out of proportions to the point they might as well telegraph it as well as through censors calling for 'maturity', including to the more 'hip' online community preachers judging it by their own personal tastes and biases.

Which is wholly unsurprising why you found that Witcher 2 boob scene appropriate, given that it comes from a European developer. Granted, they also did the card thing in Witcher 1 and it's still aimed for the American market primarily, since they are the main body of consumers...but shaddap, it's still an improvement. :p
 

legend forge

New member
Mar 26, 2010
109
0
0
My parents used the ratings on games with regard to how I was behaving at the time. They would let me rent or buy games based on how mature I was acting, as opposed to my literal age. When I was really young that didn't come up as much, it was E or bust, but when I was a teenager I could rent or buy M games as long as I was being mature enough that they thought I could handle them. I think the system where it just lists the content would be a great way to encourage more parents to be aware of the content in games and maybe encourage awareness of what their specific kid could handle.
 

bombadilillo

New member
Jan 25, 2011
738
0
0
Kahunaburger said:
bombadilillo said:
Kahunaburger said:
bombadilillo said:
No, MK fatalities are literally impossible for the most part, A manly man could do what Kratos does.

One is possible one is impossible. Perfect difference. (I guess you cant really bone a Goddess)
Sex and violence, in the real world, don't work the way they do in God of War. Neither does architecture. (Because everything is stylized in that game.) So no, there isn't a huge difference.
What does stylized have anything to do with it, thats a filter that is a different thing entirely to the content. I can put a black and white filter over a porn and stylize it and its still a porn. The violence is ripping horns of a ogre, the sex is having sex with a woman.
That's kind of silly - unless the sex you have is with bizarrely-proportioned people who don't use birth control and lasts 30 seconds, I don't think you could call God of War sex "realistic" with a straight face. In other words, the whole "unrealistic/stylized violence against imaginary creature = okay, unrealistic/stylized sex between imaginary people = WILL SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!1!!" argument doesn't hold water.
Yeah, your wrong. But keep thinking misrepresenting the whole thread if you want. Whatever lets you sleep at night.

If you really can't see the difference between sex and violence in society, ask yourself why do can you play football in high school but not join the schools porn club? There is a difference, and your pretending and wanting there not to be doesnt magically make it so.

This whole discussion started from whining like you just said "SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN" Thats your hyperbole and its the problem. 20 comments later. Still the same think, misrepresenting it as some sort of mythical screaming Simpsons preacher wife. Thats the only thing ridiculous here. Your non position that from beginning to end is based on strawman hyperbole to have the least bit of traction.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
bombadilillo said:
Kahunaburger said:
bombadilillo said:
Kahunaburger said:
bombadilillo said:
No, MK fatalities are literally impossible for the most part, A manly man could do what Kratos does.

One is possible one is impossible. Perfect difference. (I guess you cant really bone a Goddess)
Sex and violence, in the real world, don't work the way they do in God of War. Neither does architecture. (Because everything is stylized in that game.) So no, there isn't a huge difference.
What does stylized have anything to do with it, thats a filter that is a different thing entirely to the content. I can put a black and white filter over a porn and stylize it and its still a porn. The violence is ripping horns of a ogre, the sex is having sex with a woman.
That's kind of silly - unless the sex you have is with bizarrely-proportioned people who don't use birth control and lasts 30 seconds, I don't think you could call God of War sex "realistic" with a straight face. In other words, the whole "unrealistic/stylized violence against imaginary creature = okay, unrealistic/stylized sex between imaginary people = WILL SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!1!!" argument doesn't hold water.
Yeah, your wrong. But keep thinking misrepresenting the whole thread if you want. Whatever lets you sleep at night.
Clearly you have some idea or argument that you aren't communicating clearly to the rest of us. So please explain what you want to say clearly - otherwise it won't be possible to have a discussion. Also, don't get angry at people for failure to read your mind :)
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,429
0
0
Yahtzee Croshaw said:
Now, admittedly this is a policy that ultimately leads to children suffering emotional scarring or even death, but there comes a time when you have to stop letting that sort of thing bother you, generally when you're riding the bus home at around the time the schools close.
Preach it brother.

You want something that scares you far more than anything an 18 certificate puts out?


Your parents still think about doing it. To each other. Perhaps they still do after you sleep.

So do your grandparents.

Your kids probably have already thought about it.

Ask your mum how you were born, one day.
 

lokiduck

New member
Jun 5, 2010
359
0
0
Thank you Yahtzee, really thank you. I have to admit that I was bothered by DNF but only because of the comments on videos on Youtube talking about how it's okay to laugh at rape, besides the fact that vagina doors and wall boobs next to impregnated naked women moaning just plain creeps me out.

But I was born in 1990, these games were not meant for me... especially since I am a straight woman, but I really like what you said.

it does bother me how much people are upset by nudity in anything, especially since there is some pretty twisted shit going on tha tis allowed, but I do like your rating by book pictures idea, XD it could work. I wonder what games and movies would have pictures of Alex from Clockwork Orange though XD
 

debossman21

New member
Jun 7, 2011
67
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
debossman21 said:
Yahtzee has a point. I think this illustrates it very well.
http://satwcomic.com/anything-but-that

And while America isn't the only one, we certainly make the biggest deal out of it.
Appropriately, that game is one of the only well-known games released in recent years to never get an ESRB rating because it is only sold online.

Which I think is what ought to start happening. Now that there's no fear of our government stepping in and imposing some sort of rating system on the industry, game companies are free to release their games without a rating. Publishers probably still won't bite, since there are potential lost sales at stake, but at least the whole "if we don't rate our games, the big bad gummint will!" argument is dead.
thats not the argument im making at all. i was merely pointing out the whole "sex = ban" thing.
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
Yeah, the "mature" label is very ironically named. It used to be a term likened to advanced or wisened, not the existance of boobs (something we ate from for the first months of our lives). Violence isn't much better, as if quanitiy of blood is represenitve of the impact. I saw more than a few slasher flims in my younger days and was never bothered by the acts of Jason or Freddie as much as say the death of Bambi's mother, the shooting of Old Yeller, or the darker parts of the Neverending Story.

So much of me agrees to dump the system entirely. It served some purpose years ago when we bought or rented or saw things largely in ignorance, but with the internet, we can look up God of War, dragon Age or anything and get a handle of the intensity level of things outselves. Sadly that takes work for a crowd of people that may not take the effort to read a rating label put in front of them, let alone do a google search. I'd like to add depth to things. You know, breking out grades of violence, language, nudity, and overall conent and explaining why they got those ratings. Sadly again, the back of game boxes is alread too full of legal crap to leave much room for screenshots. That would just put a novel on the back.
 

BehattedWanderer

Fell off the Alligator.
Jun 24, 2009
5,237
0
0
Nice point. Thinking past the immediate "Whoooooaaaa!" moment of the aforementioned pencil scene in TDK is a much, much more horrific happening than what happens to the meat clusters in Mortal Kombat. But maybe that's the difference itself--a thinking pain. Without the faculties to imagine the gruesomeness of the results, the more visceral, bloody, broken bones/ruptured artery imagery is worse. It's the the same line of thought that the first layers of hell are the emotional layers, but the worst crimes, those punished further down, are the crimes where things are often smaller, more precise, more thought out. The personal or intellectual crimes, if you will. It's in the same light that the Heavy Rain Sequence sits so much more uncomfortably on the psyche than ripping off someone's legs in God of war.
 

BonGookKumBop

New member
Feb 24, 2010
60
0
0
CyricZ said:
I do have to give some credit to the ESRB in that they are including content descriptors and actual paragraphs that describe fully the content in the game. Of course, that can only work so far when you realize that the masses need to go to the website and actually look this stuff up in order to get this info.

Ah well, I've been telling myself lately that we're gradually getting better at this, that nothing noticeably changes even in one generation. So we set the precedent and let history sort us.
I have to fully agree with this. The letter on the box is almost meaningless and the single phrase descriptors of the reasons for the ratings are only slightly informative. I do, however, appreciate the short rating explanations that you can find on the website for newer games. We could probably get away without a rating system that the government can use to regulate, but I do advocate parents having some control over what their children play. whattheyplay.com has some decent information, but it is generally behind the release schedule. The ESRB information is detailed and available a month before the release date; you just have to do your own homework to find it.
 

G Skunk

New member
Apr 19, 2010
70
0
0
Isn't it funny that when "mature, high-minded, forward-thinking" people start talking about sex, their heads IMMEDIATELY disappear up their asses?

I dunno, I find that kinda funny.
 

DoctorPhil

New member
Apr 25, 2011
262
0
0
I think the most mature games are the ones who aren't afraid of being childish.

That being said, there are limits, when I saw this, I never played Super Mario Galaxy again.

siiiiiigh.
 

Shjade

Chaos in Jeans
Feb 2, 2010
838
0
0
Dak_N_Jaxter said:
Shjade said:
Dak_N_Jaxter said:
What was more horrific? That one chick getting cut up by Alien hordes, or Woody and his friends being thrown into furnace?
Definitely the chick getting cut up.

Does that make it more mature? No.
I would disagree personally on the grounds that character investment was more intense for Toy Story.
Character investment increases tragedy and pain, not so much horror. I'd be just as horrified by a car crash sawing a stranger in half in front of me as I would if it did so to, say, my sister. It's equally nauseating and visceral either way; one just causes more emotional pain than the other.

That said, as the poster above you pointed out, nothing happens to the toys, so why would that be anywhere near comparable to someone getting hacked up?

That and, y'know. They're toys. Plastic. They go through the motions, but I have a hard time picturing how it would physically hurt. Would it be terrible that their consciousness was snuffed out? Sure, okay. Not particularly horrifying though.
 

Worr Monger

New member
Jan 21, 2008
868
0
0
Yahtzee Croshaw said:
Anyway, one of the iconic features of the first Witcher game was that there was a collectible sidequest based around notching your bedpost, wherein you acquired a nudey picture of a female character when Geralt successfully bones her (perhaps a close-up picture of Geralt's new venereal disease would have been more appropriate)
Probably sad that instead of laughing at this... my first thought was "Silly Yahtzee... if you actually played through The Witcher, you would know that Geralt is immune to disease"