I find all this media censorship aimed at children just a "get-out-of-parenting-free-card" designed for the people who'd rather park their children in front of a TV than take an interest in their upbringing.
I do understand why people rely on television (and more recently computers/internet/interactive media/whatever) to help keep their kids busy and out of trouble while they work to put food on the table, since it was for the most part how I too grew up.
Both parents had to work and in the time between school and when they'd get home I would mostly spend time in front of the tv or at the computer. Also due to very, very lax regulation of content where I grew up, I also got to consume what would be considered adult oriented media from quite an early age (more or less with my parent's knowledge). I think I watched my first porn movie at around 10. I was certainly playing stuff like Quake and Mortal Kombat by then. Ultra-violent movies were really nothing uncommon. And yet I didn't grow up to be a serial-rapist eating babies for breakfast strangely enough. And this I put down to 2 things
1 exposure to "mature" media isn't as bad for children as people think it is
2 I actually received a good education from my parents that allowed me to put all the "inappropriate" content into a healthy perspective early on and assimilate it with my own mental faculties and form my own damn opinions on it. I feel it ultimately led to a better personal development and made me a better adjusted person than censoring and denying it ever could have.
Finally I feel that proper explanation and education concerning the content, putting in a healthy and mature perspective early on is much better than outright banning the content.
Children are going to be exposed to this kind of stuff. On the street, the internet, some randomly discarded magazine... whatever. It will happen, and since these things are never put in the correct light for them by their parents, they could then do some of the damage everyone is so worried about.
You teach your kid how to cross the street, despite it being dangerous, so he can actually better avoid the danger when you won't be holding his hand. What exactly makes "mature" content any different? Why not gradually prepare your kid and educate him on the matter so he can be better prepared to understand and assimilate the content when it does show up?
Sure, that doesn't mean forcing 6-year-olds to watch a full gruesome decapitation, or a 6-hooker anal spectacular, because that might just really scar them for life. But a gradual approach to normal mature content might just make them better prepared for when they will watch that stuff at 7, on the internet, while the parents are asleep.
I do understand why people rely on television (and more recently computers/internet/interactive media/whatever) to help keep their kids busy and out of trouble while they work to put food on the table, since it was for the most part how I too grew up.
Both parents had to work and in the time between school and when they'd get home I would mostly spend time in front of the tv or at the computer. Also due to very, very lax regulation of content where I grew up, I also got to consume what would be considered adult oriented media from quite an early age (more or less with my parent's knowledge). I think I watched my first porn movie at around 10. I was certainly playing stuff like Quake and Mortal Kombat by then. Ultra-violent movies were really nothing uncommon. And yet I didn't grow up to be a serial-rapist eating babies for breakfast strangely enough. And this I put down to 2 things
1 exposure to "mature" media isn't as bad for children as people think it is
2 I actually received a good education from my parents that allowed me to put all the "inappropriate" content into a healthy perspective early on and assimilate it with my own mental faculties and form my own damn opinions on it. I feel it ultimately led to a better personal development and made me a better adjusted person than censoring and denying it ever could have.
Finally I feel that proper explanation and education concerning the content, putting in a healthy and mature perspective early on is much better than outright banning the content.
Children are going to be exposed to this kind of stuff. On the street, the internet, some randomly discarded magazine... whatever. It will happen, and since these things are never put in the correct light for them by their parents, they could then do some of the damage everyone is so worried about.
You teach your kid how to cross the street, despite it being dangerous, so he can actually better avoid the danger when you won't be holding his hand. What exactly makes "mature" content any different? Why not gradually prepare your kid and educate him on the matter so he can be better prepared to understand and assimilate the content when it does show up?
Sure, that doesn't mean forcing 6-year-olds to watch a full gruesome decapitation, or a 6-hooker anal spectacular, because that might just really scar them for life. But a gradual approach to normal mature content might just make them better prepared for when they will watch that stuff at 7, on the internet, while the parents are asleep.