Science actually says the complete opposite. There are no different races in the species homo sapiens: http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htmMacsen Wledig said:"Just science actually"Rozalia1 said:Seems legitimate, few can argue from a strong position against them due to hypocrisy.
People are against this, but for splitting up men and women in "actual" sports because of biological differences...yet not for splitting based on race grounds even though different races are more suited to spiriting, endurance running, swimming, RTS, and the like because well...that'd be "racist" (just science in actuality).
Care to back that up with a scientific publication or do we just take your word for it?
No, you just don't understand nuanced positions.Rozalia1 said:If you want everyone to play together in everything, or everyone to be segregated further than you can stand strong...otherwise you are hypocritical somewhere.
Just including you for relevance.MarsAtlas said:-snip-
Please, don't be silly.. the very highlight of the tournament is stoning to death any male players who made the mistake of choosing Jaina or Valeera.feauxx said:So are Jaina and Valeera also not allowed to be played as hero's in this tournament? (a HS tournament without miracle rogues lol) Hearthstone does not segregate, tournaments shouldn't either.
Video games will never be considered sports because there is no athletic factor to them. Video games are just that -- video games. It's not belittling anyone's interests nor is it saying they can't like it. I happen to enjoy watching Street Fighter tournaments, I wouldn't ever consider it a sport, and even the term e-sport is super silly to me. It should be called what it all really is - Competitive Gaming.clippen05 said:Ever consider that just because you have no interest in something, that doesn't mean that other people can't like it? I make absolutely zero dollars off of E-Sports, same as I make off of regular sports, but I enjoy watching soccer and competitive CS:GO just the same. I treat them as equal, no matter what types of skills they require. How about you stop belittling people's interests?shadowmagus said:FYI guys, the only people who consider e-sports an actual sport are the people who play and stand to make a living off of e-sports. For the rest of us, it's called a video game.
That's what I thought, but I was wondering if that clown could cash the checks his mouth was writing.RoonMian said:Science actually says the complete opposite. There are no different races in the species homo sapiens: http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htmMacsen Wledig said:"Just science actually"Rozalia1 said:Seems legitimate, few can argue from a strong position against them due to hypocrisy.
People are against this, but for splitting up men and women in "actual" sports because of biological differences...yet not for splitting based on race grounds even though different races are more suited to spiriting, endurance running, swimming, RTS, and the like because well...that'd be "racist" (just science in actuality).
Care to back that up with a scientific publication or do we just take your word for it?
No, you just don't understand nuanced positions.Rozalia1 said:If you want everyone to play together in everything, or everyone to be segregated further than you can stand strong...otherwise you are hypocritical somewhere.
Edit:MarsAtlas said:-snip-
And not positive. Discrimination in any form is negative and degrading to both genders, there really needs to be laws requiring 100% equal rules for both genders in everything, basically requiring that everyone is seen as a person not a chromosome.Gamer87 said:There is nothing wrong with positive discrimination except that it's insulting. And unfair.Pinky said:Chess effectively does positive discrimination for women (and there is nothing inherently wrong with positive discrimination). You have a mixed circuit and a women only circuit.tzimize said:On an off topic note, this got me thinking. Does rules like this exist in for example world championships in chess?
Exactly. They're talking about quarterfinals which is what the RO8 is. They don't want a guy to get eliminated by someone who can't even end up moving forward in the tournament.Zhukov said:What is "RO8"?
I googled it, but all I got was acronyms for "round of eight".
Physical differences between men and women are significant in physical sports because raw physical abilities regularly determine the outcome of contests. E-sports makes use of far more complex systems of intelligence than contemporary neuroscience is capable of measuring, most likely involving some level of neuro-plasticity to reshape networks for faster reactions to stimuli.johnsarif said:I find it very strange that some of you think it's OK to segregate men and women in physical competition but at the same time argue that there shouldn't be any segregation in eSports. More disturbing is the fact that you accept the fact that men and women are different physically but you don't accept the fact that there are also differences between the brains of men and women.
http://www.livescience.com/2855-brains-wired-differently-men-women.html
http://www.livescience.com/3808-men-women-differently.html
These are some articles I found in a cursory search. There's probably more you can find. This one is also very good but it's more on the psychological side (which can affect performance).
http://bsb-lab.org/site/wp-content/uploads/DelGiudice_etal_2012_global-sex-differences_personality_pone.pdf
Of course, we need more specialized studies to see if differences in brain wiring truly warrant segregation in eSports but to dismiss the idea of segregation out of hand is a bit lazy.
That was a beautiful analogy, thank you.Shamanic Rhythm said:To use the kind of base-line cognitive ability tested in those studies as evidence to argue for segregation of e-sports would be analogous to holding a cooking competition and segregating it by gender because the men have more physical strength and can therefore chop faster.
I have to wonder if this could be a factor. Starcraft (and gaming in general) is huge in SKorea and it occurs to me that there might have been a....."cultural inertia", for lack of a better term. If it was like that from its early beginning, perhaps no thought has been giving to modifying it?roseofbattle said:IeSF is a global organization based in South Korea with the aim to promote e-sports as a "true sport." By doing so, it divides tournaments into male and female competitions.
MarsAtlas said:Not entirely true.. A lot of people proclaim this, and while there is actual scientific evidence that supports their conclusion, that evidence is too limited in scope. It usually only examines at individual countries. Take the drug BiDil, for example[footnote]http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4706682. Its a drug that the FDA approved for use only in people of a certain race. Sounds logical, given the evidence, but if you examine people of the same race in different countries, results vary differently from the studies done in the United States. While the differences did indeed exist, its not because of their race, but from their ancestry, which is influenced by tons of minor and major factors. Division based on race is woefully inept for a lot of reasons, just in the same way judging somebody's physical capability solely on their sex. Similarly, a lot of sports are starting mixed-gender competition, including MMA fighting.
Yes I knew that would be called out, with differences being cultural instead of racial, and that it isn't a real term and such. Its still in use so I can use it, and its also an easy identifier.RoonMian said:Science actually says the complete opposite. There are no different races in the species homo sapiens: http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm