First Fallout: New Vegas Trailer Hits the Tubes
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
This might me the next gen Fallout for me. Was not interested in DC's wasteland much.
Talk about stark contrast. I had a Rapture from Bioshock flashback when Vegas was shown
Talk about stark contrast. I had a Rapture from Bioshock flashback when Vegas was shown
Please excuse me while I drool uncontrollably over in that corner *points at a corner*
A.K.A. I thoroughly enjoyed Fallout 3, and this looks good.
As in, I'll buy it when it comes out. It is 'one of those' games.
A.K.A. I thoroughly enjoyed Fallout 3, and this looks good.
As in, I'll buy it when it comes out. It is 'one of those' games.
Let's hope that Obsidian knows how to release a game that is glitch free unlike Bethesda. Sorry but I did not think that Fallout 3 deserved all of those "10/10" and "Perfect" Reviews right after release. I'm not saying that Fallout 3 was bad, but DLC glitches, accepting handout from Microsoft, glitchy game to begin with, not as expansive with the NPCs as Oblivion, (come on where were the changing conversation topics and emotional options?),and a crappy shooting mechanic. Fallout 3 was a decent amount from perfect.
Also considering the moral evolution (more like de-evolution) that would be the place that gets power and maintenance.UglyShirts said:Which almost makes a sort of sense, I guess, if this follows F3 canon. I mean, in the event of nuclear exchange with the Chinese, it makes a certain amount of sense that D.C. would be rubble. It's a political and military center. The national capital. But why would an enemy button-pusher waste a warhead on Vegas? It's an entertainment destination. Maybe if the enemy were some sort of religious/moralist one instead of a political opponent, sure. "Sin City" is a cinder. But that's not the storyline F3 set up.Blanks said:Vegas was looking pretty intact there
It'll be interesting to see which game "does" Vegas better...This one, or Dead Rising 2 (which isn't technically set in Vegas, but it's clearly the inspiration).
I liked 3, this looks pretty much identical. I would almost bet money this one is getting pushed back though.
So did Bethesda with Fallout 3. Fallout 2 had more thing you could do in it than Fallout 3. I;m actually glad that Obsidian as taking development duties. Maybe they won't take a MS handout.rockytheboxer said:
HOLY SHIT! I THOUGHT IT WAS IN DEVELOPMENT HELL! *smacks himself*
with all the law suits its a wonder this games is gonna be releasd
with all the law suits its a wonder this games is gonna be releasd
Pretty sure this is yet another instance of Obsidian getting the gig doing a sequel to a franchise they've had little to nothing to do with, and doing a piss poor job of it, as they have been doing with Bioware games for years.
Their games are akin to straight-to-DVD low budget sequels, and it boggles me how these guys manage to stay employed.
Their games are akin to straight-to-DVD low budget sequels, and it boggles me how these guys manage to stay employed.
This Year?
Cool!
I don't know about the robot, looks like a vending machine.
And what are Helghast doing in Fallout?
Cool!
I don't know about the robot, looks like a vending machine.
And what are Helghast doing in Fallout?
I'm one of those Bethesda haters. They butchered Fallout and turned the deep RPG gameplay with loads of moral paths THAT ACTUALLY MENT SOMETHING into a console kiddie, ADD pew pew pew fest with a few upgradable stats and only one moral choice that influenced the game world in a big way .