Not really sure that president Obama has ANYTHING to do with the NEA... they really like blaming him for EVERYTHING there.
And they ignored him.Ace IV said:King_Serpent said:Did you ever listen to how they introduced the segment? They introduced it by twisting it to sound bad already: "Should the videogame Call of Duty get federal funding?"And then the dude corrected them.King_Serpent said:They titled the debate "should Call of Duty get federal funding" they set the stage in the radio host favor and you know it.
You, good sir, win "most hilarious comment of the day".trooperpaul said:ZeroMachine said:You have a constitution to rival Dwarves, friend.trooperpaul said:Get a drink, watch Fox News, and take a sip every time they lie, blow something out of proportion, or use strawman attacks. My record was 20 minutes conscious.The funniest part? it wasn't even alcohol. I passed out from sugar overdose. . .Drago-Morph said:You must have Herculean alcohol tolerance levels.trooperpaul said:Get a drink, watch Fox News, and take a sip every time they lie, blow something out of proportion, or use strawman attacks. My record was 20 minutes conscious.
OT: Stop feeding the trolls, don't put Fox on this site.
I laughed. Well done sir.Oscar90 said:Why won't people understand how easy it is to solve problems with assasination?
Yup.Ace IV said:Nope, no one mentioned Call of Duty after he made the correctionZeroMachine said:And then the dude corrected them.
Hahahahaha! I honestly hope you're not serious. I mean... I HONESTLY hope you're not serious...Ace IV said:They set up the debate so people could hear a different point of view. The dude from FNC never took a side, as good reporters don't. Stop blaming Fox for reporting the news in an honest wayZeroMachine said:They set up the debate so the guy opposing video games would ignore every point the other guy made. Fox is just as much at fault for this as that asshole radio guy.Ace IV said:Fox didn't do anything wrong, they had a debate. Your ire should be directed at the dude who was arguing against video games as art, not FNC itself.
You must have missed the part where Fox asked if Call of Duty should get federal funding, completely ignoring the facts of the situation. That's not honest reporting, it's utterly misleading.Ace IV said:They set up the debate so people could hear a different point of view. The dude from FNC never took a side, as good reporters don't. Stop blaming Fox for reporting the news in an honest wayZeroMachine said:They set up the debate so the guy opposing video games would ignore every point the other guy made. Fox is just as much at fault for this as that asshole radio guy.Ace IV said:Fox didn't do anything wrong, they had a debate. Your ire should be directed at the dude who was arguing against video games as art, not FNC itself.
That's the problem with Fox News. When presented with facts that contradict their opinion, they start to shout and shout until the other party is so annoyed that they just stop talking and leave.Tom Goldman said:...
Ambrozy does his best to express this fact, but is somewhat overshadowed by the loud, outspoken words of Asbury. "Hey, maybe we should start giving taxpayer money to ping-pong players," Asbury says, not seeming to understand that a ping-pong player and a videogame developer are two entirely different professions. He adds that organizations like the NEA are "stretching the limits of wastefulness," becoming a "perversion" of what they were originally intended to be, all in regards to the changed criteria.
...