Andy Chalk said:
Atomysk said:
I really HATE when a scum sucking blogger goes on a rampage against a news organization for political/social differences, it's disgraceful.
I just want to make sure I have this straight: Fox News essentially makes up an issue out of nothing but anti-gaming hysteria, accuses game publishers of being "glib" about violence, digs up some "expert" who claims, straight up, that videogames cause rape, provides absolutely no testimony to counter that statement, yet it bears absolutely no responsibility for that statement?
Is that your position?
Is it Fox News' responsibility to counter a statement of idiocy? Should the author have fabricated something to counter it? The companies involved would not even talk about it with Fox. If you don't defend your stance/principles/or work who do you expect to do it? Should Fox News have contacted you Mr. Chalk?
Did you not read the article you linked to and took the time to rant about?
?If a younger kid experiences Bulletstorm's explicit language and violence, the damage could be significant,? Dr. Jerry Weichman, a clinical psychologist at the Hoag Neurosciences Institute in Southern California, told FoxNews.com. : Do you disagree with this? Should we scrap the ESRB rating completely because children wouldn't be harmed by this content?
?Violent video games like Bulletstorm have the potential to send the message that violence and insults with sexual innuendos are the way to handle disputes and problems,? Weichman said.: Is this just a complete fabrication, total bullshit? I can see this being very true as video games and all media shape the culture around them.
?Between a great ratings system, parental controls on the consoles and the major retailers inhibiting the sale of Mature-rated games to minors, the matter is really one for parents and adults to consider, individually,? Hal Halpin, the president of the similar Entertainment Consumers Association, told FoxNews.com. ?I respect the creative rights of game developers to make a game like Bulletstorm in the same way that I appreciate Quentin Tarantino's right to make over-the-top movies like Kill Bill." : Is there something significant that Hal left out here that would give even more weight to the industries side of this debate? I couldn't have said it better myself.
I agree that this is a non-issue, this article was written to create what little controversy could be made to grab people's attention. DID YOU NOT DO THE EXACT SAME THING??? Did you not entitle this article, "Fox News Says Bulletstorm Could Make You a Rapist" firmly blaming Fox News for the idiocy of one yes ONE psychiatrist. (No a news organization does not hold any blame for what a single person says at all, I wouldn't blame you if someone you interviewed said all white men should be cleansed from the world)
Controversy sells and that's why YOU made one about how FOX made one. Yet somehow, you have the moral high ground? Your reporting is somehow honest, even though blatantly not? Fox News is the one filled with LIES and twisting of facts, when the TITLE of your article is an absolute slander? What is your position other than that of a self-righteous blowhard opportunist?