rolls eyes" I dont care what the official definition is. When I think of a feminist that I like its someone who doesnt havent to peg everything as sexist to justify her paranoid mentality. Like say when they tried to peg the last of us,bioshock infinite, borderlands 2(also racist btw lol) tomb raider, etc etc I could go on.
One thats not radical is one that shows reason typically labeled as a sex positive feminist would be where I align. The actual definition just sounds like basic feminism to me and the radical at the beginning just sounds like someone trying to shake off its previous negative connotations.
For the record if you have to preface.(ie: radical is not that radical) and just about everyone associated with this philosophy does that its probably safe to go ahead and take out the radical in the name. Itd be like calling me hair on head rbstewart when Im in fact bald?! lol
You guys should go ahead and tackle the arguement that says that it makes more sense to align yourself with the label of humanitarian. Im curious to see how you go after that one.
Also if you dont give the opposing argument respect.That thing you do when you give the opposing argument stuff like strawman tshirts or make them out to be smug hipsters(irony) while the other person is essentially the quintesential "just a reasonable human being". Than your using shame as a form of coercion and the opposing side no longer has any respect for you and ergo; no ear for what you have to say. If you guys want to actually reach people with your ideas on this strip(for all I know you dont really care which in case strawman away) your gonna have to do better than that. Both in your counter argument and in respect/view of the opposite opinion.
One thats not radical is one that shows reason typically labeled as a sex positive feminist would be where I align. The actual definition just sounds like basic feminism to me and the radical at the beginning just sounds like someone trying to shake off its previous negative connotations.
For the record if you have to preface.(ie: radical is not that radical) and just about everyone associated with this philosophy does that its probably safe to go ahead and take out the radical in the name. Itd be like calling me hair on head rbstewart when Im in fact bald?! lol
You guys should go ahead and tackle the arguement that says that it makes more sense to align yourself with the label of humanitarian. Im curious to see how you go after that one.
Also if you dont give the opposing argument respect.That thing you do when you give the opposing argument stuff like strawman tshirts or make them out to be smug hipsters(irony) while the other person is essentially the quintesential "just a reasonable human being". Than your using shame as a form of coercion and the opposing side no longer has any respect for you and ergo; no ear for what you have to say. If you guys want to actually reach people with your ideas on this strip(for all I know you dont really care which in case strawman away) your gonna have to do better than that. Both in your counter argument and in respect/view of the opposite opinion.