Dfskelleton said:
Wait a minute, wasn't Bioshock an Xbox 360/PC exclusive, until a PS3 edition was released a couple years later? How is the Big Daddy a "Sony All Star"?
OT: This has equal potential to suck or be great.
I have NO idea why Big Daddy is considered a "Playstation" All-star. He WAS Xbox exclusive for awhile. I have the game. It says so right on the cover.
Then again, their other "Playstation" All-stars include the reboot Dante (which will be on 360), Heihachi (whose Tekken games are on both Xbox and Nintendo platforms), Raiden (whose new game was revealed as an Xbox Kinect-supported title and Raiden himself was playable in MGS2 on original Xbox).
And two Coles is still BS. He takes up two slots out of a meager 20-character roster? I don't even care if he has a different playstyle. Smash Bros has characters like Zelda able to turn into Sheik, Samus can lose her armor and fight in her Zero Suit, and even Pokemon trainer can swap out THREE different characters to use in the game. They couldn't do that with Cole?
The lack of Crash, Spyro, Lara Croft, and even Cloud Strife is baffling. Let's be honest here... those games, with those characters, were THE reasons to buy a Playstation back in the day. NOBODY bought a PS3 for Fat Princess.
It's also like they've forgotten they have over 100 Sony-owned, Sony-produced, Sony-exclusive franchises in existence, from the popular (where are ICO/Shadow of the Colossus characters?) to the more obscure (Legend of the Dragoon? Mister Mosquito?), and even then a TON of third-party games are actually exclusive (Heavy Rain? Lair? Haze? Folklore?) or they got their start and popularity on Sony consoles (Legacy of Kain? Xenogears/Xenosaga? Parasite Eve? Silent Hill? Resident Evil?)
Sir Dan is the ONLY character I'm genuinely happy to see, but even then his series has been more dead than HE is.