Well yes apparently, if you point out evils before the gas chambers and your name is Gina Carano
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
I used this exagerrated statement to highlight how stupid is equalizing it with the Rittenhouse situation. I don't think anyone here actually said that, or if they did, i missed it.
Similarly, "wishing death on someone" and not caring that someone died aren't the same, either.
Just to clear things up.
The evil she was pointing out was, uh, getting dunked on for shitty politics? Oh, damn. That’s harsh. I’m so sorry for her.
White women deserve less.
I straight hope all fast food, and low-wage job-dependent businesses go bankrupt for multiple reasons.
1. They are very exploitive, and hierarchy driven
2. We don't need 5 burger places per block
3. It's very likely a majority of the owners are republicans or lean republican
4. It will shift wages up
1. They are very exploitive, and hierarchy driven
2. We don't need 5 burger places per block
3. It's very likely a majority of the owners are republicans or lean republican
4. It will shift wages up
Does this count
also, I linked to a reply making fun of it because I don't feel comfortable directly linking to a Taliban account.
also, I linked to a reply making fun of it because I don't feel comfortable directly linking to a Taliban account.
Yes. A statement that is so stupid, it reaches full boomerang stupidity. I hope this guy like getting kicked in the dick about a million times.
Not all human life, just that specific human life.
That's a subjective opinion you're stating as objective fact. Sloppy.
Gina Carano is a bully.
It's not suprising people bullied back
Also, remember when putting a mask on a child is exactly the same as punching them in the face. It's child abuse and the child needs to be saved from thier clearly evil parents.
The word evil gets thrown around a lot
How many times can I fire a flamethrower over the heads of your family and say "dude, you can't stop me, I have my freedoms!" before you kick my ass for almost flambéing your family?
Party 1: Let's create socialised healthcare and make sure everyone has decent access to medical provision.
Party 2: We're not paying taxes to save the lives of poor people who can't afford their own healthcare.
So, which of those do you think shows more respect for life?
I could not tell, because nothing is ever so simple. There could be unknown consequences where either party ends up inadvertently costing more lives than the other.
Even if I did say "Party 1" or "Party 2", that doesn't justify calling the other party evil.
Except for parts of the democratic party including the leadership that doesn't believe in M4A.
Just because there are two positions doesn't automatically make one Democrat and the other Republican
If one side advocates for quantifiably more harm than the other, and you decide to back the more obviously harmful side based on the idea that there might be unintended consequences without any actual proof, you're a moron.
It's the seatbelt argument in the age of crumplezones.
1) This has nothing to do with the justification of calling the other side "evil", which was the topic
2) Nobody is backing anything, this is just a hypothetical.
3) Harm can not be so easily quantified.
Answer the question. Which of those two parties is most expressing care, compassion and respect for life?
1) I didn't ask you anything about "evil". That's a straw man you've interjected for whatever purpose some way back that isn't important to the question posed.
2) As for "nothing is ever so simple"... "unknown consequences", this again is a straw man, because it's not question of unforeseen consequences. It's also a sort of "God moves in mysterious ways" bullshit that justifies anything at all. You may as well argue in favour of the Nazis whilst you're at it: after all, nothing is simple and there can be unknown consequences, so why not support murdering all the Jews, disabled, etc. and invading most of Europe because it might turn out great?
Functional healthcare systems exist in almost every civilized country aside from the US. There's no reason to assume it won't work. If there were unknown consequences you'd think the half a century that the rest of the world has been experimenting with functional healthcare would have sniffed them out by now.
Sometimes it really is that simple. You have a party that seeks to implement a health care system, and another party which zealously opposes a health care system.
????? Saying, "A lot" is not the same as "All". These are basic word definitions. And I don't want to hear accusations of being a hypocrite from you of all people.