Maybe this makes me the asshole, but I'm kind of amused that despite all the bellyaching, you just can't resist playing into Houseman's little game. Are y'all masochists?
What's wrong with that?I do not think they really care about their fellow humans. They only seem to care for those are on the same side as they are.
I just like watching him try to think.... Just why guys? How does giving him exactly what he wants benefit you in any way shape or form?
Everyone's bored methinks.Maybe this makes me the asshole, but I'm kind of amused that despite all the bellyaching, you just can't resist playing into Houseman's little game. Are y'all masochists?
I get the horrible idea you think you are being clever here.As Agema said, that was just "occasional hostility", and "a wider reading of his comment", if you had known him and been "around [him] for years would in fact reveal a deep, abiding care for [his] fellow humans]. It was just an "expression of frustration at those obstructing the betterment of [his] fellow humans"
Ah, the "I was being ironic" defence to making mistakes. Learnt something from Trump, evidently.The brilliance and wisdom of your sophistry is truly dazzling. Master, you have returned to us.
A lot of people on these forums only care about people so long as they go along with their ideology and once they don't they "are clearly evil and must be destroyed for the good of their ideology."Or, in some cases, the hero succeeds in saving the villain, so both survive.
In other cases, the villain sabotages the hero's attempt at saving him, and willingly goes to his death.
Which hero do you want to be (or do you want to cheer for)? The one who tries their best to save the life of the villain, or one who is just looking for a "socially acceptable reason" to kill others?
Some of you are going to great lengths to justify grave-dancing, and not a single one of you have condemned it. Is this just the state of the world now, or is it just this site that has become so callous?
EitherI get the horrible idea you think you are being clever here.
Unless you forget, Kyle Rittenhouse voluntarily took a gun to a place he never needed to be, prepared to use lethal force as he saw fit. He duly shot three people, two of them fatally. Unfortunately for you, what it does is prove my point about hypocrisy and vacuity that you have sanctimoniously lectured other people about "grave-dancing", and then promptly supplied an apology for a killer.
The sort of sophistry hailed as clever by people who think they are. Seriously, are you trolling or trying to provoke Aristotle into rising from the grave and murdering you for butchering his logic?Either
Words matter = Kyle's words condemn him = Grave-dancing condemns those who do it.
Or
Words don't matter = Grave-dancing is fine = Kyle's words don't condemn him.
Your choice.
In all seriousness, I agree.I'd say words matter, but acts matter more than words.
So the words of someone who said they want to shoot someone AND shot someone have considerably more weight than, let's say, someone wishing death on people who can't be arsed to not spread a virus that produces more dead.
What if your ideology includes caring about people.A lot of people on these forums only care about people so long as they go along with their ideology and once they don't they "are clearly evil and must be destroyed for the good of their ideology."
Dude advises people to poke bear, dude pokes bear, and dude is mauled by bear, it's really not that complicated.A lot of people on these forums only care about people so long as they go along with their ideology and once they don't they "are clearly evil and must be destroyed for the good of their ideology."
So much wasted time spent by people preaching about the evils and stubbornness of religion only for people to replace it with political ideologies.
There's discussion to be had about mass shooters, and how so many of them displayed red flags, also on social media, that were then ignored. But it's the discussion the lawmakers and social media moderation should have.In all seriousness, I agree.
The only problem is, we're viewing this retroactively. Kyle has already killed someone, and we're looking back at his words, with the benefit of hindsight, and saying "oh that makes so much sense! The warning signs were there all along!"
Well, in case of a shooter, those red flags would often signal a desire to use a firearm.So my question is, when someone expresses a callous disregard for human life, is that a red flag? Or does it only BECOME a red flag in hindsight, once someone does something?
Perhaps it could be a red flag that the person might become a radical vigilante?But in case of someone wishing covid death to conscious spreaders? What'd it be? Bioterrorism?