And a policy of everyone gets free lunch is a good policy?
There's not a problem here. Why, you might ask? Because Alito doesn't think there is, therefore there isn't.
I would say so, yes. Though this is also a bit of a distraction from your claim that no needy kids are going without.
Uh-huh, and it also doesn't imply that nobody else could need free lunches.
Yes. I'd rather every child got a free school meal, than a single child slip through the gaps and go hungry.
You've shown no evidence of any kids not getting lunches due to pandemic policy being ended that need them.
Because you've redefined "need them" to mean "are already getting them", in a spectacular display of circular logic.
You've decided that nobody can be "needy" if they're not covered by an existing government program to help the "needy", simply because that program said it helped those who are "needy". If you can't see how hopelessly foolish that is, that's on you.
Here's the real "culture war": People in power trying to use the government to force the rest of us to follow their religion.
The last paragraph is the real issue here.
Not only that.
Plus of course that they've given Biden the opportunity to play dignified, responsible leader and loving father, standing in sharp contrast to Trump's rage-fuelled, throw-shit-at-everything denunciations.
I read a quote from a Republican that Hunter Biden should have been threatened with life in prison unless "he turned on the Big Guy". That's persecution.
I said I don't want to debate what is the criteria for needy because it's gonna be subjective.
Er, is life imprisonment within the sentencing guidelines of what he was charged with? They'd have trouble making that threat convincing if not.
Even under normal economic analysis that could lead to a more productive workforce which would increase GDP/Line go up.
