So then you'll also have to drop your claim that nobody "needy" is going without, since that relies on us accepting the definition you want to use.
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
See above. There is no federal definition of the term "needy". This has already been addressed, but you're not really paying attention.
So the metric the government uses to determine free lunch is poor and they are purposefully denying kids free lunch that need free lunch? Also, no school we deny kids a lunch if they don't have the money.
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,084
- 2,449
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
Well look who's lying now.
Mother says daughter denied school lunch because she was short by 15 cents
When the student didn't have the money to pay the difference, the cashier allegedly threw the food away
www.cbsnews.com
SFSD to deny food to students with negative account balance
District's child nutrition chief and two Sioux Falls state lawmakers feel all kids should get a free meal at school
www.dakotanewsnow.com
Outraged mother's post goes viral after school denies lunch to sons
An outraged parent's social media post has gone viral after her two young sons were denied lunch entrees in their school's cafeteria due to an unpaid bill of $24.
abc7chicago.com
While MOST schools wouldn't deny a child food when they can't pay, and would just keep track of their meal debt, there are schools and school districts which do outright deny children food if they aren't able to pay, or if their meal debt is deemed to be too high.
...and no one was surprised.
Have they though? Imagine you're the sort of person who actually believes that the courts are being weaponized against Trump as a political attack (and that's why all it's all going on in an election year). Biden's son getting hit with a charge that doesn't implicate Biden in anything at all and that he will likely get a slap on the wrist for (rehab and probation, maybe a year or two at a min-security at the very worst) feels like the kind of thing you'd let happen to give the appearance that the courts aren't being used as a political attack even if they are because it's something that is going to have little to no political impact.
It's kinda ironic that the thing Hunter Biden got convicted of is something many of the Republicans going on about it don't think should be a crime though.
I mean, I suppose they could threaten him with the full 25 years (which is essentially a life sentence for someone in their 50s) if he doesn't turn on his father, presuming there was anything to turn on his father about. We threaten people with harsher prosecution if they don't turn on their allies/conspirators all the time. It's no more persecution than pressuring people to turn on Trump on threat of harsher prosecution.
The italicized bit is doing a lot of heavy lifting, mind you.
Up to 25 years, but Hunter is in his 50s, so it's functionally the same thing. Besides, sentencing guidelines are optional, a lot of discretion is given to the judge. That's why there was that minor scandal involving Justice Jackson because she had a habit of looking at the guidelines, what the prosecution asked for, what the defense asked for and often handing out sentences lower than all of the above, notably in several cases involving pedophiles.
It's not that I disagree lots of that sort of person are out there, but they are voting for Trump come hell or high water. But there are others.
US elections are probably decided by only around 20% of the electorate who might reasonable shift allegiance (in a handful of states) - the other 80% were locked in before the campaigning even started. Every percent counts, and it potentially only needs 1-2% of the electorate to think "Dude, your case makes no sense" and that candidate has just gone from winner to loser.
I'm sure that happens time to time but it's a rarity. The ABC7 Chicago article states "Nutrition Services staff apologized to the parent as soon as they became aware of the situation. The employee who was working the lunch line has been provided training to make sure that this doesn't happen again. It is not our policy to ever deny a child lunch, even if their account is temporarily outstanding."Well look who's lying now.
Mother says daughter denied school lunch because she was short by 15 cents
When the student didn't have the money to pay the difference, the cashier allegedly threw the food away
SFSD to deny food to students with negative account balance
District's child nutrition chief and two Sioux Falls state lawmakers feel all kids should get a free meal at school
Outraged mother's post goes viral after school denies lunch to sons
An outraged parent's social media post has gone viral after her two young sons were denied lunch entrees in their school's cafeteria due to an unpaid bill of $24.
While MOST schools wouldn't deny a child food when they can't pay, and would just keep track of their meal debt, there are schools and school districts which do outright deny children food if they aren't able to pay, or if their meal debt is deemed to be too high.
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,084
- 2,449
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
And that doesn't matter, you clearly claimed that it never happened, therefore you are a liar.
Also, if you read the second article you'll see a DISTRICT WIDE policy in South Dakota where kids are being denied food.
Last edited:
Just gotta point out that Musk deems himself needy so he can get government contracts that props up most of his companies. A LOT of companies do this
The dumbest thing Richard Dawkins has said is that he is a Cultural Christian
Freedom of Religion, democracy, Freedom of Speech etc has nothing to do with being a Christian. It was FORDCED onto Christianity (and all other religions) so they would stop killing people.
It's certainly inexhaustive. Nobody in their right mind would argue that noone outside of those on <130% of poverty-level income are "needy"; certainly the government did not argue that. You're the only one who seems to want to, since that's the strange approach you've chosen to argue this case on.
Lol, yes they will.
It promotes the idea that he's an evil wizard using arcane technologies to hold on to power.
If he was I'd suggest he use another spell or ritual because the one he's currently using ain't doing jack shit.
Someone inflicted this on me, so I will inflict this on you.
Historically, every atheist culture immediately loses all of these things and starts killing lots of people. Cultural Revolution and all that.
Are you talking about atheism as a publicly set policy, i.e. something tacitly and/or explicitly enforced, or an atheism borne from a society that is employing freedom of religion which, as things turn out, lead to a majority of society rejecting religion?
How does one get so stupid...
Someone inflicted this on me, so I will inflict this on you.
From the article that you failed to mention, "Every K-12 student that does not receive free or reduced meals has a 'food account' with the district." Needy kids do not have a food account so they will not be denied food.
I still don't have any evidence of needy kids not getting food because of doing away with pandemic era policy.