Don't people that are trying to make something a thing/trend post what they do on social media? Why would they do that in public if they find it embarrassing?So you've gone from
to
If you don't use social media then why is your criteria for whether or not something is real whether or not it was mentioned on Republican social media?
And like I said, why would Republicans post about something on their social media if it's actively embarrassing to them? Again, did they proudly post about how they were wearing diapers for Trump?
How do you know they didn't if you don't follow social media?Don't people that are trying to make something a thing/trend post what they do on social media? Why would they do that in public if they find it embarrassing?
If someone claims to have been anal probed on an alien spaceship, and have photos where they are being probed, and the photos are confirmed to not be manipulated, and are confirmed to have come from an alien space ship then yes, I will believe that person got probed on an alien space ship, even if that person went to the space ship themselves and asked to be probed.Again, if someone claims to have been anal probed on an alien spaceship, don't you require actual evidence for that to be a thing you think happened?
It's not just that. She's been much less visible than Trump (who has been president and dominated the news cycles for years), and a substantial number of voters may have been waiting to see what she was made of. Thus she potentially benefits from just being seen and assuaging concerns about an unknown as well as outperforming Trump. Of course, the outcome for long-term of voting intentions could still be almost nil.Well, he doubled down on the most extreme and inflammatory lies (immigrants are eating the dogs and cats in Springfield, and Dems will execute babies after they're born). But at this point, his voters either know he'll tell inflammatory lies and are fine with it, or will believe whatever idiotic shit he says regardless of truth.
Harris was more coherent, more able to stay on-topic, more calm and "presidential", and there seems to be consensus she came across better-- even from the Fox poll.
He'll say the questions were unfair, he'll say the moderators were crooked, he'll say anything to avoid facing up to his own poor performance.I can only imagine how upset and furious Trump is going to be reading the feedback.
Snopes said they originated from a single Twitter account.How do you know they didn't if you don't follow social media?
If someone claims to have been anal probed on an alien spaceship, and have photos where they are being probed, and the photos are confirmed to not be manipulated, and are confirmed to have come from an alien space ship then yes, I will believe that person got probed on an alien space ship, even if that person went to the space ship themselves and asked to be probed.
He already has...He'll say the questions were unfair, he'll say the moderators were crooked, he'll say anything to avoid facing up to his own poor performance.
Yeah, I know. You are using the widest possible usage of hoax. AND you pretended that Dems only did itWhen someone says XYZ group of people is doing ABC and there's no evidence of that, that's literally a hoax by the definition of the word.
Peterson has about as much compassion for these men as fucking Andrew Tate has. Which is to say, no, no he does not. They're just a gullible crowd for him to exploit and squeeze money from. It's manosphere bullshit; an ecosystem in which he has set himself up in nicely, and an extension of his already homophobic, transphobic, sexist, and covid-conspiratorial views.I’m aware JP has questionable views on some things but can’t say this is one of them. Not sure how showing some compassion for people he once called “useless men” himself is a bad thing. Yes I’m aware of how vicious these people can apparently sound on message boards and I guess one of them even drove a van into a bunch of people killing them, but OTOH, they didn’t turn out this way on their own. Our fucked up society played a big part in that, like any other social injustice.
So these people just need to *pull up their bootstraps*, ie no external factors in their lives are playing a part there? Or *who gives a fuck* because they’re men, or maybe by extension they’re clearly full of shit? Idk…reading some of the comments it doesn’t seem so black and white. The cynical attitude prevalent in the U.S. is part of what exacerbates peoples’ emotional/mental health and social issues.Peterson has about as much compassion for these men as fucking Andrew Tate has. Which is to say, no, no he does not. They're just a gullible crowd for him to exploit and squeeze money from. It's manosphere bullshit; an ecosystem in which he has set himself up in nicely, and an extension of his already homophobic, transphobic, sexist, and covid-conspiratorial views.
If your first instinct when being a lonely man who can't get a woman is to blame women and feminism, then you're doing it wrong, and you need to be told you're doing it wrong. What you don't, REALLY DON'T need is someone supporting those thoughts.
Their problems aren't fake, but these men tend to blame their problems and direct their anger at the wrong target.So these people just need to *pull up their bootstraps*, ie no external factors in their lives are playing a part there? Or *who gives a fuck* because they’re men, or maybe by extension they’re clearly full of shit? Idk…reading some of the comments it doesn’t seem so black and white. The cynical attitude prevalent in the U.S. is part of what exacerbates peoples’ emotional/mental health and social issues.