yourbeliefs said:
This list is about as valid as Yahoo's top 10 games list. Here's some of the numerous things I see wrong with this collection:
NO fighting games. Really? Not even Street Fighter II or the series?
NO GTA games. The massive impact these games had on the industry cannot be ignored.
Diablo games ranked #2. Really? There's only been 2 of these games and from what I played, they weren't exactly innovative or industry changing.
Deep Space. The idea that this would be up there but NOT put on the Resident Evil series (or even Alone in the Dark for that matter) is ludicrous.
I feel like these developers were trying to be "too cool" for this list, so they didn't pick games that they thought were actually the most FUN and instead picked stuff that was most "meaningful" and artistic. They went for the "hip" factor as opposed to the "truth" factor. Either that or it seems to be that most developers are tossers.
No. What happened was that you completely misunderstood what the list was about.
The list wasn't about which games had the biggest impact. The list was which game series they LIKED the most.
Diablo, for example, while still more innovative than what you give it credit for, is on the list because at the time the two games were just some of the most fun you could have gaming. It was well executed, addictive, had one of the more competent multi-player system in an age where multi-player was often a hassle to get working. Even in this age, other games who tried to replicate it's formula (Titan Quest, which i play myself, and Torchlight) just hasn't managed to have the same appeal.
I'm very surprised myself that Half-Life isn't on the list, but I'm not surprised at all about Baldur's Gate being on the top. The games in the series, even by todays standards, are still well executed, looks good, has a very competent combat system with a really good difficulty curve, and above all else tons of content (with even more available through fan-made mods).