I was under the impression "In my own opinion" meant: "This is my opinion, therefore it is not gospel truth. Feel free to agree, or disagree as you see fit."BloatedGuppy said:I realize you threw in "IMO" which is universal short hand for "you cannot criticize or rebut this", but it's just an absurd criticism. The books are no less plot dense or short of set pieces than the preceding volumes.
I know you established with your sniffy hand wave that they're average books at best, so possibly you just don't consider ANYTHING he writes to be worth reading, but "I don't like it, ergo it sucks" is not a compelling foundation for an argument.
And the thing is, I do consider Martin's work to be reading, there's a rich world and wonderful characters in the series. It's just that when it comes to that actual words on page, it's just not that good.
Anyway, I probably should have said "nothing of importance happens in 'A Feast for Crows'." All of Cersei's actions result in nothing but failure, hell, practically anyone who deals in backroom politics will fail in this book. If they do nothing but fail, is anything achieved?
And all the stuff you mentioned about Jon, Dany and Tyrion happened in "A Dance With Dragons", not "A Feast for Crows". Which is why I said that nothing happens in "A Feast for Crows" since most of that good stuff happens in the book that is released six years after.