Frank_Sinatra_ said:
Dr.Liberman said:
When the Columbine murders took place, there were national polls where people voted on what they believed caused the two young men to kill. Media violence ranked high on the list
Huh... Apparently to her a "national poll" counts as a "study."
ROIGHT! Well then I'm going to have a "national poll" over the cuteness of bunnies and then call it a study!
I R DOKTOR NAO.
Furthermore, if you read the actual studies that are posted in defense, the studies themselves have to do with the effect that violent video games have on an individual who already has a diagnosis of mental illness. "Men with high levels of psychoticism also tend to express greater levels of rape proclivity after repeated exposure to violent and nonviolent pornography" (Markey et al, Vulnerability to Violent Video Games: A Review and Integration of Personality Research). Oh wait there's more! At the conclusion Patrick Markey and Charlotte Markey go on to say,
"However, more recent research suggests that the notion that all, or even most, individuals who play VVGs will inevitably become aggressive may be unwarranted. Instead, it appears that it is crucial to consider various personality traits of the person playing the VVG when predicting whether or not the VVG will have adverse effects."
It's pretty obvious here that Carol Lieberman is grasping at straws in an attempt to keep her job. It is completely non professional to use a study in order to draw a conclusion that is no where to be found within that study. The first document is not a study at all, rather a prematurely drawn manifesto for the cause that she is representing herself in and reads like the ten commandments with footnotes.
These documents do not support her claims. You could go in there with a fine toothed comb and find that they will never support her claim. She has used her profession to misinform the general public and her license should be revoked.