All I did was add MY input into a thread called "Games YOU have given up on and why?". I also thought it polite to retort to your suggestion that i lack the skill enough to finish YET ANOTHER crappy post apocalyptic set game. You know, maybe thats why Mass Effect is so good, because its set in a future where half the population of earth IS NOT part of the thing you call the floor that you are walking on now, and the other half, a mutated mess of ever spawning enemies.Limzz said:Sorry. I didn't realize your top 20 list was what determined the quality of games for everyone...mushupork3mpire said:Perhaps. Though i thought it could have had something to do with me putting all the points into heavy weapons, stealing and stealth; and the fact that the stealth never worked and the only heavy weapon i ever used was a miniature nuke launcher (probably a one hit kill anyway).Limzz said:Isn't your hate of Fallout 3 based more on lack of skill than the quality of the game? Interestingly enough I just made a thread describing how the game was too easy.mushupork3mpire said:Fallout 3 - perhaps if walking 5 minutes across the ruin of DC without getting my knob bitten off by a mutant crab-man-thing or being incinerated by something 4 times the size of me in every proportion then i wouldnt have walked away. Though how glad am i that i did, because afterwards i picked up Mass Effect, completed it in ten days and it now holds the number eight spot on my top 20 games of all time list.
So in a way, i'm kinda glad that Fallout 3 was crap on chips because i would never have discovered Mass Effect had it not been.
if it is down to my lack of skill then yes i'll admit that, but the fact of the matter is Mass Effect is so much better than fallout, which is why Mass Effect is in my top 20 list and fallout 3 is somewhere near the bottom, brushing shoulders with 50 Cent : Blood on the sand.
Which is funny to me, because in my universe, both games rank almost next to each other in their respective amounts of pure, awesome, win. (which puts them probably somewhere in the top 5-7)mushupork3mpire said:if it is down to my lack of skill then yes i'll admit that, but the fact of the matter is Mass Effect is so much better than fallout, which is why Mass Effect is in my top 20 list and fallout 3 is somewhere near the bottom, brushing shoulders with 50 Cent : Blood on the sand.
I had the same problems. I even went out to buy a controller for it so that I could drive in the game and play other ports. For some reason, I can't map it to something that feels natural. I still haven't finished it and I got it when it was brand spanking new.archvile93 said:Too bad that ran even shitier on PC. God this thing can run Cysis on max settings and always stay beyon 60fps. Saints Row 2 I couldn't even get above 30. That's why I gave up on it. What a waste of fifty bucks.
hmm never fancied the Jak titles, i usually stuck to my crime shooters & sandbox but recently i've been an easy target for RPG developers BioWare in particular since Mass Effect left me stunned, and i'm currently eyeing up ME 2 and pre-TV era DragonAge Origins. And subsequently all the associated expansion packs once my live is renewed.unoleian said:Which is funny to me, because in my universe, both games rank almost next to each other in their respective amounts of pure, awesome, win. (which puts them probably somewhere in the top 5-7)mushupork3mpire said:if it is down to my lack of skill then yes i'll admit that, but the fact of the matter is Mass Effect is so much better than fallout, which is why Mass Effect is in my top 20 list and fallout 3 is somewhere near the bottom, brushing shoulders with 50 Cent : Blood on the sand.
But OT...
Have to go with Jak and Daxter 2, myself. First game was a super-awesome platformer with style and class. The second somehow became a cartoony GTA clone with "attitude" and a learning curve that looked less like a curve and more like a cliff. Stopped playing it at about a point where I was expected to dodge/kill about 5 gazillion bad guys while running up this massively complicated maze of docks, and had to redo it about 20 times before I almost smashed the controller. Sold it an hour later, and never looked back.
Wow I had the same problem. I remember that spot so vividly it sucked so hard too. Got rid of the game without a second though.unoleian said:Which is funny to me, because in my universe, both games rank almost next to each other in their respective amounts of pure, awesome, win. (which puts them probably somewhere in the top 5-7)mushupork3mpire said:if it is down to my lack of skill then yes i'll admit that, but the fact of the matter is Mass Effect is so much better than fallout, which is why Mass Effect is in my top 20 list and fallout 3 is somewhere near the bottom, brushing shoulders with 50 Cent : Blood on the sand.
But OT...
Have to go with Jak and Daxter 2, myself. First game was a super-awesome platformer with style and class. The second somehow became a cartoony GTA clone with "attitude" and a learning curve that looked less like a curve and more like a cliff. Stopped playing it at about a point where I was expected to dodge/kill about 5 gazillion bad guys while running up this massively complicated maze of docks, and had to redo it about 20 times before I almost smashed the controller. Sold it an hour later, and never looked back.
aha. yeah my brother had this game. i think this was the first game i ever picked up the controller, only to put it riight back down 5 enraged, epileptic minutes later.Misterian said:F-Zero GX.
If you know how needlessly hard this game is, I think you know why.