Meh, they can do it all they like. It is more like taking a stance against stupid than an actual political stance to be honest. And besides, they WANT controversy, it is amazing for them when they pull support of a good stance and manage to get people talking about it at the same time. They gain so much more than they lose Besides, the oil companies in 'Merica already have a party dedicated to them, why not start the Kraft party?Xan Krieger said:I think companies need to stop taking political stances like this, all it does is causes controversy. Kraft is a food company, not a political party. Starbucks made the same mistake.
Honestly, at this point in time this should not need to be a political opinion, supporting equal rights should never stir controversy regardless of the source. The opinion is basically: "These people should get the same rights and privileges that everyone else does". That shouldn't be a political statement in this day an age. Besides, if there is something happening to create progress in society, I don't care what it is.Helmholtz Watson said:Can't say I agree with a food company having a political opinion other that reassuring people that they don't use slave labor or ingredients that are obtained through illegal measures.
You support gay rights, great. I still stand by my comment, I don't like food companies making political opinions. I've very much in favor of stem cell research, but that doesn't mean that I want Domino's pizza to start voicing their support for the research.Brandon237 said:Honestly, at this point in time this should not need to be a political opinion, supporting equal rights should never stir controversy regardless of the source. The opinion is basically: "These people should get the same rights and privileges that everyone else does". That shouldn't be a political statement in this day an age. Besides, if there is something happening to create progress in society, I don't care what it is.Helmholtz Watson said:Can't say I agree with a food company having a political opinion other that reassuring people that they don't use slave labor or ingredients that are obtained through illegal measures.
Seeing as your not the Pope, you don't get to make that call.Tanis said:Yeah, but it's PART OF THEIR BOOK.SpectacularWebHead said:Dude, I'm an atheist, but it doesn't help us when you say stuff like that. Sure, THESE christian people are using religion to justify atrocity, but that does not mean that all religous people do. There are LGBT christians too, the actions of the few do not define the actions of the many, and by putting them all together in the same way doesn't make anyone willing to listen to you.
It's 'the word of god'.
Try as they might, 'good Christians' are going AGAINST god when they don't stone to death that jerk-off neighbor who worked on The Sabbath.
Being an LGBT Christian just means you're illiterate.
What call? It's what the book says. If your god is unfailable, and it's what the Bible says, then you believe everything in it. If you're picking and choosing then you're admitting God is wrong, just too deep in denial to admit it. They're using parts they agree with to justify their bigotry, but ignoring everything else. Fuck that they're Christians, that's just being hypocritical. Which is bad.Helmholtz Watson said:Seeing as your not the Pope, you don't get to make that call.Tanis said:Yeah, but it's PART OF THEIR BOOK.SpectacularWebHead said:Dude, I'm an atheist, but it doesn't help us when you say stuff like that. Sure, THESE christian people are using religion to justify atrocity, but that does not mean that all religous people do. There are LGBT christians too, the actions of the few do not define the actions of the many, and by putting them all together in the same way doesn't make anyone willing to listen to you.
It's 'the word of god'.
Try as they might, 'good Christians' are going AGAINST god when they don't stone to death that jerk-off neighbor who worked on The Sabbath.
Being an LGBT Christian just means you're illiterate.
Thats a false dichotomy, the option isn't that you take every thing from the bible or your not a Christian.Roman Monaghan said:What call? It's what the book says. If your god is unfailable, and it's what the Bible says, then you believe everything in it. If you're picking and choosing then you're admitting God is wrong, just too deep in denial to admit it. They're using parts they agree with to justify their bigotry, but ignoring everything else. Fuck that they're Christians, that's just being hypocritical. Which is bad.
But why? The food tastes the same, the prices stay the same, everything about the food is the same. So what's the big deal?Helmholtz Watson said:You support gay rights, great. I still stand by my comment, I don't like food companies making political opinions. I've very much in favor of stem cell research, but that doesn't mean that I want Domino's pizza to start voicing their support for the research.Brandon237 said:Honestly, at this point in time this should not need to be a political opinion, supporting equal rights should never stir controversy regardless of the source. The opinion is basically: "These people should get the same rights and privileges that everyone else does". That shouldn't be a political statement in this day an age. Besides, if there is something happening to create progress in society, I don't care what it is.Helmholtz Watson said:Can't say I agree with a food company having a political opinion other that reassuring people that they don't use slave labor or ingredients that are obtained through illegal measures.
Not sure what being a cross dressing ex-nazi has to do with anything...Helmholtz Watson said:Seeing as your not the Pope, you don't get to make that call.
Hey, if the shoe fits, buy the socks.LunaSocks said:
What Sweden lacks in Oreo, they make up for in awesome.Dascylus said:I don't understand the hating gay thing...
I mean, what is wrong with being gay? I mean I hate some things but there is a clear demonstration with every time those people affect my life (the impossibly stupid and/or inconsiderate).
So, the bible says no gays (according to some) but as long as someone is not gay And a member of the homophobic church (some churches are more tolerant than others) in question I see no conflict.
"Ah, but think of the children"
Ok, so you can raise them in a bubble of denying homosexuality in society and watch the culture shock and maladjustment or let them grow in a free society and form their own opinions. That is your choice as a parent but don't deny another their choices in the process.
And to finish, Sweden doesn't readily have oreos available everywhere and they aren't cheap but it is definitely worth the trip to grab a box.
But sometimes you can see a rainbow and sky together, probably feeling each other up. Obviously the sky is pro-gay. That should be the next boycott. No sky for my family!Phasmal said:Also, I have it on good authority that the sky is blue.
My aunt is a Baptist minister...she also happens to be a lesbian. I was raised Christian, but in a church (not my aunt's) that taught CRAZY things like TOLLERANCE. The Bible is filled with contradictions, mostly becuase it was written by a lot of different people, then changed to fit the times and whatever agenda said church had. From the old to the new testamant you'd think God was a totally different guy...he went from the strict always angry dad full of hellfire, brimstone and punishment for every little thing to the doting grandfather who's cool "as long as you say you're sorry and treat each other well" (Somehow that last part gets overlooked all too often). It's not about admitting that god is wrong, it's saying that god, like everyone else, changes and evolves. There are LOTS of different interpretations of the Bible, it's why there are so many denominations, but I've always gravitated to the ones that emphasized treating each other with kindness and respect, and that includes our LGBT friends and neighbors.Roman Monaghan said:What call? It's what the book says. If your god is unfailable, and it's what the Bible says, then you believe everything in it. If you're picking and choosing then you're admitting God is wrong, just too deep in denial to admit it. They're using parts they agree with to justify their bigotry, but ignoring everything else. Fuck that they're Christians, that's just being hypocritical. Which is bad.Helmholtz Watson said:Seeing as your not the Pope, you don't get to make that call.Tanis said:Yeah, but it's PART OF THEIR BOOK.SpectacularWebHead said:Dude, I'm an atheist, but it doesn't help us when you say stuff like that. Sure, THESE christian people are using religion to justify atrocity, but that does not mean that all religous people do. There are LGBT christians too, the actions of the few do not define the actions of the many, and by putting them all together in the same way doesn't make anyone willing to listen to you.
It's 'the word of god'.
Try as they might, 'good Christians' are going AGAINST god when they don't stone to death that jerk-off neighbor who worked on The Sabbath.
Being an LGBT Christian just means you're illiterate.
Actually I'm pretty sure it is. If you believe God is perfect, but don't believe everything that's said in his little instruction guide, then yeah, not Christian. Just in denial. And you're right, it IS a false dichotomy. Yet another reason ontop of the other ninety-billion of why Christianity and most other religions are stupid.Helmholtz Watson said:Thats a false dichotomy, the option isn't that you take every thing from the bible or your not a Christian.Roman Monaghan said:What call? It's what the book says. If your god is unfailable, and it's what the Bible says, then you believe everything in it. If you're picking and choosing then you're admitting God is wrong, just too deep in denial to admit it. They're using parts they agree with to justify their bigotry, but ignoring everything else. Fuck that they're Christians, that's just being hypocritical. Which is bad.