I guess we're talking about slightly different things then. I'm not for restricting offensive speech. People can be offended for all sorts of reasons; I don't care that much. I'm for restricting speech which promotes discrimination or denigrates a particular group.redFaction post=7.72320.761886 said:In case anything suggested I was a Christian or even religious, I'm not. Christianity isn't about one single individual's relation to God, but about humanity's relation to God. And with that in mind, a Christian would be offended since any reference to God would be to the one and only God of Abraham (I don't really get it either, but I don't need to).
My point was whether or not we should remove certain words from daily usage just because certain groups are offended by them. And if we are, then there shouldn't be exceptions.
By saying that Christians shouldn't be offended by someone else using their Lord's name in vain is a cop out argument that doesn't address the double standard that is present.
"Oh my god" may offend a group of people, but it does not denigrate their way of life. Using a colloquial term for female genitalia to indicate that someone is weak? Using any of a variety of nationality or race-inspired slurs to refer to someone in a negative light? Using the term "gay" as a synonym for "bad"? These things cause damage. This is my point.
P.S. Outside/irrespective of my point, I think it is inane for someone to be offended by me breaking the commandments. If they want to pity me for my eternal punishment, fine. I didn't break their law. I broke their deity's law. That's between Her and me. They should thank me for making their adherence to the laws meaningful.