Sounds like the future of the franchise is an RTS spin-off!Tom Goldman said:the stereotypical female might have a stable of beefcakes do her fighting for her, until they all get wiped out and she has to step in to take care of business.
I imagine that a forum is like a river from which we all drink. You can take a small sip or a gulp, however you like it. You don't need to ask for permission to drink more deeply (even if some others may look at you funny).AquaAscension said:I think this would actually create a very interesting double standard to arise. One which, I think is not talked about at all. Or not much anyway.
Were there to exist this "stereotypical female character" in a game, I have a feeling that this character (Daisy Nukem, let's say) would immediately come under fire from feminists/women's rights groups saying that it is an offensive stereotype of women everywhere because not all women act like this/believe this/would take this action etc. Now let's take a step back.
Why, then, are not more male groups offended by this game's interpretation of the stereotypical masculine man? This is a double standard and an interesting one. This game, I think at least, is not offensive towards women because it is a character sketch (allbeit a very charicatured one). Should it be considered offensive towards men who don't fit this hyper form of masculinity? Would a game featuring a "stereotyped" female character cause a ruckus? Should this game cause questions to be asked concerning what we value in men in society? Is this all reading way too far in to be relevant?
I don't really know the answer to these questions, but I think the only way that games will ever achieve even a modicum of relevance and respect in this society is if they can be used to ask these difficult questions - if they can use their characters, environments, etc. to foster discussion rather than falling back on the old, tired excuse of "it's just a game." While this statement might be true, it only serves to undercut any legitimacy a game can make in society.
*snerks at the thought of a cooking mama style duke nukem*Ultratwinkie said:No, cooking mama is.cainx10a said:Ain't Bayonetta the female Duke Nukem?
I agree with you 100%. The sick part, it's not like Duke is in fact a proper portrayal of men either. I've been around lots of steroid pumped gym heads who are tame compared to Duke. I love the world we live in. My girlfriend is a fine example of a great woman who isn't what the media makes women out to be like. She thinks Capture the Babe his hilarious.Harbinger_ said:I think that Gearbox is on to something. The problem is if anyone complained they'd say that she isn't being protrayed as a proper woman and is showing negative protrayals of women.
...So it's not sexist because, in the end, he whisks the women off their feet from horseback and rides into the sunset?Tom Goldman said:"He is ego-centric and everything in his world revolves around him," he continued. "And women can offer him something different than men can. So if, to Duke, women are less than him, it's not because they're women, it's just because they're not him."
Pitchford points out how Duke actually puts himself "at great risk" to make sure women are safe, which is the premise of Duke Nukem Forever.