You wouldn't buy a copy of Sixth Sense that showed Bruce Willis being transparent though. I acknowledge it's a well known trope, but actually advertising the "shock" ending seems to ruin the point of the advert.Casual Shinji said:That's like complaining about having the chestbuster scene spoiled in Alien, or knowing before hand that Arnie is actually the good guy in Terminator 2. Some movies spoilers have become part of popculture and there's no way in hell to avoid them so we might as well embrace them.
Equally, I'd really prefer it if they never showed that. It's just far too great a mystery to have a REAL answer. (See Marcel Wallace's briefcase)OT: This could be interesting if they would actually show the rise of the apes from the apes' perspective. Fat change of that happing though. And why does it have to be science which created the apes? I always figured it was "simple" evolution that made the apes top dog.
Not knowing the ending to Planet of the Apes is the same as not knowing the ending of King Kong. Or The Passion. Have you seen that movie yet? JESUS DIES!The_root_of_all_evil said:I have a real problem with their marketing of the old movies...Korten12 said:Looks interesting, need to watch the old movies.
Dude, you've just given away the MAIN SPOILER ENDING on the cover! You planks.
JESUS DIES AT THE END OF KING KONG????The Human Torch said:Not knowing the ending to Planet of the Apes is the same as not knowing the ending of King Kong. Or The Passion. Have you seen that movie yet? JESUS DIES!
From what I remember of the the original movies, yeah. Caesar is born in the present to apes from the future, a plague wipes out all all domesticated pets, humans get the idea to domesticate apes to replace them (probably using Caesar as a template), apes become highly intelligent as a result of the domestication process, apes become ubiquitously used as slave labor instead (a la the Cylons from the re-imagined BSG franchise), Caesar leads the apes to revolt.theonlyblaze2 said:No Charlton Heston=No Apes
That is the law.
EDIT: Also, didn't the reason for the smart apes have something to do with a plague that killed all the cats and dogs?
That was how the remake explained things, not the original films.ReiverCorrupter said:Yeah. Just wait until we start making breakthroughs in genetic engineering. You'll be seeing one of these movies every week.Togs said:More "SCIENCE IS BAD" BS, a definate miss on this noe
OT: I thought that the canon said that it was the space station that crashed through the time nebula and then the apes broke loose. I guess they're starting from scratch.
I know. What made Planet of the Apes so interesting is not how it happend, but that it happend.The_root_of_all_evil said:Equally, I'd really prefer it if they never showed that. It's just far too great a mystery to have a REAL answer. (See Marcel Wallace's briefcase)Casual Shinji said:OT: This could be interesting if they would actually show the rise of the apes from the apes' perspective. Fat change of that happing though. And why does it have to be science which created the apes? I always figured it was "simple" evolution that made the apes top dog.
Yeah, so this is the re-imagining of a re-imagining. That no one wanted.jjafargi said:That was how the remake explained things, not the original films.ReiverCorrupter said:Yeah. Just wait until we start making breakthroughs in genetic engineering. You'll be seeing one of these movies every week.Togs said:More "SCIENCE IS BAD" BS, a definate miss on this noe
OT: I thought that the canon said that it was the space station that crashed through the time nebula and then the apes broke loose. I guess they're starting from scratch.
I take it you weren't a fan of Hannibal Rising either... That's exactly what the world needed, a Hannibal movie that didn't have Anthony Hopkins.Casual Shinji said:I know. What made Planet of the Apes so interesting is not how it happend, but that it happend.The_root_of_all_evil said:Equally, I'd really prefer it if they never showed that. It's just far too great a mystery to have a REAL answer. (See Marcel Wallace's briefcase)Casual Shinji said:OT: This could be interesting if they would actually show the rise of the apes from the apes' perspective. Fat change of that happing though. And why does it have to be science which created the apes? I always figured it was "simple" evolution that made the apes top dog.
I've never been a fan of prequels that uncover the mystery behind the lore of a classic movie. I don't need to know how Leatherface became who he is, just as I don't need to see how the machines rose to power in Terminator. Letting the mystery of that stew in the minds of the audience is much more effective... Though, not as profitable.
Giant Gorilla Jesus died so that you can eat bananas.The_root_of_all_evil said:JESUS DIES AT THE END OF KING KONG????The Human Torch said:Not knowing the ending to Planet of the Apes is the same as not knowing the ending of King Kong. Or The Passion. Have you seen that movie yet? JESUS DIES!
Damn, now I have to watch that.
Argh, ninja strikes! Glad I wasn't the only one that saw the symmetry, though.Scarim Coral said:Do they really need "Planet of the"? It work a lot better as "Rise of the apes". Also the plot sound quite fishy. The plot is similar to that shark film "Deep Blue Sea" since it involve injecting a animal with come chemicals which result in a cure in some way but the side effect is giving it super intelligence and also killing people. How cheeky of them to steal that plot.