Genius Apes Swarm the Streets in Trailer for Planet of the Apes Prequel

lauph1tup

New member
Nov 21, 2009
5
0
0
didn't they already establish that it was a time loop in the third planet of the apes movies, unless this is a prequel to the 2001 remake.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
That's like complaining about having the chestbuster scene spoiled in Alien, or knowing before hand that Arnie is actually the good guy in Terminator 2. Some movies spoilers have become part of popculture and there's no way in hell to avoid them so we might as well embrace them.
You wouldn't buy a copy of Sixth Sense that showed Bruce Willis being transparent though. I acknowledge it's a well known trope, but actually advertising the "shock" ending seems to ruin the point of the advert.
OT: This could be interesting if they would actually show the rise of the apes from the apes' perspective. Fat change of that happing though. And why does it have to be science which created the apes? I always figured it was "simple" evolution that made the apes top dog.
Equally, I'd really prefer it if they never showed that. It's just far too great a mystery to have a REAL answer. (See Marcel Wallace's briefcase)
 

Rocketboy13

New member
Oct 21, 2008
149
0
0
There are only a couple thousand gorillas in the world, and there are only a few thousand left of each of the great apes, and being smart doesn't make someone capable of treating someone with advanced medical procedures, flying a plane, or using weapons skillfully. This is a stupid premise to think that at the height of civilization humans could be brought down by this.

Let me put it this way: There are more people in the United States with hunting licensees than there are apes on Earth. The only reason those people haven't wiped out wildlife for the purposes of sport is law, there ain't no law against wiping out killer apes.
 

HK_01

New member
Jun 1, 2009
1,610
0
0
How on earth would the apes overthrow humanity in the scenario they seem to be going for? That makes no sense. They might have been made as smart as or even smarter than humans, but we have centuries and billions upon billions of man-hours worth of technological accomplishments and sheer numbers on our side. It's like an army of stone-age tribesmen (on steroids) going up against modern human society. They wouldn't stand a chance.
 

The Human Torch

New member
Sep 12, 2010
750
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Korten12 said:
Looks interesting, need to watch the old movies.
I have a real problem with their marketing of the old movies...



Dude, you've just given away the MAIN SPOILER ENDING on the cover! You planks.
Not knowing the ending to Planet of the Apes is the same as not knowing the ending of King Kong. Or The Passion. Have you seen that movie yet? JESUS DIES!
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
The Human Torch said:
Not knowing the ending to Planet of the Apes is the same as not knowing the ending of King Kong. Or The Passion. Have you seen that movie yet? JESUS DIES!
JESUS DIES AT THE END OF KING KONG????

Damn, now I have to watch that. ;)
 

jjafargi

New member
Apr 2, 2010
7
0
0
theonlyblaze2 said:
No Charlton Heston=No Apes
That is the law.

EDIT: Also, didn't the reason for the smart apes have something to do with a plague that killed all the cats and dogs?
From what I remember of the the original movies, yeah. Caesar is born in the present to apes from the future, a plague wipes out all all domesticated pets, humans get the idea to domesticate apes to replace them (probably using Caesar as a template), apes become highly intelligent as a result of the domestication process, apes become ubiquitously used as slave labor instead (a la the Cylons from the re-imagined BSG franchise), Caesar leads the apes to revolt.
 

jjafargi

New member
Apr 2, 2010
7
0
0
ReiverCorrupter said:
Togs said:
More "SCIENCE IS BAD" BS, a definate miss on this noe
Yeah. Just wait until we start making breakthroughs in genetic engineering. You'll be seeing one of these movies every week.

OT: I thought that the canon said that it was the space station that crashed through the time nebula and then the apes broke loose. I guess they're starting from scratch.
That was how the remake explained things, not the original films.
 

messy

New member
Dec 3, 2008
2,057
0
0
I must say, I still think bullets would've solved this problem pretty quickly.

"Something's were never meant to be changed"
"***** please, this is science"

But yeah, science is evil...again.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,162
4,929
118
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Casual Shinji said:
OT: This could be interesting if they would actually show the rise of the apes from the apes' perspective. Fat change of that happing though. And why does it have to be science which created the apes? I always figured it was "simple" evolution that made the apes top dog.
Equally, I'd really prefer it if they never showed that. It's just far too great a mystery to have a REAL answer. (See Marcel Wallace's briefcase)
I know. What made Planet of the Apes so interesting is not how it happend, but that it happend.

I've never been a fan of prequels that uncover the mystery behind the lore of a classic movie. I don't need to know how Leatherface became who he is, just as I don't need to see how the machines rose to power in Terminator. Letting the mystery of that stew in the minds of the audience is much more effective... Though, not as profitable.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
jjafargi said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
Togs said:
More "SCIENCE IS BAD" BS, a definate miss on this noe
Yeah. Just wait until we start making breakthroughs in genetic engineering. You'll be seeing one of these movies every week.

OT: I thought that the canon said that it was the space station that crashed through the time nebula and then the apes broke loose. I guess they're starting from scratch.
That was how the remake explained things, not the original films.
Yeah, so this is the re-imagining of a re-imagining. That no one wanted.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Casual Shinji said:
OT: This could be interesting if they would actually show the rise of the apes from the apes' perspective. Fat change of that happing though. And why does it have to be science which created the apes? I always figured it was "simple" evolution that made the apes top dog.
Equally, I'd really prefer it if they never showed that. It's just far too great a mystery to have a REAL answer. (See Marcel Wallace's briefcase)
I know. What made Planet of the Apes so interesting is not how it happend, but that it happend.

I've never been a fan of prequels that uncover the mystery behind the lore of a classic movie. I don't need to know how Leatherface became who he is, just as I don't need to see how the machines rose to power in Terminator. Letting the mystery of that stew in the minds of the audience is much more effective... Though, not as profitable.
I take it you weren't a fan of Hannibal Rising either... That's exactly what the world needed, a Hannibal movie that didn't have Anthony Hopkins.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
The Human Torch said:
Not knowing the ending to Planet of the Apes is the same as not knowing the ending of King Kong. Or The Passion. Have you seen that movie yet? JESUS DIES!
JESUS DIES AT THE END OF KING KONG????

Damn, now I have to watch that. ;)
Giant Gorilla Jesus died so that you can eat bananas.
 

Alpha Maeko

Uh oh, better get Maeko!
Apr 14, 2010
573
0
0
I've seen all the originals and the "reboot".

As far as I can remember, it had something to do with pets dying and apes being domesticated. But they wouldn't have broke free and dominated the world if it weren't for that time travel debacle.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
As this is a remake of an older movie, it is also a remake of a not-so-old and not-as-good movie as well.
In the original the central ape, Caesar, was actually the child of intelligent apes from Earth's future, and not a product of present day science. He taught present day apes how to be more than they were.
This turns it around, making man's science once again turn around and bite him in the ass. Which glaringly reminds me of Deep Blue Sea [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0149261/] which actually presents the same goal, to repair brain and nerve tissue.

So you can say that it is a remake of a movie from the Planet of the Apes series, or it is a remake of Deep Blue Sea with apes instead of sharks. These being so glaringly obvious pretty much spells doom for this movie. Which sucks.
Scarim Coral said:
Do they really need "Planet of the"? It work a lot better as "Rise of the apes". Also the plot sound quite fishy. The plot is similar to that shark film "Deep Blue Sea" since it involve injecting a animal with come chemicals which result in a cure in some way but the side effect is giving it super intelligence and also killing people. How cheeky of them to steal that plot.
Argh, ninja strikes! Glad I wasn't the only one that saw the symmetry, though.
 

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,977
0
0
I'm sorry but are we meant to believe that unarmed apes could take down an entire planet's worth of military? Assuming that's what happens.