Yea, considering this game was produced by Bethesda, I was expecting that to be the completely messed up version. I guess it's just the "next to worst" messed up version because the pc version is unplayable.Raiyan 1.0 said:It's the same story as usual. PC and PS3 takes a backseat to XBox360 development.Kakulukia said:There's a shitload of texture pop-in on PS3 as well, so my guess is id screwed up big fucking time.
*sigh*
I know id is the developer but as the publisher, Bethesda should be testing this stuff before okaying it and it doesn't seem like they do. Or maybe they do, but only on the 360.
I hear MS is likely to throw a tantrum if the 360 version isn't as good as the other versions but devs can at least try and make the other versions just as good... or are they not even allowed to do that?
Honestly, I would've actually gotten a 360 if it didn't have the online fee and a 50% malfunction rate (at the time I was shopping around) but I didn't really think the competition would be as badly sandbagged as it has been this whole gen...not that the fee and waiting for replacements would've been worth it either.
Video games just seem to suck all over this gen. What happened? Did the industry really peak with the last generation?
Exactly.Valok said:Annnnd it's because of this kind of crap that Skyrim isn't pre-ordered.
Before publishers continue to ***** & whine about gamers not buying their new $60 games, they should first take a whiff if the shit they've been shoveling.