Oh, I know that they're both strawmen. As a Tumblr user myself, I'm aware that I'm not the kind of person being described here. I'm saying this is an example of a strawman that is actually funny, regardless of agreement or disagreement. That's what made the that comic's parodies so much funnier.The Wooster said:Both jokes rely on "strawmen" (like all satire does). The only difference is this one has a point you happen to agree with.Lord Krunk said:After going through the comments, I agree. As someone who was openly against the 'white guy defence force', I feel like I should say I like this one because it doesn't specifically strawman a demographic, merely trends on a particular social media outlet.IceForce said:Oh wow, this thread has turned into some sort of weird self-fulfilling prophecy.
But while one strawman is a trend, the other is a person or group of people. There's no one specifically being attacked in this comic, which is why I like it.
To put it more simply, it's like comparing jokes about Judaism as a faith and culture with jokes about Israel as a nation. There's similar subject matter, similar themes, but while one is directed as an attack on a way of life, another's humour is produced by self-awareness. The subject of the joke is not necessarily the butt of the joke, per se.
EDIT: My issue wasn't the strawman or whether I agree, so much as it was the beating of horse that fully decomposed over a decade ago. I just figure I should clarify that.