Has NASA Made First Contact?

Recommended Videos

MadeinHell

New member
Jun 18, 2009
655
0
0
Exile714 said:
If we do make first contact, it won't be to kill us or to enlighten us, it will be to sell us stuff.

The first ship to visit earth will be the intergalactic equivalent of a vacuum cleaner salesman. Of course, we won't have any space money, so they'll give us new technology on loan with a high interest rate. We have to make 100 million spacecraft toilet handles within 10 years or they'll repo our stuff.

Why is this scenario not a movie? Hollywood is so boring.
I'm pretty sure there was a film (or at least a couple books) about intergalactic salesman visiting the earth to sell as "regenerative intelligent toilet paper".
 

littlewisp

New member
Mar 25, 2010
272
0
0
Cowabungaa said:
That's a freakin' huge thing for any biologist out there, a friend of mine pretty much WOOHOO'd when he heard that.
Well fudge. I am not biology savvy in any major way, so I will probably have to show it to the only biology person I know and ask her to explain it to me in kindergartner terms. :( I think though why it doesn't immediately excite me is that it has implications that are not noticeably tangible to me. Ah well, time to go find her in the deep seas of the net. . .
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,804
0
0
littlewisp said:
Cowabungaa said:
That's a freakin' huge thing for any biologist out there, a friend of mine pretty much WOOHOO'd when he heard that.
Well fudge. I am not biology savvy in any major way, so I will probably have to show it to the only biology person I know and ask her to explain it to me in kindergartner terms. :( I think though why it doesn't immediately excite me is that it has implications that are not noticeably tangible to me. Ah well, time to go find her in the deep seas of the net. . .
That's what I warned about in another topic about this news;

In about 99% of the cases, what really excites scientists doesn't excite the 'general populace' in the slightest. Of course a part in me still hoped it was something grand and earth-shocking. Ah well.
 

zfactor

New member
Jan 16, 2010
922
0
0
Cowabungaa said:
littlewisp said:
Cowabungaa said:
That's a freakin' huge thing for any biologist out there, a friend of mine pretty much WOOHOO'd when he heard that.
Well fudge. I am not biology savvy in any major way, so I will probably have to show it to the only biology person I know and ask her to explain it to me in kindergartner terms. :( I think though why it doesn't immediately excite me is that it has implications that are not noticeably tangible to me. Ah well, time to go find her in the deep seas of the net. . .
That's what I warned about in another topic about this news;

In about 99% of the cases, what really excites scientists doesn't excite the 'general populace' in the slightest.
*gasp*

Like superfluids! And taychons! And quantinum computaional devices! And Boes-Einstein condesates! And... other... stuff...
 

littlewisp

New member
Mar 25, 2010
272
0
0
Cowabungaa said:
In about 99% of the cases, what really excites scientists doesn't excite the 'general populace' in the slightest.
Hehe, if it's exciting to scientists than at least further down the line, in some number of years, it will produce something that the rest of us will find exciting.

Though it does help if you know someone in a field who is excited and enthusiastic about something and can explain it well. The person I know started talking to me about micro-biology and engineering stuff (which she is incredibly dedicated to), and I found myself thinking it was pretty awesome. But, had I heard about it through a dry news post, I would have passed it by without much thought.

Maybe scientists just need a good marketing team. : /
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
I have a terrible feeling that NASA is panicking right now looking at our comments.

Serves them right for being so cryptic.
 

LogicProbe

New member
Nov 27, 2010
10
0
0
Amazing. What could this possibly mean for us as a species? If the life is bacterial, do we send probes to collect some specimens and study them? Or are we dealing with intelligent life forms? Are they advanced enough to start intergalactic communication?

This is actually happening! All our lives we've dreamed of life beyond our own and now proof of extraterrestrial life may be revealed!
 

toapat

New member
Mar 28, 2009
899
0
0
Um, we have known life off of earth has existed since like, the 80s, when some random scientist noticed a rock in the polar ice cap, dug it up, and found it not only to be from mars, but to contain a few martian bacteria cells

if this is extra terrestrial Life, then Hubble apparently got a nice shot of an Alpha Centari Bug's Ass
 

Kumomaru

New member
May 21, 2008
158
0
0
Benndak said:
Since the "I, for one" has been done to death, I'll just sit in my corner and pray for Mass Effect.
I, for one, think that welcoming evil overlords after acknowledging they are evil is f-ing retarded.

Also funny =3
 

marblemadness

New member
May 26, 2010
57
0
0
I love the escapist, but this was just a really poorly written article. It was fine up to the point that he mentioned alien overlords and robots...
 

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
Something to look out for. I couldn't see anything on the NASA website about the announcement on Thursday though.
 

TheColourSociety

New member
Dec 1, 2010
2
0
0
toapat said:
Um, we have known life off of earth has existed since like, the 80s, when some random scientist noticed a rock in the polar ice cap, dug it up, and found it not only to be from mars, but to contain a few martian bacteria cells

if this is extra terrestrial Life, then Hubble apparently got a nice shot of an Alpha Centari Bug's Ass
Thats wrong. It ended up being fractures in the rock caused by volcanic pressure, or the pressure from plunging into the earth's atmosphere or something similar to that. It wasn't martian bacteria cells. We have not discovered life anywhere else but earth.

EDIT: Or rather, it's not wrong o_O;

http://skymania.com/wp/2009/11/ancient-martians-were-carried-to-earth.html
 

sheic99

New member
Oct 15, 2008
2,314
0
0
burzummaniac said:
sheic99 said:
I wonder if it contains instructions to build a machine that appears to do nothing on the outside, but will send a person several thousand light years. Preferably containing Jodie Foster.
MASS EFFECT!
Nope, Contact.
 

A Pious Cultist

New member
Jul 4, 2009
1,103
0
0
Azmael Silverlance said:
Id like some skeleton with DNA remains or whatnot.... but will have to wait until tomorow :D
You're making the assumption that the life would have a skeletal system. Or DNA.
 

Fox242

El Zorro Cauto
Nov 9, 2009
867
0
0
Atticus89 said:
Why not a Space Whale? It would be awesome if it was a Space Whale. :D
And if they show up on the moon, then..."We're whalers on the moon!" Hooray for random Futurama references!
 

Sporky111

Digital Wizard
Dec 17, 2008
4,009
0
0
tellmeimaninja said:
I think we should find turians. I like turians.
I was thinking the same thing. If they aren't reporting a group of turians that just came through a mass relay, I'm going to be very disappointed.
 

Quazimofo

New member
Aug 30, 2010
1,370
0
0
Dr. Paine said:
rsvp42 said:
Okay, EVERYONE knows that if we create sapient robots, they WILL revolt.

Aliens... I can see them pretty much ignoring us. But the robots will be our doom.

And for the asari vs. Na'vi thing, I vote asari.
i vote asari too. yeah the na'vi are 10 feet tall and can ride dragons but the asari could pick them up, rip off their tails, and throw them off a cliff with their minds (the na'vi not the dragons. well maybe a really really badass asari could do that to a dragon but thats another discussion)